Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. District Court in Virginia Expedites Rick Perry’s Ballot Access Lawsuit
Ballot Access News ^ | 12-29-2011 | Richard Winger

Posted on 12/29/2011 11:59:17 AM PST by smoothsailing

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last
To: casinva

if this were the left doing it to republicans the MSM would be cheering.

the days of just sitting back and giving up for the sake of the insiders is long gone.


81 posted on 12/29/2011 4:51:08 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
There is no Constitutional right to vote in a Primary Election.

This is not simply an issue of a simple "Constitutional right to vote in a primary election". What we were talking of here (in our little part of a thread) was about preserving a Republic and the actions of a state that could possibly jeopardize the rights of American citizens in general.

You really should do a little in-depth study of this issue before this case begins and when you do, it will make more sense to you. You might even enjoy watching the events of the case as it proceeds once you understand it all and what is being considered. But you really DO need to understand the difference between the federal and the state aspect of this first.

Perhaps a google search or two on something like "state rights in a republic" or "federal involvement in state primaries", or "corruption in state primaries and Constitutional protection"??? Those would be good starting points for you and would help answer your earlier question as to what rights could have been violated or what a state (or commonwealth) may have done to intentionally hurt and/or damage our Republic form of government in the United States.

As I said, we don't know all of what we actually have here until the case brings forth the evidence to the public, and right now, it's just the appearances of the VA GOP that simply "look" bad, but we'll certainly have a better idea of any possibly unconstitutional actions once the hearing begins, and you'll want to be prepared to understand it a little more then. Good luck!

82 posted on 12/29/2011 5:05:36 PM PST by casinva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
the days of just sitting back and giving up for the sake of the insiders is long gone.

I do believe regular citizens in our country are beginning to understand how to better stand up and fight the dirty tricks of liberal media who outright campaign for their pretty boys, established politicians who want to hold on to personal power, and corrupt parties who vandalize citizens to get their way if need be. It is still going to be a hard battle to fight against these forces because they are very established in unfair fights and will not hesitate in many instances to get what they want regardless, but we, as regular American citizens, are beginning to at least see these things and are building the foundation to stop them in their disgusting disregard for America and her principles and values.

Governor Perry's court case is only one small part of our taking America back, but...

We regular citizens are getting there; we're learning, and we won't STOP until we have made a difference!

83 posted on 12/29/2011 5:24:04 PM PST by casinva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
If the state GOP ignored the law in making rules,

What "law"? The Republican Party is not a government entity and Federal judges, no matter how smart they think they are, should have absolutely nothing to say about their internal rules. They especially should have nothing to say about a state political party.

If Newt should benefit by a Federal judge sticking his nose in this state political party business, he should call for the judges arrest.

84 posted on 12/29/2011 5:24:19 PM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz; Darth Reardon
Rick Perry has No Case!
Chandler v. City of Arvada
85 posted on 12/29/2011 5:58:19 PM PST by Quicksilver (nominate Rick Perry - defeat Obama - overhaul Washington!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Fairer ballot access is on a moral level with owning and exploiting other human beings?

I think this VA ballot law is stupid, and I really hope I get more candidates to choose from, but I mean to compare those two is just absurd.


86 posted on 12/29/2011 6:22:27 PM PST by RecoveringPaulisto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing; Cincinatus' Wife; shield

I seriously hope Perry wins this suit.

Go Perry!

BTW, the ballot candidates should be voicing their opposition to the exclusion of the others. But that would require honorable men — perish the thought...


87 posted on 12/29/2011 6:35:00 PM PST by Gene Eric (C'mon, Virginia -- are you with us or against us?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton; Mr Rogers; casinva

See post #85. Perry’s case is about Virginia’s law requiring petition circulators to be registered/eligible to vote in Virginia, thereby reducing the pool of available circulators to gather signatures.


88 posted on 12/29/2011 6:39:19 PM PST by Quicksilver (nominate Rick Perry - defeat Obama - overhaul Washington!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric
Hey Gene, I want him to win too, and I think he will.

BTW, the ballot candidates should be voicing their opposition to the exclusion of the others. But that would require honorable men — perish the thought...

Run that by me again, I'm not sure what you meant?

89 posted on 12/29/2011 6:49:05 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton; Mr Rogers; casinva; trumandogz; Darth Reardon
Also related to Perry's case:

Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation
90 posted on 12/29/2011 6:52:44 PM PST by Quicksilver (nominate Rick Perry - defeat Obama - overhaul Washington!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

The other GOP candidates should refuse to participate in the VA primary election given the outrageous manipulation of the ballot.


91 posted on 12/29/2011 6:57:04 PM PST by Gene Eric (C'mon, Virginia -- are you with us or against us?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

Oh, OK, now I see what you meant. Thanks.


92 posted on 12/29/2011 7:00:15 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Quicksilver

Thanks for that info. It will be interesting to see what the court may decide as to what was appropriate and what was not appropriate in the qualifying and signature verification / rejection process. It appears from this Colorado case that at least a few of Virginia’s standards do not fit into an “appropriate” requirement category. Do you think Virginia including Romney volunteers on the qualification committee will come up as well? Should be an interesting case to follow.


93 posted on 12/29/2011 7:13:52 PM PST by casinva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: casinva
Do you think Virginia including Romney volunteers on the qualification committee will come up as well?
I'm not good at guessing what a court will do. However, I don't think that will be considered; I don't see how it would be a constitutional issue.
94 posted on 12/29/2011 7:57:44 PM PST by Quicksilver (nominate Rick Perry - defeat Obama - overhaul Washington!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Quicksilver
I don't think that will be considered; I don't see how it would be a constitutional issue.

You're most likely right about the issue of Romney volunteers on the VA ballot qualification committee. That part is a concern of corruption within the VA GOP, not a Constitutional issue.

Thanks for the response and for the previous info!

95 posted on 12/29/2011 10:07:56 PM PST by casinva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Screw the GOP pushing they’re Romney through!In the end...Santorum,Perry, Bachmann or Gingrich slighty holding nose- will get the nomination.And the tea party will all back the nominee and trump the GOP establishment cronies!


96 posted on 12/30/2011 6:38:19 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

I think in the special circumstances as The GOP and the MSM shoving Romney in our face,lowdown,nasty tricks.Perry can utilize whatever is needed to fight this.The GOP and media will not chose the nominee.


97 posted on 12/30/2011 6:42:21 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

I think these articles are updates:

http://hamptonroads.com/2011/12/perry-loses-first-round-virginia-ballot-battle

http://hamptonroads.com/2011/12/lawsuit-seeks-get-gingrich-virginia-ballot


98 posted on 12/30/2011 6:49:14 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

You sound like this talking point in the comments below this article.If it was your candidate Palin,or Santorum or who ever it seems you would be screaming if they’re name was left off of a state ballot because the GOP want Romney.

http://hamptonroads.com/2011/12/perry-loses-first-round-virginia-ballot-battle


99 posted on 12/30/2011 6:58:56 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

If you read what the Judge told Perry’s attorneys, it would appear he doesn’t care much for their suit. I predict he will rule against Perry.


100 posted on 12/30/2011 7:28:11 AM PST by Old Retired Army Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson