Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Making Fun of Mormonism [or not]
Religion Dispatches ^ | December 5, 2011 | MAX MUELLER

Posted on 12/31/2011 9:31:32 PM PST by delacoert

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: delacoert
Forget Meadow Mountain Massacre.
What about Romney's attacks on Gov Palin to THROW the election?

Team Romney EVEN went after the children
as he HIDES behind his religion.


"Peeking Out From the McCain Wreckage: Mitt Romney"

"Someone's got to say it: IS MITT ROMNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR OBAMA'S VICTORY?"

"Vanity: Team Romney Sabotaged Palin and Continuing to Do So?"

"Romney Supporters Trashing Palin"

"Romney advisors sniping at Palin?"


Poor sport spoiler Romney doing what he does best:

Novak: "Fred Thompson drop-out rumors traced to Romney campaign"

Said Novak: "The rumors were traced in part to Mitt Romney's campaign,
trying to stir up strife between McCain and Thompson
."

"Despite outspending his rivals by huge margins throughout the primaries,
(Mitt Romney, Carpetbagger UT,CA,MA,NH,Mexico) lost Iowa, South Carolina, Florida and California.
The only primaries he won were in Michigan, where Dad was governor; LDS states;
and a few states on Super Tuesday in which his California-obsessed rivals
couldn't spare the cash to advertise.
Only John Connolly in 1968 had a worse cash-to-delegates ratio.
And John McCain rightly did not like Romney's tactics during the primaries.
(W)hen (Romney's early leads) started slipping away, he resorted to unfair,
distorted, scorched-earth negative ads, betting that his opponents couldn't
afford to spend enough for the truth to catch up to his charges."

[Romney: A Mistake for McCain, 7/23/2008, Dick Morris]



21 posted on 01/01/2012 5:01:47 AM PST by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delacoert

Romney statement to ease Mormonism fears.

“If I am the Republican Party’s candidate for president, who happens also to be a Mormon. I do not speak for my church on public matters, and my underpants do not speak for me.”


22 posted on 01/01/2012 6:19:42 AM PST by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delacoert

Ex-Mormon testimony:

http://www.faithfacts.org/world-religions-and-theology/ex-mormon-testimony


23 posted on 01/01/2012 8:13:58 AM PST by grumpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delacoert
"Violence" can hacve a range of meanings: immoral aggression (a violent crime), natural force (a violent storm), vehement artistic expression (a violent percussion riff), jarring (a violent shade of red).

Violet rhetoric might fit several of these definitions, but not all of them.

24 posted on 01/01/2012 8:21:22 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (The Violent Bear It Away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delacoert

But not a violent violet. Typo.


25 posted on 01/01/2012 8:22:06 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (The Violent Bear It Away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

It was written by a Smith disciple. The author is a member of the LDS.


26 posted on 01/01/2012 8:23:31 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (The Violent Bear It Away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
The rhetoric highlighted in this article is of a specific type not recognizable as violence.

The rhetoric provides caricatures of weirdness - not restricted to theology alone, but weirdness encompassing the behavior and aspirations of the Mormon priesthoods afforded ALL Mormon men.

Phrases such as sacred underwear, baptizing holocaust victims, and gods of their own planets lampoon Mormons and it embarrasses them.

If it is violence (which it is not), then every politician lampooned by David Letterman, Jay Leno, Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert, Bill Maher, Conan O'Brien is a victim of violence and the comics deserve the death penalty.

Growing up in public isn't easy on anyone.

27 posted on 01/01/2012 12:44:44 PM PST by delacoert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian
Martyrs don't die in shootouts! Sacrificial lambs aren't armed! J. Smith fired 2 weapons as he died
Please cite your source because that is not mentioned in D&C 135. In History of the Church, it is stated that Joseph discharged his six-shooter (single weapon) into the hallway, some barrels of which misfired. As he was not alone, his older brother Hyrum already killed by two balls, Elder Taylor hit by four balls, but alive, and Dr. Richards escaped unharmed. Obviously the Prophet was fighting to protect himself AND others in the room, two of whom were visitors and not under arrest. BTW, legally, mobs don't go around storming jails and executing innocent prisoners. That happens in Islamic countries.
28 posted on 01/01/2012 1:07:04 PM PST by Christopher Dion (Mountain Dew and doughnuts... because breakfast is the most important meal of the day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Christopher Dion
Please cite your source...

Well, you caused me to review my sources. And I do need to correct one thing -- which I changed in the tagline. Smith indeed had two weapons; but only fired one of the two. (Apparently, the mob didn't give him time)

Here's the source: John Hay Atlantic Monthly article December 1869 671-678

Hay wrote:

Smith had TWO loaded six-barrelled revolvers in his room. How a man on trial for capital offences came to be supplied with such luxuries is a mystery that perhaps only one man could fully have solved; and as General Deming, the Jack-Mormon sheriff, died soon after, and left no explanation of the matter, investigation is effectually baffled. But the four shots which I have chronicled, and two which had no billet, exhausted one pistol, and the enemy gave Smith no time to use the other. Severely wounded as he was, he ran to the window, which was open to receive the fresh June air, and half leaped, half fell, into the jail yard below. With his last dying energies he gathered himself up, and leaned in a sitting posture against the rude stone well-curb. His stricken condition, his vague wandering glances, excited no pity in the mob thirsting for his life. They had not seen the handsome fight he had made in the jail; there was no appeal to the border chivalry (there is chivalry on the borders, as in all semi-barbarous regions). A squad of Missourians who were standing by the fence levelled their pieces at him, and, before they could see him again for the smoke they made, Joe Smith was dead.

In History of the Church, it is stated that Joseph discharged his six-shooter (single weapon) into the hallway, some barrels of which misfired. As he was not alone, his older brother Hyrum already killed by two balls, Elder Taylor hit by four balls, but alive, and Dr. Richards escaped unharmed. (Christopher Dion)

Well, note what one faithful Latter-Day Saint said:

"Of the three barrels discharged by Joseph, it is believed he hit three men: an Irishman named Wells-who was in the mob from his love of a brawl-in the arm; Voorhees-an oversized kid from Bear Creek known for his lack of good sense-in the shoulder; and a man named Gallagher-a Southerner from the Mississippi Bottom-in the face." "Two other men were known to get hit in the hall, one a man named Townsend from Fort Madison, Iowa Territory, who died nine months later from the arm wound that wouldn't heal, and another named Mills, who was shot in the arm." - Elder Reed Blake, 24 Hours to Martyrdom, p. 129

You said some "barrels" (plural) of Smith's gun "misfired." If at least two barrels misfired from a six-shooter, how did Smith shoot five people?

Some sources chronicle four of the six shots by Smith.

Please also note: While Hyrum Smith was indeed shot in the face from the front by one of the mob shooters...a lingering Q still isn't explained: Who shot Hyrum Smith in the back?

From a Mormon author: "...it was found that the wound that killed Hyrum was sustained in his face while he was apparently holding the door against the mobbers. This was verified by one of the survivors, Willard Richards. Also discovered, however, was a wound in his lower back. The mystery of that wound is hard to explain if he was shot in the face and, falling backward, never moved as the survivors later testified. One report state he was shot in the back by a rifleman outside the window, but this is not a credible report since the...room is on the second floor and the door is some distance from the window. Other wounds found on his body were in front, sustained as he lay on the floor. But that back wound, after 160 years, is still a mystery." (Lds author George W. Givens, 500 More Little-Known Facts in Mormon History, Bonneville Books, 2004, p. 46)

I surmise that one of those supposed "misfires" from Joseph Smith actually hit his brother in the back about the same time -- Hyrum was fired on front from the front.

I've seen Web links of pictures of the scene... There’s no way somebody could have shot Hyrum Smith in the back as he was near the door on the second floor. The only person who had a weapon within range was his brother, Joseph. And they were receiving shots from just outside the door, where Joseph Smith may have wanted to return a volley. Only perhaps he hit brother Hyrum instead.

John Taylor, who was in the room, later recounted: "I shall never forget the deep feeling of sympathy and regard manifested in the countenance of Brother Joseph as he drew nigh to Hyrum, and, leaning over him, exclaimed, 'Oh! my poor, dear brother Hyrum!' He, however, instantly arose, and with a firm, quick step, and a determined expression of countenance, approached the door…

Taylor then says Smith “discharged” three barrels through a cracked door,, snapping the pistol six times. But what if he miscounted or simply assumed Smith was firing all that he had? And what if all he had was 5 shots/5 barrels left – because he had already shot his brother?

29 posted on 01/01/2012 3:06:41 PM PST by Colofornian (Martyrs don't die in shootouts Sacrificial lambs aren't armed J. Smith fired 1 of 2 guns as he died)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: delacoert
"The rhetoric highlighted in this article is of a specific type not recognizable as violence. "

Yes, you're right about that: the specific examples were not what I'd call violent. So I accept your point.

However I have seen stuff that the organized LGBT's, especially, have put against the Mormons, which was eye-blisteringly obscene, offensive, and thrteatening, up to and including the targeting of their businesses and homes, retaliation against their employers and their professional standing, and vicious organized harrassment. This was because of the Mormons' major financial and on-the-ground support for Proposition 8.

I am grateful to the Mormons for opposing the Gay Brown Shirts, and yes, I think there have been plenty of violent verbal attacks on Mormons. Sadly, when that happens they often can't depend on solidarity and defense from other religious and social conservatives.

30 posted on 01/01/2012 5:24:39 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o ("You can observe a lot just by watchin' " . --- Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson