[G Larry]

“Ambivalent” about who Replaces Obama...

Passionate about Replacing him!!!

Big misread by the author!

[skr]

Mr. Neumayr is confusing primaries with general elections. Republicans are very motivated to vote him out once we choose a candidate. Since when is a primary supposed to be a walk in the park?

[edpc]

The 2008 Dem primary dragged on into the summer. I don’t remember anyone referring to them as demoralized. If anything, the results of Iowa should put a few broadsides into the Romney coronation theory. He did worse this time than he did 4 years ago, with tons more money and organization than the others in the field. Yet, he “won” by 1/10 of 1 percent.

[waynesa98]

Obambi may not have an opposition that's fired up over a messiah, but as I've been telling people I would vote for my dead cat before the commie in chief. I can't believe even the most ardent Evangelical would stay home if Mitt is the candidate.

Dem's are losing registered voters to independents and college kids can't find work. Bambi's major blocks are the ones discouraged. That said, put fear in your peps hearts, all the better to get them to the polls.

[La Enchiladita]

This is exactly the meme of the DNC, that GOPers are “ambivalent.” It was what Juan Williams got from the Iowa results, that Republicans are “deeply divided.” This has been and will be their mantra. Why feed into it? Instead, view the process as dynamic and deeply American. We don’t believe in merely appointing a leader, but thoroughly vetting the candidates. That is what is happening. Why has all the political commentary become nervous-Nelly-ism? Just let the process play out; let the people decide.

Wasn’t there tremendous strife in the Dem 2008 primaries — Ubama, Hitlery, Edwards et al — before their candidate emerged? Was that “ambivalence” or various camps supporting their preference?

Sheesh!

[Bulwinkle]

The author is loony! the GOP is so fired up and fighting mad, we are just temporarily we are fighting each other.... but that will end in the Spring.

[x]

Say this at least for the Democrats: They have the sense to run nominees who actually support the platform of their party. This rudimentary task is too tricky for Republicans to perform. They haven't been able to locate in over a generation a presidential nominee who supports theirs. George Bush Sr., Bob Dole, George Bush Jr., John McCain, and now Mitt Romney in all likelihood: this is a dismal roll call of nominees with little to no interest in the ostensible platform of the GOP.

Neumayr certainly scores high points as a purist, but that kind of zeal can get in the way of seeing things clearly.

[Gator113]

Obama is well on his way of being reelected and he hasn’t had to lift a finger.

The incompetent cowards the make up our GOP have already failed.... frankly, it looks intentional to me.

It wouldn’t surprise me to see Fox News and the Republican elite guarantee Obama’s reelection before the general even begins.... they are working on that 24/7.

The very second that Romney wins the nomination, Obama wins the election.

Newt Gingrich is the one man that could beat Obama, but we, as a fractured group, may very well hand the nomination to Romney and in doing so, seal our fate-—4 more fricking years of that corrupt country wrecking white hating Black Muslim bastard son of a communist whore.