Skip to comments.
Santorum comes under closer scrutiny in New Hampshire
Reuters ^
| Jan 5, 2012
| Reuters
Posted on 01/05/2012 5:25:15 PM PST by mdittmar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
1
posted on
01/05/2012 5:25:19 PM PST
by
mdittmar
To: mdittmar
2
posted on
01/05/2012 5:28:20 PM PST
by
BunnySlippers
(I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
To: mdittmar
Go, Perry, Go!! Go, Santorum, GO!! Go, Newt, GO!!
FUMR!! FUKR!! FUAP!! FUBO!!
3
posted on
01/05/2012 5:30:33 PM PST
by
Jim Robinson
(Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
To: mdittmar
The rodents at Rooters turn their guns on Santorum now. Forgotten are Bachmann's gaffes, Cain's inappropriate remarks and Newt's lobbying activities.
Oddly, not a critical word about Willard, who's been a front runner for months now.
Could these a**holes be any more transparent??
4
posted on
01/05/2012 5:32:14 PM PST
by
skeeter
To: mdittmar
College students booed him at New England College over his position against gay marriage
So what?
People that support perverts getting married are not likely to be voters for a conservative anyhow..........
5
posted on
01/05/2012 5:34:29 PM PST
by
SECURE AMERICA
(Where can I sign up for the New American Revolution and the Crusades 2012?)
To: SECURE AMERICA
College students booed him at New England College over his position against gay marriage
They were never going to vote for him anyway.
6
posted on
01/05/2012 5:37:35 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
To: BunnySlippers
“GO PERRY GO!”
Maybe. What legislation would Perry submit that Romney wouldn’t?
7
posted on
01/05/2012 5:38:04 PM PST
by
ex-snook
("above all things, truth beareth away the victory")
To: mdittmar
So the baby killers and gay activists don’t like Rick Santorum. So what? Does that mean we should get back to killing babies and bringing gerbils into churches, as Reuters clearly wants?
8
posted on
01/05/2012 5:38:28 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: skeeter
“Oddly, not a critical word about Willard, who’s been a front runner for months now.”
Is there any criticism about Romney that hasn’t previously been explored or isn’t already widely known? I’m pretty sure that’s why he’s not been able to expand his support.
9
posted on
01/05/2012 5:39:47 PM PST
by
COgamer
To: SECURE AMERICA
People that support perverts getting married are not likely to be voters for a conservative anyhow.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Exactly. And as far as his “Blacks and Welfare” remarks: Blacks will vote for Obama 95% anyhow.
SPEAK THE TRUTH RICK!!!
10
posted on
01/05/2012 5:40:49 PM PST
by
no dems
(I'm more concerned with America's future than I am Newt's past.)
To: SECURE AMERICA
Lets face it. New England College ain't exactly Stanford. Last I heard Santorum' position on gay marriage is the same as obama's. Wonder if they will ever boo him (no I don't.)
To: mdittmar
Wow! Didn’t see that coming!
/s
12
posted on
01/05/2012 5:49:14 PM PST
by
2111USMC
(Not a hard man to track. Leaves dead men wherever he goes.)
To: COgamer
I was referring to the major news networks. 99% of the criticism of WIllard I've heard has come from alternative/conservative news sources.
I have the feeling the MSM is overplaying their hand, though. Given Obama's low approvals people are certainly hoping for an alternative, and they have to be noticing how the mainstream network news media is acting as political assassins on his behalf.
How they can retain any credibility at all is beyond me.
13
posted on
01/05/2012 5:50:19 PM PST
by
skeeter
To: ex-snook
14
posted on
01/05/2012 5:50:50 PM PST
by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: FReepers
**click to donate**
15
posted on
01/05/2012 5:52:40 PM PST
by
STARWISE
(The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
To: no dems
Exactly. And as far as his Blacks and Welfare remarks: Blacks will vote for Obama 95% anyhow Santorum never said "black". CBS put that word there, in front of "people's lives". Inside the quotation marks. But he never said it. And the video of the event proves it.
They lied.
Again.
16
posted on
01/05/2012 5:58:38 PM PST
by
okie01
(THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
To: skeeter
they have to be noticing how the mainstream network news media is acting as political assassins on his behalf.After our caucus here in Iowa, and the 2008 general election, I've finally had to face reality. The reality is that the vast majority of the general public are uninformed dunces.
17
posted on
01/05/2012 6:00:03 PM PST
by
2111USMC
(Not a hard man to track. Leaves dead men wherever he goes.)
To: 2111USMC
Remember that 47% of Americans don't pay a penny of federal taxes, millions receive public assistance of some kind or other, one in eight Americans are immigrants (and the vast majority of those vote Democrat) and a good portion of the population directly or indirectly works for the state.
Meaning they're not dunces, they're voting their own pocketbooks.
Maybe that makes you feel better.
Then again, maybe it doesn't - after all, stupid people can be informed.
18
posted on
01/05/2012 6:20:04 PM PST
by
skeeter
To: mdittmar
Santorum is about to see how it feels to be standing under a waterfall of Manure coming down on him.
He has never experienced the Horse biscuit battle coming his way.
If he survives I may vote for him.
19
posted on
01/05/2012 7:21:09 PM PST
by
Venturer
To: mylife
20
posted on
01/05/2012 7:23:28 PM PST
by
South40
(Just say NO to pro-ILLEGAL alien RINOS!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson