Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/08/2012 9:23:24 PM PST by bruinbirdman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: bruinbirdman

Why didn’t they just drop the stuff off at Newark, NJ and then by train to Pittsburgh? Oh, that’s right, we don’t do that sort of thing anymore/SARCASM


2 posted on 01/08/2012 9:29:20 PM PST by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

Large ships amaze and awe me, but think of the loss of product if one sinks.


3 posted on 01/08/2012 9:47:17 PM PST by Amberdawn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

Any idea of how long it takes to load this ship?

I know nothing about ships or shipping but if the load time becomes a significant part of the overall transit time, you may be better off with two smaller ships.


4 posted on 01/08/2012 9:55:37 PM PST by super7man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

Can it still be hijacked by a gaggle of Somali pirates in the usual manner or will they need a trampoline to get on board?


5 posted on 01/08/2012 10:03:33 PM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

Fill 3 of them up with iron ore, half-way through the Suez Canal, sink them. Maybe that’s what the Chinese built them for?


7 posted on 01/08/2012 10:14:23 PM PST by Dogbert41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

China opposes the construction of these ships by Vale. Vale will ultimately build 38 Valemax ships for $8 billion. They reduce China’s negotiating leverage in purchasing Brazilian iron ore. China’s favors its own shipping industry, which has smaller tonnages and is therefore less efficient and more costly per tonne. Brazil must reduce transportation costs, however, since Australia has a big distance, and therefore cost, advantage. This is against a backdrop of declining charter rates since the financial crisis. This is a gutsy plan for Vale.


11 posted on 01/08/2012 10:53:50 PM PST by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

I hate writers.

This ship is perhaps the biggest “bulk carrier”. There are larger container ships, and there have been oil tankers that dwarf this ship.


12 posted on 01/08/2012 11:00:54 PM PST by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

Super Size Me!


13 posted on 01/08/2012 11:03:39 PM PST by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> - - -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

That’sa big ship. To put it’s size in perspective, it is 8 times the tonnage of teh USS Missouri or RMS Titanic, and more than 4 times that of a supercarrier.


17 posted on 01/08/2012 11:42:30 PM PST by rmlew ("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

Hmm. There is a capsize in Capesize.


22 posted on 01/09/2012 4:54:27 AM PST by Molon Labbie (End the War On Drugs, Restore the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

How much would it take to convert into an aircraft carrier?


26 posted on 01/09/2012 6:16:33 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman
Looks almost big enough to carry Michael Moore's lunch.
27 posted on 01/09/2012 7:00:41 AM PST by Moltke (Always retaliate first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson