Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China slams new Asian slant in US defense strategy [Actual Title]
The Times of India ^ | January 9, 2012 | The Times of India

Posted on 01/09/2012 3:29:12 PM PST by James C. Bennett

BEIJING: China on Monday slammed the United States' new Asian-focused defense strategy, saying its accusations of a lack of openness in Beijing's military policy were "groundless and untrustworthy.''

The strategy unveiled Thursday shifts the U.S. military focus away from Iraq and Afghanistan and makes a renewed commitment to assert America's position in the Asia-Pacific region.

The document says the growth of China's military power must be accompanied by greater clarity in its strategic intentions to avoid causing friction in the region.

In response, China said it was committed to peaceful development and a "defensive'' policy.

"China's strategic intent is clear, open and transparent,'' Foreign Ministry spokesman Liu Weimin told reporters at a regular briefing.

"Our national defense modernization serves the objective requirements of national security and development and also plays an active role in maintaining regional peace and stability. It will not pose any threat to any country,'' Liu said. "The charges against China in this document are groundless and untrustworthy.''

He added that maintaining peace, stability and prosperity in the region serve the common interests of all Asia-Pacific countries "and we hope the U.S. will play a more constructive role to this end.''

U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said the U.S. is not anticipating military conflict in Asia, but that it became so bogged down in Iraq and Afghanistan after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks that it missed chances to improve its strategic position elsewhere.

Panetta said the Asia-Pacific region is growing in importance for the U.S. economy and national security, so the nation needed to maintain "our military's technological edge and freedom of action.''

The new strategy also identified India as a long-term strategic partner that can serve as a regional economic anchor and provider of security in the Indian Ocean region. It said the U.S. will try to maintain peace on the Korean peninsula by working with allies and others in Asia to defend against North Korean provocations.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: asia; china; india; strategy

1 posted on 01/09/2012 3:29:21 PM PST by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett

Oh please, China isn’t threatened by us. We’re sharing all of our missile defense secrets with Russia. By extension I feel confident that the Red Chinese will obtain whatever technology of ours they do not already posses.
A few months of study and they will know all of our weaknesses.


2 posted on 01/09/2012 3:43:04 PM PST by formosa (Formosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett

A country without any aggressive intent would not be threatened by the tiny (relative to Chinese forces) US presence in the region. They’re just ticked off that we’re creating a bigger obstacle for a Chinese invasion force.


3 posted on 01/09/2012 5:05:38 PM PST by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett

It might be interesting to ask the Chinese what they mean by “defensive”. They have territorial disputes with many of their neighbours (India, Vietnam) and all their maritime neighbours and with the ones that they don’t have any disputes anymore, they have submitted to the claims of only Russia, while bullying others into giving up their claims (the Central Asian countries & Pakistan).

They termed their conquest and occupation of Tibet and E. Turkestan as “Liberation”. In their minds, a liberation of claimed areas would probably still be “defensive”


4 posted on 01/10/2012 1:06:19 AM PST by MimirsWell (Pganini, cmdjing, andyahoo, artaxerces, todd_hall, EdisonOne - counting my Chicom scalps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett
it makes sense. india is the linchpin for safety in the Indian Ocean. As it's economy improves and it gets more confident AND it's navy improves (it arguably HAS a blue-water navy now), India can provide security and project power along East Africa, the Persian Gulf and to the Straits of Malacca.

Singapore will provide security for the Straits of Malacca -- it has to as it depends on that.

The Philippines need to step up to anchor the east, or Australia can do that job for now.

South Korea and the Japanese defense force can secure East Asia

there is no need for us to go it alone.

5 posted on 01/10/2012 4:39:18 AM PST by Cronos (Party like it's 12 20, 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett
The Chicoms misunderstand.
The only times Obama concerns himself with Asia is when he vacations in Hawaii.
6 posted on 01/10/2012 4:42:22 AM PST by Happy Rain ("If Mitt wins the Twit wins.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett
Photobucket
7 posted on 01/10/2012 4:51:17 AM PST by Ronald_Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson