Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Calif. HS student devises possible cancer cure
CBS News ^ | 1/13/12 | Steve Hartman .

Posted on 01/13/2012 5:23:41 PM PST by Brandonmark

If you ever worry about the future of America, there is no need: it is in good hands. A high school student named Angela is proof of that. We think you'll agree she is nothing short of amazing. CBS News correspondent Steve Hartman met her on the road.

Born to Chinese immigrants, 17-year-old Angela Zhang of Cupertino, California is a typical American teenager. She's really into shoes and is just learning how to drive.

But there is one thing that separates her from every other student at Monta Vista High School, something she first shared with her chemistry teacher, Kavita Gupta.

It's a research paper Angela wrote in her spare time -- and it is advanced, to say the least. Gupta says all she knows is its recipe -- for curing cancer.

"Cure for cancer -- a high school student," said Gupta. "It's just so mind-boggling. I just cannot even begin to comprehend how she even thought about it or did this."

"I just thought, 'Why not?' 'What is there to lose?'" said Angela.

When she was a freshman, she started reading doctorate level papers on bio-engineering.

"At first it was a little bit overwhelming," said Angela, "but I found that it almost became like a puzzle, being able to decode something."

By sophomore year she'd talked her way into the lab at Stanford, and by junior year was doing her own research.

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cancer; cancercure
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-68 next last

1 posted on 01/13/2012 5:23:45 PM PST by Brandonmark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark

I wonder how many dollars are wrapped up in non profit groups in theory raising money to eliminate cancer? Pharmaceuticals? Cancer hospitals?

Awesome if it pans out.


2 posted on 01/13/2012 5:29:50 PM PST by listenhillary (Look your representatives in the eye and ask if they intend to pay off the debt. They will look away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark

Angela Zhang - will you marry me?

There! I said it first!

What a wonderful young woman!


3 posted on 01/13/2012 5:32:53 PM PST by spankalib (The Marx-in-the-Parks crowd is a basement skunkworks operation of the AFL-CIO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark

The cure for cancer is just around the corner.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The biggest damn corner I’ve ever seen.


4 posted on 01/13/2012 5:32:53 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary

It sure will be awesome if she is able to do what she has set out to do!

At 17, I’m sure I wasn’t anything but a cut up in school............


5 posted on 01/13/2012 5:34:02 PM PST by basil (It's time to rid the country of "gun free zones" aka "Killing Fields")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark

This can’t be. She attends one of those crappy public high schools and we are told they are all worthless. /S


6 posted on 01/13/2012 5:36:24 PM PST by Netizen (Path to citizenship = Scamnesty. If you give it away, more will come. Who's pilfering your wallet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark

Amazing


7 posted on 01/13/2012 5:37:39 PM PST by therightliveswithus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark

Now put her to work on the economy.


8 posted on 01/13/2012 5:40:00 PM PST by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark
Holy smoke.

Best of luck to her in everything she does.

9 posted on 01/13/2012 5:41:58 PM PST by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark
Hopefully Stanford (or some other school above the city college level) will give her a pass and not admit a couple of dozen "protected minorities" before considering her application for admission.

(Or, maybe she can go out of state.)

10 posted on 01/13/2012 5:43:30 PM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark

Way to go Angela. Prayers that you are spot on with your research.


11 posted on 01/13/2012 5:45:46 PM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Netizen
Monta Vista in Cupertino CA. You can see that she not only attends a public high school she has been confined to the Asian-Origin ghetto.

Apparently ALL their graduates will go on to college. Here are the OUT OF STATE SCHOOLS the class of 2011 went to:

Amherst College Arizona State University Boston College Carnegie Mellon Cornell Dartmouth Drexel Duke Harvard Indiana University Johns Hopkins MIT NYU Northwestern Princeton Purdue Rhode Island School of Design Rice Tufts University of Arizona University of Chicago University of Denver University of Michigan University of Pennsylvania University of Washington Yale

Remember this list when someone tells you how great it is their kid is going to Brown, University of Virginia, North Carolina (unless he can play basketball), Texas, Texas A&M, etc.

12 posted on 01/13/2012 5:46:30 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark

Another “Invention” that makes you go, well why didn’t anyone try that before?

Seems quite simple when it’s explained.


13 posted on 01/13/2012 5:47:02 PM PST by Loyal Sedition
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Netizen

LOL, the government schools had nothing to do with her excellence, that’s for sure.


14 posted on 01/13/2012 5:47:25 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner
Now put her to work on the economy.

Hell! Many great minds have that figured out. The problem is all the powerful, vested interests who want to keep things just the way they are.

15 posted on 01/13/2012 5:48:30 PM PST by sinanju (ua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark
Angela's idea was to mix cancer medicine in a polymer that would attach to nanoparticles -- nanoparticles that would then attach to cancer cells and show up on an MRI. so doctors could see exactly where the tumors are. Then she thought shat if you aimed an infrared light at the tumors to melt the polymer and release the medicine, thus killing the cancer cells while leaving healthy cells completely unharmed.

Pretty anazing stuff!

16 posted on 01/13/2012 5:49:14 PM PST by Brandonmark (2012: Our Hope IS Change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark; All

When (hopefully this is it) a cure “gets out”, i.e., can’t be smothered by the “industry”, it will pop a large part of the healthcare bubble.

Which is why it is extremely foolish to have 25% of GDP be comprised of healthcare.


17 posted on 01/13/2012 5:50:23 PM PST by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner
Now put her to work on the economy.

Oh, by curing cancer she's done wonders for social security.

18 posted on 01/13/2012 5:50:45 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

Oh, sorry, 17%. Still high, should be somewhere around 10%, IMHO.


19 posted on 01/13/2012 5:51:39 PM PST by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark; listenhillary; spankalib; Jeff Chandler; basil; Netizen; therightliveswithus; ...

This has been the dream of decades; how to find a way to deliver those nasty chemotherapy poisons exclusively to the tumors on the cellular level. So it has finally been cracked.

Now the problem is all those Lefty Luddites for whom “nanoparticles” are the new DDT.


20 posted on 01/13/2012 5:53:32 PM PST by sinanju (ua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark

I know it’s cynical, but I expect 2 or 3 weeks we’ll rad she’s being sud by the AMA, facing charges by California by a whole slew of charges from Practicing Medicine without a License to Animal cruelty, and the IRS is auditing her and family.


21 posted on 01/13/2012 5:53:41 PM PST by theDentist (FYBO/FUBO; qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspelll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The KG9 Kid

I guess it’s a good thing she wasn’t aborted.


22 posted on 01/13/2012 5:53:41 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

If you want more of an item, subsidize it. Our government has been doing that for 50 years.


23 posted on 01/13/2012 5:54:51 PM PST by listenhillary (Look your representatives in the eye and ask if they intend to pay off the debt. They will look away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Netizen
This can’t be. She attends one of those crappy public high schools and we are told they are all worthless. /S

They are, but she isn't.

24 posted on 01/13/2012 5:55:41 PM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
Billions.
25 posted on 01/13/2012 5:56:18 PM PST by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Meanwhile, at the science fair:

You made a stupid lemon clock...I CURED CANCER!!!


26 posted on 01/13/2012 5:56:19 PM PST by ak267
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

It’ll take years to know if it works in humans — but in mice — the tumors almost completely disappeared.

Wonder how many people will suffer an agonizing death while we wait on the FDA to determine if this approach is “safe” to use on humans.


27 posted on 01/13/2012 6:01:42 PM PST by phoneman08 (Reagan conservative union member. Not a s rare as you think!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark

28 posted on 01/13/2012 6:02:03 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pride in the USA; Stillwaters

Wowser. Best of luck and much success in all your endeavors, Angela! God speed.


29 posted on 01/13/2012 6:16:26 PM PST by lonevoice (Klepto Baracka Marxo, impeach we much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary

they will fight her because they make so much more when there isn’t a cure..........


30 posted on 01/13/2012 6:21:34 PM PST by yldstrk ( My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark

The cancer treatment with micro particle that release cancer drug in cancer cell only is in current practice . Mr. Rudy Giuliani has been treated in that way for his prostate cancer at the beginning of his campaign for the US senator from NY(Hillary was his opponent).


31 posted on 01/13/2012 6:27:13 PM PST by cambyses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark

The answers to the most difficult questions can be found in the most unlikely of places.


32 posted on 01/13/2012 6:31:51 PM PST by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark

A great accomplishment for someone her age regardless. Her idea is similar to that developed by another audodidact, John Kanzius, who came up with the idea of delivering metallic nanoparticles rather than cancer drugs directly to tumor sites, and then using RF energy to destroy them without damaging nearby tissues. His method is now going into clinical testing:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanzius_RF_Therapy

Brilliant minds don’t need massive governmental programs, they just need the freedom to explore and create.


33 posted on 01/13/2012 6:33:10 PM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark
"Angela's idea was to mix cancer medicine in a polymer that would attach to nanoparticles -- nanoparticles that would then attach to cancer cells and show up on an MRI so doctors could see exactly where the tumors are. Then she thought that if you aimed an infrared light at the tumors to melt the polymer and release the medicine, thus killing the cancer cells while leaving healthy cells completely unharmed.

"I think it was more of a -- 'This is really cool, I want to see if it works' -- type thing," she said.

"And when you found out it did..." asked Hartman.

"That was pretty amazing."

It'll take years to know if it works in humans -- but in mice -- the tumors almost completely disappeared."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Well, that seals it. This cancer treatment will never see the light of day. Wouldn't want to endanger all those billions in cancer research grants, or inhibit the sickness industry in any way.

Priorities, you know...

34 posted on 01/13/2012 6:37:49 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark

I don’t know what the chemicals are, but I sure how the reaction doesn’t release any CO2 particles... California will immediately tag it with a per-molecule cap and trade carbon tax


35 posted on 01/13/2012 6:49:50 PM PST by FunkyZero (... I've got a Grand Piano to prop up my mortal remains)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinanju

“”The problem is all the powerful, vested interests who want to keep things just the way they are.””

Including finding a cure for cancer. Does anyone really believe this student found something that billions of dollars of research hasn’t found? It’s been found all right but will never reach the market.


36 posted on 01/13/2012 6:57:06 PM PST by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark
Angela's idea was to mix cancer medicine in a polymer that would attach to nanoparticles -- nanoparticles that would then attach to cancer cells and show up on an MRI. so doctors could see exactly where the tumors are. Then she thought shat if you aimed an infrared light at the tumors to melt the polymer and release the medicine, thus killing the cancer cells while leaving healthy cells completely unharmed.

Is this science fact? (I seriously don't know)

Are there "nanoparticles" that can differentiate between healthy cells and cancer cells and attach themselves?

The way I'm reading this...that science/capability exists and Angela's idea is the addition of the melt-able, medicated polymer to the existing, cancer-cell-attaching-nanoparticles.

If the cancer-cell-attaching-nanoparticles don't currently exist (or are not know to be possible) then isn't this just a "wouldn't it be cool if..." story?

37 posted on 01/13/2012 6:58:59 PM PST by Washi (Surviving the Zombie Apocalypse, one head-shot at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sinanju

I hope no one steals her work. She probably doesn’t even worry about that.


38 posted on 01/13/2012 7:13:50 PM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark
Angela's idea was to mix cancer medicine in a polymer that would attach to nanoparticles -- nanoparticles that would then attach to cancer cells and show up on an MRI. so doctors could see exactly where the tumors are. Then she thought shat if you aimed an infrared light at the tumors to melt the polymer and release the medicine, thus killing the cancer cells while leaving healthy cells completely unharmed.

I believe that Pyramid Diagnostics labs was doing something similar back in the late 80s, early 90s, but were using radioactive isotopes, rather than anti-cancer meds.

The only reason I'm aware of this is that I helped install the network at one of their locations, I believe in TN, but it's been so long I really can't recall. It was weird hearing a gieger counter clicking all the time, and the lab employees REALLY freaked when I threw a printer test page in the trash. Turns out it was marked with the radioactive symbol, and the Dept of Energy seemed to frown on that sort of thing... Nothing was actually radioactive, it's just the paper was marked with the warning symbol.

Mark

39 posted on 01/13/2012 7:14:57 PM PST by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Loyal Sedition

how do the nanoparticles know which cells are cancerous to attach to?


40 posted on 01/13/2012 7:22:01 PM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Go Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark
Dang - they'll never move on this! Cancer is the cash-cow of medicine and doctors... they DON"T WANT a cure!

There have been two doctors that cured cancer - I know because I saw it happen to a friend - cancer gone! But, they hounded the guy out of this country (went to Canada) that came up with the cure.

The second guy that cured literally hundreds was also ran out of the country (went to Mexico.)

If this little gal gets too good at it, the medical interests will go after her just like they always do.

41 posted on 01/13/2012 7:30:16 PM PST by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

No real idea, I suspect there is a difference in proteins or some such that is exploited to mark the correct cells.


42 posted on 01/13/2012 7:37:02 PM PST by Loyal Sedition
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark; decimon

decimon, did you see this yet?


43 posted on 01/13/2012 8:03:59 PM PST by TEXOKIE (... and HAPPY NEW YEAR to all FREEPERS EVERYWHERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thank You Rush

“Does anyone really believe this student found something that billions of dollars of research hasn’t found?”

Bingo! That’s what I thought. Nothing new under the sun.


44 posted on 01/13/2012 8:08:55 PM PST by logitech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

CA #1

Good for her!


45 posted on 01/13/2012 8:11:49 PM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Thank You Rush
Does anyone really believe this student found something that billions of dollars of research hasn’t found?

Probably not, but she got up to speed on her own. That gives her a head-start on making further progress if she decides to make a career of it.

46 posted on 01/13/2012 8:20:37 PM PST by RansomOttawa (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
A propos of nothing important, but is anyone as confused as I over the name of the high school - Monta Vista? Am I missing something? What is Monta?
47 posted on 01/13/2012 8:35:07 PM PST by ArmyTeach (Our liberties we prize and our rights we will maintain ... USS Iowa BB 61)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark

This is why there should be less restrictions on any medical care or research. Let curiosity, ambition, and the market place take care of everything. Every cure is already here; Gd just wants us to find them all.


48 posted on 01/13/2012 8:35:07 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark; All

Here’a a link to a story from 3/10/2010 about similar research at Cornell...

http://www.nanotech-now.com/news.cgi?story_id=37153

Nanotech has been around for years, the idea of using cell-level identification and destruction has been for quite a while.

I’m not sure where this HS student’s work fits in.

Is CBS just babbling ? I don’t know.

Is the healthcare industry maximizing revenue ? I’m sure it is.

Will we get a very effective and low-cost complete cure someday ? Yes, I guess “someday”, though, of course, the healthcare industry would prefer to do the initial rollout of the cure in an extremely high-cost fashion.

Is there any chance we might see drastic improvements soon ? I guess there’s a chance, but the “complete cure” is at odds with the structure and dynamics of the healthcare marketplace. Consequently, the “complete cure” approach is not the primary focus of R & D.

If somehow the healthcare industry had it’s profitability aligned with both solution effectiveness and cost would scientific advances increase and costs decrease at astoundingly fast rates ? Yes, but first someone has to develop a working industry model that would achieve this alignment along with a transition plan, and then the industry would have to be incentivized in such a way that they would opt to make the transition.

IMHO.


49 posted on 01/13/2012 9:23:55 PM PST by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Washi; bigbob
Are there "nanoparticles" that can differentiate between healthy cells and cancer cells and attach themselves?

I don't think so. I have read about the John Kanzius invention, where carbon nanotubes are heated with RF energy to kill cancer cells. The nanoparticles don't find their own way from systemic administration, they have to be manually placed on target - so that remains the challenge. Others are experimenting with things like particle shaping, antibody coating, etc. to attain the self targeting objective. That would be BIG.

Still, both of these methods (from self taught individuals no less) hold a lot of promise.

50 posted on 01/13/2012 9:38:28 PM PST by Clinging Bitterly (We need to limit political office holders to two terms. One in office, and one in prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson