Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Santorum Endorsement Doesn't Impress Churchgoers (Rick Blasts, Promises to Fight " Big Business")
Little Green Footballs ^ | 12-15-2012 | Deborah Charles

Posted on 01/15/2012 2:26:15 PM PST by TitansAFC

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: Utmost Certainty

Wrong, this was another one of his Kerry moments, he opposed it before he supported, but he was supporting it when it passed. http://theiowarepublican.com/2011/newt%E2%80%99s-justification-for-supporting-tarp/


41 posted on 01/15/2012 3:35:04 PM PST by org.whodat (What is the difference in Newt's, Perry's and Willard's positions on Amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KyaxJKdg9So

It’s obvious Santorum said BLACK people. No other word in there makes sense. Santorum tried to play it off by alleging he really said, “blah people.” Come on, lol.

I know it’s just a gaffe and it’s not a big deal to me, but how he tried to cover it up is pretty funny.


42 posted on 01/15/2012 3:35:59 PM PST by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
Produce the copy of the letter where he supports TARP. It doesn't exist. I've read the letter signed by both Perry and Manchin and it does NOT even suggest congress pass TARP.

As a matter of fact, common sense says that if they wanted congress to pass TARP, they would have said so. It looks like they were pleading with congress to do something but did not get specific about what they wanted done.

43 posted on 01/15/2012 3:36:21 PM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

I was just hoping that where was some documentation of Santorum saying he opposed the Bush bailouts at the time of the Bush bailouts. If there is none then it might very well be that Santorum only decided he opposed the bailouts when the Tea Party made opposes them popular. My research thus far suggests that is the case. Or put another way Santorum only opposed them when it was popular to do so. Oh Paul voted against the bush bailouts so he is no record of opposing them. I’m going to see if I can any documentation on Perry too, since both are making that claim a big part of their campaign.


44 posted on 01/15/2012 3:36:47 PM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
There’s a reason most of his supporters don’t seem to care if Romney wins SC

This supporter does care, which is why I am supporting someone other than Mitt Romney. Get it?

45 posted on 01/15/2012 3:41:27 PM PST by Hoodat (Because they do not change, Therefore they do not fear God. -Psalm 55:19-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Why are you attempting to spam this thread about your 4% man?//? Go support his vulture attacks on capitalism on a perry thread and stop attacking Santorum.


46 posted on 01/15/2012 3:41:37 PM PST by org.whodat (What is the difference in Newt's, Perry's and Willard's positions on Amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife; Jim Robinson

“My dear. You are not listening. I linked and quoted Dr. Jack Wheeler. If you have a beef about what he said, go tell him. Perhaps he will give you more information.”

My good woman, you linked to lies and your post should be pulled. The man denigrated Conservative Christian leaders because they care about “morality first” and then libeled them by saying they had an agenda to get Santorum forced on Romney. This is just a lie. It isn’t a distortion, it is a lie. MAYBE YOU should read garbage before posting quotes from it. I have never disliked Perry, but IF you and “Wheeler” are indicative of the types he attracts, then I guess I’m going to have to be actively against Perry.

And you are as guility as the person committing “libel” when you propagate it.


47 posted on 01/15/2012 3:45:37 PM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
Well it certainly looks like Perry supported the bailouts

This morning the Chairman of the Democratic Governors Association, Governor Joe Manchin, and the Chairman of the Republican Governors Association, Governor Rick Perry, released a joint letter to Congress urging them to pass an economic recovery package.

As leaders of our respective organizations, we don't always see eye to eye on policy, but we come together today with one clear purpose. We strongly urge Congress to leave partisanship at the door and pass an economic recovery package. We both believe that it’s time to stand together for our country.

There is a time for partisanship and there is a time for getting things done. No one likes the hand they've been dealt, and now is not the time to assign blame. It is time for Washington, D.C. to step up, be responsible and do what's in the best interest of American taxpayers and our economy.

This economic crisis is not just impacting Wall Street; it is also making life harder for everyday Americans. Americans across the country and in every demographic are feeling the pinch. If Congress does not act soon, the situation will grow appreciably worse. It's time for leadership. Congress needs to act now.

48 posted on 01/15/2012 3:46:43 PM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

LOL, I am sure operations research has looked long and hard, I gave you the links about newt and perry you can make up your own mind. As to who is spinning what.


49 posted on 01/15/2012 3:47:45 PM PST by org.whodat (What is the difference in Newt's, Perry's and Willard's positions on Amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife; Jim Robinson

“If we unify behind Santorum, it will force Romney to pick him as his running mate - for he’ll know that’s the only way to get our support in the general (election in November).”

Once again...to clarify. This is the offending statement you quoted from Wheeler’s remarks. WHO said this? Wheeler doesn’t say....it is HIS spin not an actual quote. He should be sued for libel and person like yourself that pass this trash along as fact should suffer the same.


50 posted on 01/15/2012 3:52:30 PM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: All

.

Santorum has not been vetted.
Has anybody taken a good look at his voting record?
Below is just some of the worst:

RICK SANTORUM

VOTED AGAINST INCREASING THE NUMBER OF IMMIGRATION INVESTIGATORS
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00201

VOTED TO ALLOW ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS TO RECEIVE THE EARNED INCOME CREDIT BEFORE BECOMING CITIZENS
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00154

VOTED TO GIVE SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS TO ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=105&session=1&vote=00058

SANTORUM: TRIM SOCIAL SECURITY NOW- EVEN IF PAINFUL.http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j7O34Bpp42k-IlMMNiOLBkYF2zNw?docId=b1cff9ecefe24ca6ae1764a09761e361

VOTED TO GIVE WELFARE BENEFITS TO NATURALIZED CITIZENS without regard to to the earnings of their sponsors
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=104&session=1&vote=00427

VOTED AGAINST HIRING AN ADDITIONAL 1,000 BORDER PATROL AGENTS, paid for by reductions in state grants.
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00179

VOTED AGAINST FOOD STAMP REFORM
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00353

VOTED AGAINST MEDICAID REFORM
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00352

VOTED TO INCREASE THE SOCIAL SERVICES BLOCK GRANT FROM $1 BILLION to $2 BILLION
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&session=1&vote=00302

VOTED TO RAID SOCIAL SECURITY instead of using surpluses to pay down the debt.
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&session=2&vote=00056

VOTED TO IMPOSE A UNIFORM FEDERAL MANDATE ON STATES TO FORCE THEM TO ALLOW CONVICTED RAPISTS, ARSONISTS, DRUG KINGPINS AND ALL OTHER EX-CONVICTS TO VOTE IN FEDERAL ELECTIONS.
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=2&vote=00031

VOTED AGAINST INCREASING THE NUMBER OF IMMIGRATION INVESTIGATORS?
VOTED TO GIVE WELFARE BENEFITS TO NATURALIZED CITIZENS?
VOTED AGAINST HIRING AN ADDITIONAL 1,000 BORDER PATROL AGENTS?
VOTED AGAINST FOOD STAMP REFORM?
VOTED AGAINST MEDICAID REFORM?

People NEED to know this about Santorum’s voting record.

.


51 posted on 01/15/2012 3:53:12 PM PST by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

So far the only one I know for a FACT that did not support the bailout is Paul. Still trying to find something on Santorum to back up his claim that he didn’t.


52 posted on 01/15/2012 3:53:49 PM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: magritte

Seriously? It was Newt and Perry that supported TARP while Santorum was againt it. It’s also Newt and Perry that are leading current attacks on capitalism


53 posted on 01/15/2012 3:57:45 PM PST by bjcoop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma
You said tarp is different from the bailout, wrong, tarp was the bailouts, and it was the only bailout. I know of no other bailout. Except maybe some payments made to the part of chrysler that built Tanks. But then that company was taken over by a government corporation and tanks were no longer built in the free market.
54 posted on 01/15/2012 3:58:12 PM PST by org.whodat (What is the difference in Newt's, Perry's and Willard's positions on Amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: patriot08

What candidate are you supporting and why should he be POTUS?


55 posted on 01/15/2012 3:59:36 PM PST by writer33 (Mark Levin Is The Constitutional Engine Of Conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: patriot08

You can pull that type of garbage out of any omnibus bill. Where your man, if he was in office, voted for the same crap, since no one reads the 5000 page bills. And actually no one votes for them since they refuse to do a roll call vote.


56 posted on 01/15/2012 4:04:48 PM PST by org.whodat (What is the difference in Newt's, Perry's and Willard's positions on Amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Quoting Little Green Footballs> You’ve pretty much become Newt’s Baghdad Bob at FR.


57 posted on 01/15/2012 4:07:48 PM PST by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
Santorum left the Senate in January of 2007. TARP was voted on in October 2008.

You are starting to become a bad joke at FR with your constant shilling and misinformation.

58 posted on 01/15/2012 4:15:02 PM PST by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

The vote and all it’s confusion says very little about a real unification coming out of the meeting.......

snip
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jan/14/evangelical-leaders-pick-santorum-third-ballot/?page=2

The FRC said these numbers represented the ballot results:

First Ballot
Ron Paul 1
Mitt Romney 3
Rick Perry 13
Newt Gingrich 48
Rick Santorum 57

Second Ballot (two top vote recipients)
Mr. Gingrich 49
Mr. Santorum 70
(59-41% for Santorum)

Third Ballot
Mr. Gingrich 29
Mr. Santorum 85
(74.5% - 25.5% for Santorum)

end snip

From the numbers above the 1st ballot had 122 total votes and it went down from that. Supposedly the 3rd vote was taken in order to get the 2/3rds requirement they set for an endorsement statement.


59 posted on 01/15/2012 4:25:17 PM PST by deport (..............God Bless Texas............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

All contributions are for the
Current Quarter Expenses.


Donate Today!

60 posted on 01/15/2012 4:26:26 PM PST by RedMDer (Forward With Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson