Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Beelzebubba
The problem with getting laws relaxed on silencers is the hollywierd image of what they are and capable of.

They wont reduce the sound to a whisper and you wont be using one on long range rifles. They only work at subsonic ballistics.

10 posted on 01/16/2012 8:22:56 AM PST by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Beagle8U
They wont reduce the sound to a whisper

True, unless the round is subsonic which they get pretty quiet, but they do allow you to use a range without ear protection comfortably.

you wont be using one on long range rifles.

Oh yeah, you will. Have used on .338 Lapua

They only work at subsonic ballistics

Not true. They reduce muzzle blast in all cases. Subsonic rounds reduce the sound of the projectile downrange.

11 posted on 01/16/2012 8:32:50 AM PST by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Beagle8U

Actually, silencers are very useful for supersonic rounds. They won’t affect the “crack” of the shockwave (which is of little harm to the shooter’s ears) but they do a great job on the muzzle blast.

Also, the “crack” depends on the size of the projectile. With a 223 or 17 it’s pretty minimal (an airplane is another matter).


14 posted on 01/16/2012 9:04:09 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Author of BullionBible.com - Makes You a Precious Metal Expert, Guaranteed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson