Replies

MMaschin: “If on the other hand, judge Malihi decides he want’s to punt on this. Then Obama’s lawyers not presenting any evidence might allow him to do so.”

As you may know, there is more than just these cases from Orly before this same judge. There is also a case concerning NBC which does not require any COLB to be entered into evidence. As a matter of fact the NBC case (being litigated by the Liberty Legal Foundation) assumes the internet birth certificate is correct and that the “document” laid claim that Obama’s father was not a US citizen.

I don’t see how the judge cannot rule on this question in some manner - the issue will be whether this challenge is debated on it’s merit or if it will be resolved based on some technical matter. If the judge rules on the issue of NBC, then that allows this matter to be appealed and perhaps it will receive it’s day in court...

There are only three things that judge Malihi is concerned with in each case - 1) is Obama older than 35, 2) has he resided in the US for at least 14 years, and 3) is he a US natural born Citizen.

The judge isn't going to care about Obama's SSN, or whether or not the BC he has on his website is fraudulent - because it doesn't matter. Even if those things Orly is arguing about are true, being a felon does not make someone ineligble for the office of President. The only thing that does matter are the 3 points from the first paragraph. So, I completely ignore Orly's case.

When the judge denied the defenses Motion to Dismiss, he didn't wait for the plaintiffs response to the MOD first, he siad it was irrelavant, because he was denying the MOD. My previous post expresses fear that a similar thig could happen here - the defense does not provide proof of something, such as Obama's age, and the judge stops the hearing because he has enough information for his ruling. Thereby the issue of NBC, and Minor being precedent never comes up.