Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Perry backs Gingrich, but his donors may prefer Romney(LA Times delusions)
latimes ^ | January 19, 2012, 12:10 p.m. | Melanie Mason and Matea Gol

Posted on 01/19/2012 12:41:27 PM PST by Red Steel

In endorsing Newt Gingrich's presidential bid, Rick Perry may have thrown some votes over to the former House Speaker in the upcoming South Carolina primary. But it's no guarantee that the Texas governor's financial backers will follow.

While many of Perry's evangelical Christian donors in Texas could find Gingrich appealing, fundraisers from the establishment wing of the GOP are more likely to gravitate to former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney.

Indeed, one top Perry fundraiser -- Dirk Van Dongen, a lobbyist who co-chaired the governor's fundraising efforts in Washington -- signed on to the Romney camp Thursday morning.

"I would guess that some will stay on the sidelines, but the majority will come to the Romney camp because I think most people do see Romney as highly likely to be the nominee and regard him as the best able to beat Obama," said veteran GOP fundraiser Fred Malek.

Malek is a Perry admirer who had remained neutral for much of the primary because of his work raising money for the Republican Governors Assn. But in late November, he quietly joined Romney's national finance committee.

Malek said Perry's endorsement of Gingrich would have "minimal" impact on donors.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: newt; perry
While many of Perry's evangelical Christian donors in Texas could find Gingrich appealing, fundraisers from the establishment wing of the GOP are more likely to gravitate to former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney.

LoL LA Times. Your wishful thinking is not going to work. They won't go to Romney.

1 posted on 01/19/2012 12:41:33 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Hard to get people that have made money to support you when you are calling them names. This is probably one of the reasons perry left, his money people were pissed.


2 posted on 01/19/2012 12:52:21 PM PST by org.whodat (Sorry bill, I should never had made all those jokes about you and Lewinsky, have fun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

so youre saying the republican establishment doesnt want romney?....make up your mind...or do you just react without reading


3 posted on 01/19/2012 12:53:09 PM PST by skaterboy (Hate=Love....Love=Hate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Oh wow. The MSM does a story about “divisions within the Republican Party.” That’s a new one.


4 posted on 01/19/2012 12:56:02 PM PST by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skaterboy
What I'm saying is that the LA Times also want Romney along with the Dems to be the Republican Pres. candidate because they, the liberals, Obama believe their best chance of winning is defeating Mittens as the Repub. candidate in the general election.

Perry is the on the right to the moderate Mittens, and the LA Times are suggesting that his donors will run to Mittens who is located on the left of the political spectrum? LoL. Noway. Perry's donors and supporters are likely to go to Gingrich or Santorum as Perry's donors and supporters are on the right of the political spectrum to Mittens. It's preposterous to suggest otherwise in their headline of this LA Slimes article that they would flock to Romney.

5 posted on 01/19/2012 1:08:48 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: skaterboy

And moreover, the LA Times people are still delusional.


6 posted on 01/19/2012 1:10:24 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

“Perry’s donors “

dont know about his supporters but some of his donors did jump to Romney already


7 posted on 01/19/2012 1:41:17 PM PST by DM1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Romney, Gingrich split Perry's 2 biggest SC supporters: Mitt gets former Amb. David Wilkins, Newt gets House Speaker Bobby Harrell.

Wilkins seems to be the money guy
Ambassador David H. Wilkins is a partner at Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP and chairs the Public Policy and International Law practice group, which focuses primarily on representing businesses on both sides of the US-Canadian border and offers experience on a wide range of strategic bilateral issues.

8 posted on 01/19/2012 1:47:04 PM PST by byteback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DM1

Finding “some” donors or supporters by the LA Times doesn’t make their point. It’s misleading and illogical. Any former Perry supporters that jump to Romney is not based on political ideological grounds. Perry, as his supporters, are more politically aligned with Gingrich and Santorum, and therefore, most will support those two in the up coming elections. Just like Governor Perry who has now endorsed Gingrich.


9 posted on 01/19/2012 1:52:32 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DM1
dont know about his supporters but some of his donors did jump to Romney already

A few big money guys who operate on some "other standard" but the bulk of Perry voters won't go to Romney.

10 posted on 01/19/2012 1:57:40 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
In my view, in which few are in agreement, Perry was the best candidate in the field. With his experience, strong conservative platform and solid personal life, he has the ingredients to be a great POTUS.

I was disappointed when he endorsed Gingrich, someone I will not support.

11 posted on 01/19/2012 2:09:54 PM PST by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DM1
dont know about his supporters but some of his donors did jump to Romney already

Any of his donors jumping to Romney were not Conservatives to begin with.
12 posted on 01/19/2012 9:54:54 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

This is where Santorum needs to get behind Newt.


13 posted on 01/19/2012 9:59:32 PM PST by txhurl (WELL, Santorum? Still in it for yourself?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

ANY backers of failed candidates should throw their towel into the Ron Paul ring.

Make EVERYBODY think that Ron Paul IS a contender.


14 posted on 01/19/2012 10:03:10 PM PST by raygun (http://bastiat.org/en/the_law DOT html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson