Bill Maher
Andrew Stein, New York, Democrat Politican.
I'd go on and post them all but you get the picture. Ann is a left-winger, which tells you that her candidate Mittens Romeny is also a left-winger.
Posted on 01/22/2012 6:45:03 AM PST by stratboy
Look, I like Ann Coulter, but....she is dead wrong on this one!!! Mitt Romney had two debates in South Carolina to directly address both the Bain Capital issue & the Income Tax form release time & substance!!! IMHO, Mitt Romney addressed both in timid, meek, weak, ineffective response!!! I got so angry, because all I could think of was whimp, John McCain back in 2008 telling us what a good and decent man POTUS Barack Hussein Obama was and is!!! McCain stood by while Obama destroyed him for his weakness!!!
If Romney wants in this race, he best get his act together, tell like it is, and...start getting fire in his belly, by ripping the political heart out of POTUS Obama and his un-American Democrat party!!! the sooner romney realizes that Obama is out to destroy America, the better off he will be!!! Americans want a fighter for them and a strong, gutsy leader to oust this America destroyer Obama and hois evil ilk!!
Now, Mitt, if you can’t handle fighting for the life and future of this USA with your heart, soul, and...with every available political weapon at hand, then I suggest you withdraw from the race and join whimp John McCain is his continuing adoration of POTUS, Barack Hussein “Muslim Brotherhood Lover” Obama!!!
What a tacky thing to say.
I think it is instructive btw that, barely a month after establishment apologist George Will denied they existed, sort of like if John Gotti denied the Mafia ever existed, the media are now openly talking about the republican establishment as if they always did.
The adams apple bobs wildly when “MAnn” Coulter gets exercised. She/He has never been more unhinged.
Always.
You are right. Independents, or as they should correctly be called, apoliticals, have been hurt for being politically correct. Back people were fooled by thinking Obama was anything like them, and the rest of America thought, “Sure it’s time for a black President!”. But didn’t get a typically vetted one because the media was in on the scam.
And they all lost their jobs or their nest eggs or their houses!!!
They don’t want to vote for a conservative because the cool kids (Hollywood) say they are creepy, but they definitely don’t want to vote for the guy that hurt and tricked them.
So there is no reason to go soft on values to seduce the apoliticals. Time to show them what a Reagan President can bring.
Sandy Hume was a drunk who later killed himself, but I didn't know he was a homosexual. That fills in a couple blanks in the official story.
Mitt has already addressed the ‘Bain Capital’, and he knows full well his prior explanation is NOT going to sit well with ‘conservative’ voters... Only is mushy ‘rich’ republican circles, like Ann. I mean really now Mitt's wealth was gained just like Obama saved the auto industry... And Ann calls US cultists.... snicker.
I saw it, too. She also said that the SC Tea Party apparently requires nothing more than someone calling Obama a bunch of names. Isn’t that what her books consist of?
“I don’t think she sees Romney as all that conservative. I think she just believes Romney can win while Paul, Santorum and Romney can’t.”
She recently said Romney is the most conservative candidate in the race, and that was before Perry dropped out.
Their hatred or favoritism might be personal, but, if so, they need to be professional just like any military enlistee or schoolteacher or health care provider, etc.
Pundits of any alliance, left or right, can either admit their feelings and recuse themselves or put feelings and memories aside and do their jobs, or their audience will reject them.
The country’s future is actually more significant in the forum in which these pundits reside than anyone’s personal problems, as cold as that seems.
Anyone with a responsibility knows the greater good trumps personal matters within the scope of the job. Coulter et al will be marginalized when they do not keep this in mind.
that’s just order.
Natural order.
You've nailed it. It's been sickening to watch theh lamestream media fawning over the "Occupiers", as if they represent America, while they heaped contempt on the Tea Party. The way they pander to the poser in the White House.
And the one unspoken (so far) elephant in the room: Americans are sick to death of the bias that the media shows in reporting black-on-white crime. All over the country the vicious, unprovoked attacks on innocent white people by roving gangs of feral young blacks are always reported as random muggings by "youths", and it's NEVER a hate crime. Whereas, if a white person so much looks at a black the wrong way, or utters what could be perceived as a racial slur, the media screams it from the rooftops.
This presidential election year is shaping up to culminate in actual race wars, encouraged by the No. 1 Racist-in-Chief and his lackey Holder.
Bill Maher
Andrew Stein, New York, Democrat Politican.
I'd go on and post them all but you get the picture. Ann is a left-winger, which tells you that her candidate Mittens Romeny is also a left-winger.
I think what we are looking at is another Sharon Angle situation with Newt and you know how that turned out.
I agree with point #2. His failed marriages are going to be a problem. I don’t see moderate women jumping on the the bandwagon for a man that has had 2 affairs (and they sure aren’t going to like “the other woman”, Calisa).You can bet the media will be playing up what a wonderful family man Obama is. If Newt were running against Bill Clinton it probably would not have mattered (although it may have been like that sexual harrassment skit on SNL with Tom Brady where the women didn’t considerate it sexual harrassment when Tom did it but did when it was by a less attractive man).
Saw Ann, think she is dead wrong.
Saw Dick Morris, he didn’t think that the first question (which resulted in a Republican standing up to the media slime machine) had anything to do with the surge, but that other debate answers did.
I think he is wrong too. Newt didn’t sit back and take it, he took it to the lib. And then he took it to them again. I was jumping up and down.
Probably don’t need that Barf Alert......
Just sayin’
Hanging around with gay or married men is attractive to women who have trouble with commitment because they still gain the attention of men (which they are genetically programmed to seek) without the danger of a long-term sexual or emotional relationship.
The problem with this is that it is impossible to remain neutral when it comes to a destructive lifestyle. Take, for example, a friend who might have a drinking problem. This person might be an otherwise wonderful human being, who just has a problem with his/her drinking. But, if you are around this person long enough, a decent and rational person has no choice but to notice the destructive nature of your friend's behavior. You either then have to confront the friend, or change your own morality and values. If you choose to confront, you will most likely lose the friend. If not, then you will increasingly be dragged into more and more uncomfortable situations (for you), until you have to break off the relationship. Or, you can change your mind, and salvage your friendship ("Oh, that's just the way he is. There's nothing wrong with it... it's him."). This is why peer pressure is so powerful.
So let's take a hypothetical. You have gay friends, and you are struggling with your moral doubts about their lifestyle. Then you get put in a situation where you have to either compromise your morals and go along to keep your friends ("Hey, Ann, go over there and tell that guy I think he's cute."), or take a stand and lose everything. The easier path is to just tell yourself that your friend is a good person (which he may be in every other respect), and that his behavior is just the way he is. And now you are a "live-and-let-live" gay rights supporter.
So, having come to her stealth morality change, who would Ann support? Not Santorum (for obvious reasons)! And Newt, as randy as his past life has been, is firmly hetero... with a social philosophy to match. But we all know Romney is just giving lip service to "conservative values" (so much so that your "friend" Drudge is fully on his bandwagon). Well, Romney it is...
Just my guess... but I'd be surprised if that wasn't part of it...
OMGGG Monk that priceless ROFL
Ann Coulter is now Fonzie LOL!
Not that it will stop her, but someone should tell Ann that Peggy Noonan already has the job she's trying out for and is better at it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.