Skip to comments.
Court won't hear arguments demanding Kagan recusal
Google.com ^
| 1/23/12
| AP
Posted on 01/23/2012 10:21:45 AM PST by ColdOne
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
1
posted on
01/23/2012 10:21:51 AM PST
by
ColdOne
To: ColdOne
Kagan, who was solicitor general under Obama, did not participate in the decision. LIE! Her own e-mails say different.
2
posted on
01/23/2012 10:30:41 AM PST
by
liberalh8ter
(I don't like what the world has become....)
To: ColdOne
Looks like the fix is in on this one boys and girls.
3
posted on
01/23/2012 10:30:45 AM PST
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
("The price of freedom is willingness to do sudden battle anywhere, anytime..." - Robert A. Heinlein)
To: ColdOne
4
posted on
01/23/2012 10:30:59 AM PST
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
To: ColdOne
Gotta Love Dissociated Press:
The law is aimed at extending health insurance coverage to more than 30 million previously uninsured people and would, by 2019, leave just 5 percent of the population uninsured, compared with about 17 percent today, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
RME....
5
posted on
01/23/2012 10:31:19 AM PST
by
Cyber Liberty
("If the past sits in judgment on the present, the future will be lost." --Winston Churchill)
To: ColdOne
I just love how they write these articles.
The question is about recusal. They label the group “consrevative” - then talk about the uninsured. WTF do the uninsured have to do with the legal question of recusal? Noting. Zero. Should not even be mentioned - until at least her ROLE IN PROMOTING THE LEGALITY THE IDEA TO THE PRESIDENT is covered. But - story omits the pertinant data, to work in the propaganda angle.
At least they are consistent.
6
posted on
01/23/2012 10:32:50 AM PST
by
Eldon Tyrell
(question,.)
To: ColdOne
It’s just as well. Obamacare is going to have to be repealed. Letting the SCOTUS do it is the coward’s way.
7
posted on
01/23/2012 10:34:04 AM PST
by
Sans-Culotte
( Pray for Obama- Psalm 109:8)
To: liberalh8ter
She was up to her ears in defending Obamacare, but I think this is supposed to mean she wasn’t part of the decision to refuse to hear arguments she should recuse herself.
Well maybe this is the burr America needs under its bustle to sweep the Obama administration out.
8
posted on
01/23/2012 10:34:51 AM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
To: liberalh8ter
She was up to her ears in defending Obamacare, but I think this is supposed to mean she wasn’t part of the decision to refuse to hear arguments she should recuse herself.
Well maybe this is the burr America needs under its bustle to sweep the Obama administration out.
9
posted on
01/23/2012 10:35:19 AM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
To: Eldon Tyrell
“Oh look what a wonderful law. Isn’t it worth a little cheating?”
Keep it up Lame Streamers. Soon all who listen to you will live in one square block in New York City.
10
posted on
01/23/2012 10:36:58 AM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
To: Sans-Culotte
Letting the SCOTUS do it is the cowards way.Yet, it may very well be the only way.
11
posted on
01/23/2012 10:37:25 AM PST
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: HiTech RedNeck
LOL. You’re probably right but that didn’t occur to me since it would be ridiculous for her to be impartial in determining whether or not she can be impartial on Obamacare.
12
posted on
01/23/2012 10:48:56 AM PST
by
liberalh8ter
(I don't like what the world has become....)
To: BenLurkin
It pisses me off to wait for the courts, congress should defund and picck it appart These career cowards won’t do sh**.
13
posted on
01/23/2012 10:50:00 AM PST
by
boomop1
(term limits is the only way to save this country.)
To: Puppage
Well, for the sake of this “wonderful law” America is about to embrace a doctrine of commerce clause enabled mandates on the level of requiring every American to buy one box of corn flakes every week. (If not also requiring it to be Kellogg’s corn flakes.) Fixing this will need a constitutional amendment, though a GOP-endorsed Federal law will stick a finger in that dike.
14
posted on
01/23/2012 10:59:41 AM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
To: ColdOne
Couple this with Thomas saying SCOTUS is “evading” Hussein’s eligibility problems. Looks like they’ve already taken sides.
15
posted on
01/23/2012 11:11:37 AM PST
by
bgill
(The Obama administration is staging a coup. Wake up, America, before it's too late.)
To: bgill
Now that Obama appointees are sitting on it, it would be the height of embarrassment to have to roll that back.
16
posted on
01/23/2012 11:25:18 AM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
To: boomop1
I'm sick to death of hearing this "defund, defund, defund" crap. The House passed budget bills. The Senate tabled them. Repeal died the same way.
"Defunding" won't mean a damned thing until it can actually get passed through as law.
17
posted on
01/23/2012 11:32:19 AM PST
by
newzjunkey
(Santorum has the Big Mo' right now in FL. /s)
To: liberalh8ter
Kagan, who was solicitor general under Obama, did not participate in the decision. LIE! Her own e-mails say different.
No, what the article means is that Kagan abstained from this vote (the vote not to hear arguments on whether she should be recused).
To: Sans-Culotte
I want both - the congress to defund and eliminate the ridiculous overreach and for the court to unequivocally state that they cannot force us to buy something.
19
posted on
01/23/2012 11:44:25 AM PST
by
reed13k
(Knight Rampant Bibliophile, Protector of Knowledge, Purveyor of Inquiry, Defender of Aged Wisdom, an)
To: Lurking Libertarian
Yes, HiTech RedNeck pointed that out. It didn't occur to me that it would even need to be mentioned that she didn't participate in this decision, how could she impartially do so? I would hope her only input would be answering questions about her involvement in Obamacare.
20
posted on
01/23/2012 11:56:01 AM PST
by
liberalh8ter
(I don't like what the world has become....)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson