[1rudeboy]

There should be a rule on FR (I can dream, can't I?) that people not comment on the constitutional implications of a court opinion before reading it.

After skimming it, it appears that Kernell intentionally commited a crime, bragged about it, was warned that the FBI would come looking, understood the FBI might come looking, and attempted to cover his tracks. Where's the 5th Amendment violation?

http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/12a0027p-06.pdf.

[HiTech RedNeck]

IMHO, even this fantasy of his, absent an actual notification from the Feds, should not have been held as tantamount to hearing from the government.