Newt Gingrich Is Right (NYT Ed on Fla)

NYT ^ | 12-3-12 | Rosenthal

[Grunthor]

Mitt Romney is not the G.O.P. nominee and God willing will never be the President.

[BlueJ7]

Can you tell Us when did he said that, I can easily find that what you are saying what he said, I you can not elaborate you are a big fat LIAR!

[GVnana]

Bump.

[liberalh8ter]

No, the committee that set the date also set that it was a winner take all primary. The rub is that the GOP has a rule that states if the primary is held before April 1, it cannot be winner take all.

[mquinn]

Not gonna happen, Mittbot.

[Right Wing Assault]

You sure this was in the NYT.

I imagine this agreeing with the unfairness of winner take all is setting the stage for the upcoming DNC push to make the prez election go to the highest popular vote and to get rid of the electoral college.

[jveritas]

Romney cannot defeat Obama. The majority of voters are not going to vote for an investment banker who founded Bain Capital where its main business is to sell and buy in companies and in the process many people lost their jobs but Bain Capital made money in almost every deal regardless of the company they bought going bust or not. I am not talking here about the OWS lunatics, I am talking about the regular folks and not matter how much Romney spins it, or Limbaugh spins it, or any and all on our side spin it, there is no way that Romney is going to survive his Bain Capital record in the general elections. Add to that all other stuff such as his comment on the very poor, paying 15% of taxes on his massive income, his total detachment from the regulars folks, his foreign bank accounts in countries, his wealth, etc... and Obama is going to crush this fool in historical proportions.

We need to choose wisely in these primaries and the wise choice is Gingrich.

[hoosiermama]

NPR via NYT
Newt leads Romney
39-32

[skaterboy]

lets post the ny times if it says newt was wronged....but tomorrow they will be a lib rag again?

[skaterboy]

romney no chance but newt would roll huh?....ya

[skaterboy]

what would reagan think of mitt?....the former dem ,reagan? the pro choice then pro life,reagan?.the great prez ever was fdr,reagan?..the liberal republican pa senator running mate then g h w bush, reagan? the amnesty ,reagan?...the barracks bombing in lebanon and running, reagan?...i think he would like mitt alot..what you think?...two peas in a pod it seems

[Cloverfarm]

The primaries aren't over yet. And, even though I am clear out here in fly-over country my vote should count. I'm tired of everyone saying “Mitt is it” when he's not, logically or mathematically.

[Randy Larsen]

Here on the left coast, I’ve given up on Limbaugh. I’m sick of his rants and half truths.

I now listen to Armstrong and Getty because they at least entertain my brain with thought provoking banter.

[TheWriterTX]

I’m thinking maybe there is a missing (SARC) tag?

[Proudcongal]

The primaries are over and Mitt won and even Rush Limbaugh believes we need to get behind the nominee and focus our energies on going after Obama.

The primaries have just begun, but more importantly, I will never vote for Romney. I will vote 3rd party, write in a candidate or stay home, but I will not vote for a candidate like Romney who is no better than Obama. Why would I waste my time or vote?

[JediJones]

Here are the other straight-up winner-take-all states...good news for Romney:
AZ
DC
DE
NJ
UT

These are winner-take-all only if the winner gets 50% of the vote (Newt needs to get his margin of victory up on these):
OK
AL

[seekthetruth]

FOR NEWT SUPPORTERS IN EVERY STATE!

http://newtgingrich360.com/

[VinL]

lets post the ny times if it says newt was wronged....but tomorrow they will be a lib rag again?

*********************
Not exactly. It is a left leaning newspaper today- and I suspect, it will be no different tomorrow.

In this instance, it merely adopted the correct position on the subject issue.

[Lazlo in PA]

Bleh.

[VinL]

what would reagan think of mitt?....the former dem ,reagan? the pro choice then pro life,reagan?.the great prez ever was fdr,reagan?..the liberal republican pa senator running mate then g h w bush, reagan? the amnesty ,reagan?...the barracks bombing in lebanon and running, reagan?...i think he would like mitt alot..what you think?...two peas in a pod it seems

***************
Pres. Reagan would have only to assess “Romneycare”-—to undercover where your man’s true leanings stood. What do you think?