Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: traditional1
From the article: (and he has always emphatically denied the accusations and never tested positive),...Novitsky had the resources but could not find the incontrovertible evidence that went beyond a matter of one man's word against another's ...never be a smoking gun, or a dripping syringe.

The bottom line is that they didn't have the evidence even to go to a grand jury.

Presumed innocent until proven guilty.

Therefore, Armstrong is innocent.

7 posted on 02/06/2012 7:13:23 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Pray Continued Victory for our Troops Still in Afghan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: xzins
Presumed innocent until proven guilty. Therefore, Armstrong is innocent.

No, he's presumed innocent, by some, and that does not make on innocent in fact, necessarily.

Notwithstanding that is the curious chain of events, which doesn't really involve guilt or innocence in the matter of cheating at a sport.

8 posted on 02/06/2012 7:25:04 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (religion + guns = liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson