Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Timber Rattler

Actually, my assertion, by explanation, was: it’s easy to win when you’re not running against anyone else competing for the same voters. But mostly it was just a dash of reality: if Newt had won when Sanctimonium wasn’t competing for the same voters, I’d only feel marginally positive, and realize it was a fluke... but I also understand Sanctimonium’s supporters have been a long time in the desert... I spent quite a bit of time there myself, I support Newt.


261 posted on 02/08/2012 12:44:46 PM PST by true believer forever (Save the Irish Setters - Vote Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: true believer forever
Your original statement on the Missouri results:

It would have been Newt 36 - Sanctimonium 19... [with Newt on the ballot]

Based on some mythical calculation.

That is laughable.

Actually, my assertion, by explanation, was: it’s easy to win when you’re not running against anyone else competing for the same voters.

But all 4 candidates were on the ballot in MN and CO and Santorum won there as well, and while Newt wasn't on the ballot in Missouri to take his 15%, Santorum dominated the voting by a huge margin. Except in your mind.

267 posted on 02/08/2012 1:18:21 PM PST by RygelXVI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson