!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: Sub-Driver
What have I missed here? And why would they vote to give the king any more power than he has already taken?
2 posted on
02/08/2012 5:07:41 PM PST by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
To: Sub-Driver
“Harry, what am I supposed to do with this?”
3 posted on
02/08/2012 5:10:29 PM PST by
jiggyboy
(Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: Sub-Driver
in a rare display of bipartisanship Hardly rare since they've done nothing this entire time but kiss his behind.
4 posted on
02/08/2012 5:10:33 PM PST by
bgill
(Romney & Obama are both ineligible. A non-NBC GOP prez shuts down all ?s on Obama's admin)
To: Sub-Driver
I wonder what the GOOBers have been smoking. They need to spread some around to the taxpayers.
5 posted on
02/08/2012 5:11:36 PM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
(So just where does the "buck stop" at the Department of "Justice"?)
To: Sub-Driver
Every one, both democrat and republican, who passed this bill are damn traitors, idiots, fools and liars and should be run out of America for the rest of their ignorant dumb as a bag of rocks stupidity.
What is wrong with the DC Congress. Is the water poisoned there. Has the idiots of the rino side lost every lick of sense they have?
6 posted on
02/08/2012 5:13:37 PM PST by
kindred
(Jesus Christ is the Lord God and Messiah of Israel, a present help in time of trouble.)
To: Sub-Driver
Good Lord, are they crazy?
7 posted on
02/08/2012 5:15:46 PM PST by
ltc8k6
To: Sub-Driver
Paul Ryan backed this??? Need a much more complete explanation. Giving Obama more power is madness.
8 posted on
02/08/2012 5:15:53 PM PST by
Truth29
To: Sub-Driver
I do believe they put stupid into the Washington DC water supply.
10 posted on
02/08/2012 5:27:24 PM PST by
kempo
To: Sub-Driver
WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON HERE?!!!
11 posted on
02/08/2012 5:33:52 PM PST by
Sequoyah101
(Half the people are below average.)
To: Sub-Driver
Fools. They just made themselves obsolete.
14 posted on
02/08/2012 5:43:42 PM PST by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: Sub-Driver
Why the heck would the House send Obama a bill where he can select what he wants or not?
18 posted on
02/08/2012 5:50:21 PM PST by
tobyhill
To: Sub-Driver
I guess the
LAME Stream Media will continue to defend
The ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT IN CHIEF.
They won't dare remember that
19 posted on
02/08/2012 5:53:20 PM PST by
Yosemitest
(It's simple, fight or die!)
To: Sub-Driver
What??
WHAT????????????
WTF IS THIS S**T?!?!?!?!???
Bleeding IDIOTS... Which side are the House Republicans ON???? It sure isn't OURS!
22 posted on
02/08/2012 6:05:27 PM PST by
Danae
(Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
To: Sub-Driver
It's good to be the king!
23 posted on
02/08/2012 6:06:29 PM PST by
Repeal The 17th
(We have met the enemy and he is us.)
To: Sub-Driver
Why give Obama a line-item veto power when the Dems won’t even give him a budget to use it on?
25 posted on
02/08/2012 6:37:51 PM PST by
TomGuy
To: Sub-Driver
Why these guys would give BO any more power at all is beyond me.
Please, Senate Republicans, kill this idiocy.
To: Sub-Driver
Imagine :
28 posted on
02/08/2012 6:57:01 PM PST by
tomkat
(para bellum)
To: Sub-Driver
The House voted 254-173, with 57 Democrats joining Republicans in favoring the bill, which allows the president to propose elimination of individual items in spending legislation and subject them to a separate, second vote by Congress. Not exactly a line item veto, but more a presidential power to require a second vote on specific items. Didn't see anything that would require anything more than a majority vote to agree or disagree during a second vote.
32 posted on
02/08/2012 7:27:15 PM PST by
Will88
To: Sub-Driver
This is a friggin' Constitutional DISASTER!
Every yes vote must be removed from office.
This is likely to pass the Senate and would certainly be signed by POTUS.
34 posted on
02/08/2012 8:42:06 PM PST by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: Sub-Driver
This makes sense.
Now Obama’s got zero excuses for not passing a budget. Congress sends it to him, and he vetoes the stuff he wants to veto.
It then goes back to Congress for a second vote. As such, it isn’t really a veto, in that it doesn’t get overriden.
The stuff he wants to cut goes into a bill, or several bills for up and down votes.
I don’t see a problem with this.
35 posted on
02/08/2012 8:48:54 PM PST by
RinaseaofDs
(Does beheading qualify as 'breaking my back', in the Jeffersonian sense of the expression?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson