Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/10/2012 2:29:56 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

Sure would be nice to have a fiscal conservative instead. Sigh.


2 posted on 02/10/2012 2:33:34 PM PST by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
I heard these clips of Rick's speech at CPAC.

Very strong articulation of conservatism.

3 posted on 02/10/2012 2:37:44 PM PST by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star recipient!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Sounds like he’s had his 3rd big million dollar fundraising day in a row.


4 posted on 02/10/2012 2:39:36 PM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Good old Rush. Running to where he can feel to be on the “winning” side like always.

Another one of those clowns that participated in the Florida smear job.


5 posted on 02/10/2012 2:39:45 PM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Santorum was OK, but he just does not have many specific plans to revitalize the economy he can point to. It was a good speech for CPAC, but Newt’s more comprehensive agenda is superior.


8 posted on 02/10/2012 2:49:00 PM PST by mtrott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Not a bad rant. But Rush still won't admit what the real problem is.

"Why would an undecided voter vote for a candidate of a party who the party is not excited about?" This is something the Republican establishment often overlooks.

Hell, no, they don't overlook it. They know damned well what will happen. But they'd rather lose the race than nominate someone who might cut government back and take away any of their beloved PORK.

Rush thinks that they've been pulling this stuff for 40 or 50 years, and they still DON'T GET IT? Don't make me laugh. They're not that dumb, they are greedy, power-drunk, and corrupt, through and through.

9 posted on 02/10/2012 2:49:08 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

When it comes down to it I can support Newt or Rick in this thing.

I will not lower myself to support Mitt or Ron.

I would love to see a Newt/Rick ticket with either one being the others VP.


10 posted on 02/10/2012 2:54:22 PM PST by Jack Burton007 (This is Jack Burton in the Pork Chop Express, and I'm talkin' to whoever's listenin' out there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Please not Santorum. I can’t believe this is where we are. Rick Santorum? He lost his last election by 17 points. His social values are rock solid but his fiscal values are moderate and tend toward more government in our lives.


11 posted on 02/10/2012 2:54:55 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I watched Santorum’s whole speech. The content was good. If I had read it as an Op-Ed piece it would have been fine but no matter the message, as a speech, as communication, as sales, as inspiration or persuasion it sucked. Rick Santorum could make “you just one the lottery” boring. I genuinely like the guy and I would vote for him happily against Obama but I don’t think he can go head to head with Obama in the media today and not lose badly. Gingrich has all kinds of problems and he has the potential to implode at anytime but when he is on his game he is truly inspiring and could KO Obama. Santorum is so bad in the Charisma department that he make Mitt Romney seem like Ed McMahon.


12 posted on 02/10/2012 2:59:00 PM PST by azcap (Who is John Galt ? www.conservativeshirts.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Governor Palin supports Speaker Gingrich before S.C. and Newt takes it walking away. Rush’s giant ego gets bruised and needs a massaging. Uses his brother as his stand-in and supports Santorum. Etc., Etc. ...


14 posted on 02/10/2012 3:03:10 PM PST by j.argese (Newt ... the Nixon of our time ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

With respect to needing and winning independents ... it’s a bunch of hogwash.

SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT: CORRECTING MYTHS ABOUT INDEPENDENT VOTERS
http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/aia2011070702/

- the large majority of independents are independents in name only
- the large majority of self-identified independents are “closet partisans”
- independents with no party preference are 10% of the electorate & have a low rate of turnout
- in all three closely contested presidential elections since 1972, the candidate backed by most independent voters lost.

We don’t need independents. We need the conservative base. When we run moderates that the base opposes, we lose every time.


15 posted on 02/10/2012 3:12:45 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnk1N_OmawY


21 posted on 02/10/2012 3:34:29 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson