Skip to comments.
US data in Iranian hands after downed drone?
Fox News ^
| 2/10/2012
| Catherine Herridge
Posted on 02/13/2012 6:58:20 PM PST by U-238
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
1
posted on
02/13/2012 6:58:34 PM PST
by
U-238
To: Jet Jaguar; txhurl; nuconvert
2
posted on
02/13/2012 7:02:14 PM PST
by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: U-238
To: U-238
China will tell Iran everything they want them to know about it.
4
posted on
02/13/2012 7:09:20 PM PST
by
Mmogamer
(I refudiate the lamestream media, leftists and their prevaricutions.)
To: U-238
This is exactly why SF wanted to go in and destroy it.
Jug-ears the dumb-azz said no, the muzzies might be “offended.”
Can’t get him out fast enough...
.
5
posted on
02/13/2012 7:19:27 PM PST
by
TLI
( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
To: U-238
***...whether the malfunctions inadvertently may have handed the Iranians not only the aircraft but its data.***
Inadvertent? Not with this CIC...
6
posted on
02/13/2012 7:35:53 PM PST
by
MichaelCorleone
(Stop feeding the beast; spend money only with those who support traditional American values.)
To: U-238
tell us about the drone pilot
does he have a new Swiss bank account?
7
posted on
02/13/2012 7:44:20 PM PST
by
elpadre
(AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
I can guarantee you this. All of the data in and on the plane will end up in Russia,China or North Korea.What ever happen to an automatic self destruction when incidents like this happened?
8
posted on
02/13/2012 7:46:57 PM PST
by
U-238
To: elpadre
I think the drone pilot of the plane is all right.Its not his fault for flying a faulty plane. This is all of General Atomics fault and the CIA’s fault for not providing secure data links.
9
posted on
02/13/2012 7:51:18 PM PST
by
U-238
To: U-238
Quite frankly, none of this makes any GD sense.
There are limited scenarios that could possibly occur. One has to be what happened.
And no, super spy drones are not designed without failsafes—that is elementary.
And they are tested prior to use.
There is collusion here somehow. And I mean, up to the White House.
There is no reasonable explanation for this foul-up, which had multiple errors. None.
And none are acceptable.
10
posted on
02/13/2012 7:55:56 PM PST
by
exit82
(Democrats are the enemies of freedom. We have ideas-the Dems only have ideology.)
To: exit82
Its clear the plane did not have any failsafes because they General Atomics thought that the Iranians would not “spoof” the plane.That plane should of had a self destruct mechanism or switch the second the plane went out of control.
11
posted on
02/13/2012 8:01:07 PM PST
by
U-238
To: U-238
“I think the drone pilot of the plane is all right.Its not his fault for flying a faulty plane. “
I heard that Obama ordered a rescue mission be put together to get the pilot back.
12
posted on
02/13/2012 8:04:11 PM PST
by
HereInTheHeartland
(I love how the FR spellchecker doesn't recognize the word "Obama")
I would like to suggest to the CIA or Air Force to consider adding a self destruct mechanisms on all of their drone spy airplanes.
13
posted on
02/13/2012 8:04:42 PM PST
by
U-238
To: HereInTheHeartland
In fact Obama did send a special operations team to get the plane but they were too late.
14
posted on
02/13/2012 8:06:48 PM PST
by
U-238
To: U-238
That makes no sense. This is not directed to you personally.
Of course it had failsafes. That is standard operating procedure.
For this to even happen, there had to massive, multiple failures by multiple personnel.
Or it was ordered to happen.
With the regime, the latter makes the most sense.
The whole notion being put out by these sources that the drone had no failsafes is just disinformation...of the most insulting kind. We are not idiots.
15
posted on
02/13/2012 8:13:20 PM PST
by
exit82
(Democrats are the enemies of freedom. We have ideas-the Dems only have ideology.)
To: exit82
drone's operator to inadvertently land the aircraft.
There was nothing inadvertent about it. Someone paid a fee and on Obama's direction it was deliberately landed in enemy territory.
The Chinese then deposited the cash into the right accounts as payment in full.
And we all thought Clinton was good, Obama's Chicago training puts Obama far above even Clinton's tech transfers to China.
16
posted on
02/13/2012 8:56:41 PM PST
by
JSteff
((((It was ALL about SCOTUS. Most forget about that and HAVE DOOMED us for a generation or more.))))
To: exit82
Of course it had failsafes.
Yes but what if it was planned and the drone was set to land there?
Didn't it strike anyone how cavalierly it was handled?
It was NO accident that hardware or software could have prevented.
17
posted on
02/13/2012 9:20:56 PM PST
by
JSteff
((((It was ALL about SCOTUS. Most forget about that and HAVE DOOMED us for a generation or more.))))
To: exit82
Of course it had failsafes.
Yes but what if it was planned and the drone was set to land there?
Didn't it strike anyone how cavalierly it was handled?
It was NO accident that hardware or software could have prevented.
18
posted on
02/13/2012 9:22:45 PM PST
by
JSteff
((((It was ALL about SCOTUS. Most forget about that and HAVE DOOMED us for a generation or more.))))
To: U-238
It wouldn’t surprise me one bit if this drone just happened to have a USB drive on board that contained all of our most top secret weapons data.
19
posted on
02/13/2012 9:36:23 PM PST
by
Domandred
(Fdisk, format, and reinstall the entire .gov system.)
To: Domandred
those who know aren’t sayin and those who are sayin don’t know.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson