Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Bump THAT!! Did you read the Red State article listing Santorum’s big-government votes? If Santorum had run in 2010 instead of 2006, the tea party would have primaried him. He’s no fiscal conservative. He doesn’t understand the concept of individual liberty. He’s totally fine with legislating his values upon everyone else. (Yes, I am a Christian. Yes, I am a social conservative.)


77 posted on 02/14/2012 3:28:57 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan

“Bump THAT!! Did you read the Red State article listing Santorum’s big-government votes? If Santorum had run in 2010 instead of 2006, the tea party would have primaried him. He’s no fiscal conservative. He doesn’t understand the concept of individual liberty. He’s totally fine with legislating his values upon everyone else. (Yes, I am a Christian. Yes, I am a social conservative.)”

The difference is that Santorum is also defending fiscal conservative values while Romney is proud of his Romneycare and Newt likes to talk about his Moondoggle and how it is ‘inhumane’ to be for capitalism and controlling the border. Santorum was the one who went after Romneycare while Newt was trying to win over the Occupy vote.


80 posted on 02/14/2012 4:40:11 PM PST by ari-freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson