Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Next to word 'Divisive' in the dictionary is a picture of Axelrod
1 posted on 02/15/2012 8:04:17 AM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: Nachum

Another pearl of wisdom from Axelnimrod.


25 posted on 02/15/2012 8:21:23 AM PST by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Axelrod: Santorum’s stance on social issues ‘are quite divisive’

Normal versus Perverse “divisive”? Brilliant analysis.


26 posted on 02/15/2012 8:24:27 AM PST by Common Sense 101 (Hey libs... If your theories fly in the face of reality, it's not reality that's wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

There are 3 people that whenever I see them on TV, I change the channel. They are Axelrod, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and Obama.


28 posted on 02/15/2012 8:25:26 AM PST by Old Retired Army Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
The "divide" that Santorum is pointing out is a simple one, and a necessary one.

It is the difference between right and wrong, good and bad, healthy and unhealthy, success and failutre.

The fact is that the great social restructuring the democratic party has foisted for decades on these United States, costing tens of trillions of dollars, is money thrown down a rat hole.

It has done more to divide America, to entrap people in unhealthy social life styles, unhealthy economic conditions, and in failed policies than anything else in this nation's history.

Rick Santorum is simply pointing this out and naming names and they types of life-styles, economics, etc. that produce such misery.

Rick Santorum is pointing towards the traditional, underlying, moral foundation of the nation that has enspired and produced the most prosperous, giving, cahritable, and successful nation on earth and the path back to it.

He is pointing America towards the path of hope.

Of course Axelrod and Obama and all of their ilk are against it. They are totally invested in the policies of failure because it makes the sad creatures trapped in them beholden to, and dependent on them. It is their entire power base.

If that is devisive, so be it. We must go through that divide to get to the properity, success, and hope that lies beyond it...to pull proplr out of the embrace of death the left has clutched them in.

God grant that we can succeeed and pull our nation away from the embrace of these marxists and enemies.

30 posted on 02/15/2012 8:29:03 AM PST by Jeff Head (Liberty is not free. Never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Santorum is not electable, but it’s not because of this.

Obama would blow him away by at least 10-12 points and we’d lose Congress.

Rick is a terribly flawed candidate. We need someone else.


35 posted on 02/15/2012 8:34:03 AM PST by LowTaxesEqualsProsperity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

There is often a divide between right and wrong.


37 posted on 02/15/2012 8:36:44 AM PST by tnlibertarian (Selfishly stealing other people's witticisms for taglines since 2002.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

LOL!

My dear A$$elrod, your Puppet Bastard who loves to spend other peoples money has lost.

He is going to run on Government Run Religion, Government Run Healthcare, and Government Run Economy.

Your Puppet Bastard has run up such a large deficit (your Democrat Senate has not passed a budget in over 1,000 days) that the United States of America has be down graded.

You must be so proud.

You and Your Puppet Bastard are jokes.


39 posted on 02/15/2012 8:47:43 AM PST by Chgogal (WSJ, Kristol, Krauthammer, Rove et al., STFU. Thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

FU Axelnuts!...


40 posted on 02/15/2012 8:48:37 AM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Divisive.

Yes, dividing moral clarity from depravity.

For people who have no moral compass, like you, Axelgrease, anybody with a higher moral standard than you is “divisive”.


41 posted on 02/15/2012 8:49:38 AM PST by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum; b9; Marguerite; caww; Gator113; Lady Lucky; SatinDoll; TitansAFC; Red Steel
Wonder how a true social conservative could support a pro choice, pro Obamacare liberal like Arlen Spector Detest Axelrod and everything he stands for..however, I do have concerns regarding Santorum's support for Sonia Sotomyer,Romney and Arlen..all for socialized medicine and not exactly pro LIFE!
42 posted on 02/15/2012 8:53:19 AM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
Everyone seems to be concentrating on the “pro life” vs “pro abortion” debate; but, that's not what Axelrod and the Dems are going to make the issue. I'm afraid the enemy is not that dumb, folks. They are pivoting the issue to; “The Republicans will outlaw contraception!” Limbaugh spent most of his show on this yesterday and knows it means big trouble for Rick.

Rick is on record for making statements that imply contraception is both wrong and immoral. Statistically a very large number of U.S. women either use or have used contraceptives; some studies say as high as 99%. Rick's stance will be a VERY high hurdle to overcome.

Rick Santorum in his own words on contraception:

One of the things I will talk about, that no president has talked about before, is I think the dangers of contraception in this country,” the former Pennsylvania senator explained. “ It’s not okay. It’s a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be”

Source- see linked video at approx 17:48 minutes:

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2011/10/19/348007/rick-santorum-pledges-to-defund-contraception-its-not-okay-its-a-license-to-do-things/?mobile=nc

43 posted on 02/15/2012 9:00:27 AM PST by Ozymandias Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Santorum is not electable, but it’s not because of this.

Obama would blow him away by at least 10-12 points and we’d lose Congress.

On top of being a Big Government faux conservative who helped bankrupt our country, Rick is a terribly flawed candidate. We need someone else, perhaps someone not currently in the race.


44 posted on 02/15/2012 9:05:54 AM PST by LowTaxesEqualsProsperity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Divisive is a better thing to be than corrosive. To divide virtue from vice is what Mr. Axelrod would call divisive. To call evil good is what he would label virtuous.

David Axelrod will one day die alone and unmourned, his only accomplishments having been to promote to high office those who have helped destroy individual responsibility for the sake not of freedom but of license. His reward will have been money. Money can buy medical personnel to help extend by a little a life lived for self and then a grave aggrandizing self.

The man is an exceedingly clever fool.


45 posted on 02/15/2012 9:08:24 AM PST by Belteshazzar (We are not justified by our works but by faith - De Jacob et vita beata 2 +Ambrose of Milan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Yep. Santorum’s stance is very divisive. And he’s on the right side of the divide. It’s wheat from chaff time.


47 posted on 02/15/2012 9:21:26 AM PST by Reo (the 4th Estate is a 5th Column)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

The ABC party of Abortion, Buggery and Conception is self-liquidating. Obama’s election possibilities will die from social disease rather than the economy.


56 posted on 02/15/2012 10:08:57 AM PST by ex-snook ("above all things, truth beareth away the victory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

You’re right - Axelrod’s divisive. Pot wishing the kettle was black...


57 posted on 02/15/2012 10:11:53 AM PST by GOPJ (GAS WAS $1.85 per gallon on the day Obama was Inaugurated! - - freeper Gaffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; DoughtyOne; calcowgirl; Gilbo_3; Impy; Pan_Yans Wife; ...
So far the only thing I have seen Dems show that they could use effectively against RS is that video from the past year where he stated his personal moral objections to contraceptives and said as POTUS he would preach about the evils of it. I havent seen anything else very useful to them.

That is the one Dems would use to try to get women voters to vote Obama. I have already seen some of this, any positions he takes that relate to abortion or BC will be used in ads telling women that he wants to ‘take away your BC’. And the lib media women whiners will repeat over and over :"I don't believe we are having this debate in this day and age" (have already seen that too.)

So he better be prepared if he gets it.

OH_OH, concern troll alert! LOL

62 posted on 02/15/2012 10:53:34 AM PST by sickoflibs (You MUST support the lesser of two RINOs or we all die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

It is remarkable the the Republicans know EXACTLY what the Left is going to do, in fact anybody with an IQ above the level of a salamander knows, and yet when they do it, they act surprised and are unprepared.

For 19th Amendment voters, the word “divisive” is like the cross to Dracula. It’s unfortunate, but a fact nonetheless.

Not only do the Republicans NOT call the most divisive administration in history “divisive”, but when the label is applied to them, they act guilty, or apologize.


70 posted on 02/16/2012 5:00:38 AM PST by Jim Noble ("The Germans: At your feet, or at your throat" - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson