Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Democrat_media

“Palin would be so far ahead now.”
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

I respectfully disagree, women are the majority of registered voters and women decide in the end who is president, either by their vote or the withholding of their vote. The majority of women (the majority of the majority voting segment) tend to vote for “liberals”. In 2008 women chose a totally unqualified, unvetted “man” and I use the parentheses because I consider him a poor excuse for a man, over Hillary Clinton, a liberal democrat woman.

What all that boils down to is this, women WILL decide this primary and the general election, if they did not want a liberal democrat woman why does anyone think they want a conservative Republican woman? I think Sarah Palin is smart enough to see all this and that is why she is not running.


109 posted on 02/16/2012 5:15:53 AM PST by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: RipSawyer

Excellent point, Rip.


112 posted on 02/16/2012 8:42:46 AM PST by CainConservative (Santorum/Huck 2012 w/ Newt, Cain, Palin, Bach, Parker, Watts, Duncan, & Petraeus in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

To: RipSawyer; All

Excellent point, Rip.


113 posted on 02/16/2012 8:43:03 AM PST by CainConservative (Santorum/Huck 2012 w/ Newt, Cain, Palin, Bach, Parker, Watts, Duncan, & Petraeus in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson