Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Santorum's provocative language could be obstacle
Reuters ^ | Feb 15th, 2012 | Ros Krasny

Posted on 02/15/2012 6:55:30 PM PST by Mariner

BOSTON (Reuters) - Republican candidate Rick Santorum has won support from American conservatives for his views on social issues but a habit of hyperbole may lead to stumbles in his White House bid.

In Boise, Idaho, on Tuesday, Santorum compared contraception to deodorant and soap when making a point about why he believes birth control should not be covered by health insurers.

"Let's mandate that every insurance policy covers toothpaste. Deodorant. That might be a good idea, right? Have everyone cover deodorant, right? Soap. I mean, where do you stop?"

Santorum also fell back on a well-worn Republican criticism that President Barack Obama and his administration are elitists.

"Don't you see how they see you? How they look down their nose at the average Americans? These elite snobs," said Santorum, who reported 2010 income of almost $1 million, according to financial disclosure forms.

Though he is giving Republican rival Mitt Romney a run for his money in the nomination race, Santorum's language might be an obstacle if he wins his party's nomination to challenge Obama in the November 6 election.

"As a frontrunner you have to watch exactly what you say," said Donna Robinson Devine, professor of government at Smith College in Northampton, Massachusetts. "The attention has moved to Santorum, but to me he seems very whiny. I just can't imagine him as president."

Santorum's most famous equivalence came from 2003.

In an interview, he said that if the Supreme Court protected the right for gays to have consensual sex in their own homes, "then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything."

Comments in that interview that homosexuality was not as bad as bestiality...

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: biggovernmentrick; idiot; kstreet; kstreetproject; lobbyistrick; santorum; taxreturn; whiner; whining; whiny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-119 next last
To: Mariner
Here's the quote I referenced:

"As a frontrunner you have to watch exactly what you say," said Donna Robinson Devine, professor of government at Smith College in Northampton, Massachusetts. "The attention has moved to Santorum, but to me he seems very whiny. I just can't imagine him as president."

Are you, or are you not, 100% in agreement with Donna Robinson Devine, professor of government at Smith College?

21 posted on 02/15/2012 7:22:12 PM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Santorum’s point is spot on. Why do we make special circumstances for one product? If the government can mandate that employers provide birth control, then they can mandate anything else as well. Should they mandate that your employer provides you lunch? A car? A house? I don't think this is too difficult to grasp or provocative language at all. But you know the Santorum bashers will run with it.
22 posted on 02/15/2012 7:23:26 PM PST by bushinohio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

I agree 100%


23 posted on 02/15/2012 7:23:53 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Well I can honestly say that I’m not helping Romney. You?


24 posted on 02/15/2012 7:23:56 PM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: Joe 6-pack
"Are you, or are you not, 100% in agreement with Donna Robinson Devine, professor of government at Smith College?"

No, not at ALL in agreement with the silly professor.

Again, your zeal has made you blind to what people actually say (type).

26 posted on 02/15/2012 7:30:20 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: bushinohio

If we can outlaw smoking in bars, why not in private cars or homes?


27 posted on 02/15/2012 7:30:32 PM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

I am sick and tired of the govt interfering in social issues. IMO it is up to the parents to teach morals.

My main concern is the economy. Prefer a strong fiscal conservative that would never allow a project such as the Keystone pipeline to be slashed; do prefer Newt’s proposal on Soc Sec over Santorum’s and like the idea of the Galveston plan; would like the govt to lift so many barriers environmentally, tax wise, WAGES ( entry level workers such as teenagers, some supplemnting incomes should be allowed to work for less than a govt imposed min wage..I did when I was 16) cut aid to foreign nations and the UN..get out imo; also, I did like what Newt said during his cpac speech on tracking illegals..he compared it to going online and tracking packages via ups or fed ex and millions and millions and millions are tracked every week..so why couldnt we privatize this to a credit card company? heck they would track you down in the Amazon jungle.

Let the parents and families get back to the morals and the govt get the hell out of our personal lives and stop spending our nation into oblivion


28 posted on 02/15/2012 7:31:58 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: independent in tx

You mean people won’t like it when they find out that conservatives want to protect marriage and fight the homosexual agenda of the far left?


29 posted on 02/15/2012 7:33:06 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Stupid article unless you want Romney. Mr perfect is t running.

Santorum is well spoken. Every member of congress makes
Good
Money when they get out. Deal with it.


30 posted on 02/15/2012 7:33:49 PM PST by Yaelle (Go Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
"Well I can honestly say that I’m not helping Romney. You?"

No.

And Romney has the same problem as Santorum...even worse. He's a Bishop in the Mormon Church and the MSM will make him defend that to the exclusion of darn near everything else except Bain, Swiss Bank Accounts etc.

31 posted on 02/15/2012 7:33:55 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Yeah. Let’s play it SAFE this time and go with a solid moderate, like a John McCain. Yeah, that’ll do the trick. One moderate vs. one flaming socialist. A real choice for the American people. That’s the ticket. / sarc


32 posted on 02/15/2012 7:34:39 PM PST by AmericanInTokyo (Santorum is worth a good second look, my friends. Why is it the media and White House hate him so?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Exactly. Most people have lost the concept of what insurance is. It is meant to cover infrequent, expensives risks like a house fire or major accident. Therefore a large number of policyholders pay a small premium to share the costs of those few policyholders who have a claim incident.

If I pay a premium to cover a cost I know I am going to have like cleaning my teeth then I am paying somebody a fee to pay those costs for me. That is not insurance.

The problem with mandating routine costs like contraception is that you are forcing policyholders who do not need contraception to subsidize those who do via premiums paid. This is economically immoral. And that ignores that some policyholders may object to contraception for religious reasons.


33 posted on 02/15/2012 7:34:51 PM PST by Truth is a Weapon (Truth, it hurts so good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Stupid article unless you want Romney. Mr perfect is t running.

Santorum is well spoken. Every member of congress makes
Good
Money when they get out. Deal with it.


34 posted on 02/15/2012 7:35:55 PM PST by Yaelle (Go Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
"No, not at ALL in agreement with the silly professor."

So then, you can imagine Santorum as president...I'm just trying to square that with your remark, "If we nominate this guy we're toast."

35 posted on 02/15/2012 7:37:36 PM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

and that is another thing...this is bipartisan..why should they get big bucks for life even if they only serve one term. Talk about ripping the taxpayers off! it is outrageous that their retirement is so massive ..and I mean all of them


36 posted on 02/15/2012 7:38:17 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

oh please.

I guess leftists are never provocative?

They call us demons, women haters, nazi’s and everything else.


37 posted on 02/15/2012 7:42:07 PM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
"So then, you can imagine Santorum as president."

Absolutely. I think he'd make a good President.

But unlike you I don't think he's electable. Of course he hasn't won the nod yet and everything is conjecture at this point.

And, I'll be surprised if he can win enough delegates for the nomination.

38 posted on 02/15/2012 7:43:20 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

You were helping Romney when you were smearing Newt all over the place. Is it just Santorum that we are not supposed to vet?


39 posted on 02/15/2012 7:44:52 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
If he makes it to September you'll see endless, full broadsides.

And that would be different with another candidate? Where you have been last several election cycles? In 2004 one news organization even peddled forged documents to trash Bush. McCain was trashed. Dole was trashed. Bush I was trashed.

Who, in your judgment, should we nominate that Obama and the media would not attack with "endless, full broadsides"?

40 posted on 02/15/2012 7:45:10 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-119 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson