Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kralcmot

See below. No my answer says that I would lvote Romney before I would vote Paul. But, Romney does not seemed to be allowed as an answer on this forum. THe choice given was a false one, i.e. you can’t vote for Romney, so you must vote for Paul.

I say you can vote for nobody, or you can vote for Romney. Paul is NOT a choice. Neither is Obama.


64 posted on 02/17/2012 7:01:50 AM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: afraidfortherepublic
"No my answer says that I would lvote Romney before I would vote Paul. But, Romney does not seemed to be allowed as an answer on this forum. THe choice given was a false one, i.e. you can’t vote for Romney, so you must vote for Paul. I say you can vote for nobody, or you can vote for Romney. Paul is NOT a choice. Neither is Obama."

Speaking as a Virginian, I disagree. My primary will offer me the choice of Romney or Paul, period---no write-ins allowed. I can't stand Ron Paul; I think he's an anti-Semitic, Muslim-loving, naive idiot. But the lunatic has no chance of being the nominee. If I don't vote for him---or more accurately, against Romney---then Willard MIGHT be the nominee. As a Christian whose loyalty is to God first, I MUST do my part to deny VA'S delegates to that abortion-loving, sodomite-pandering, loathsome, corrupt, malicious cult member.

68 posted on 02/17/2012 7:48:56 AM PST by CatherineofAragon (I can haz Romney's defeat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson