Posted on 02/18/2012 7:27:44 AM PST by no dems
Santorum is against abortion, against women in combat, against Govt forcing churches to pay for things they find against their creed.
whats not to like?
He has publicly stated ad nauseum that his and his wifes views on contraception are private and not about govt mandates
So why so canard?
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
I was supporting Rick Santorum. (See my tagline please.) I agree with many of his views. I would NEVER vote for someone who is Pro-Choice on Abortion and same-sex marriage; never. But he needs to learn how to answer a question with a little more diplomacy if he wants to be elected President of these United States. (You, apparently, missed the entire point of my vanity post.) Right now, he’d be lucky to get 35 percent of the women’s vote. That might explain how he, as a sitting incumbent, lost his Senate seat by 18 points to the brain-dead Bob Casey. And, to insinuate that women in combat would end up with male and female soldiers having sex on the battlefield...... come on; give me a friggin’ break. Santorum dude is just out of touch with the real world. (And probably very sexually frustrated and horny.) Personally, I like having sex, just for sex, with my wife. So do a lot of other men. Rick seems to think the main reason for sex is procreation. And.............
...........how did you like his comment today about Obama’s “phony theology”? While I agree, there are some things, as a candidate for President, you just don’t say. It makes him look like a “not-very-serious” competitor for Obozo. When you do answer, do so with tact. He just blurts out the first thing that comes to his pointed head. I say again: Mr. Santorum needs a little elucidation before publication.
You’ve made me tired. Have a good day.
Sen. Santorum is not out of touch with the “real world” as you put it. I think he is exactly in touch with the real world which is one of the reasons he believes what he believes. I’m a woman and nothing he has said has offended me.
Personally, I think that men who claim to know who women will support are offensive.
PULEEEEEEZE!!!
.......attacking something Santorum said in an interview that had nothing to do with pending legislation?
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
You’re kidding; right? Things people say in interviews, especially in the Primary season, makes great sound bites for the opposing team to use against them in the GE. HELLO...........
Six months ago it was generally agreed that adultery was wrong. Now its celebrated.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Celebrated by whom? Are you in reference to Newt supporters?
I think that men who claim to know who women will support are offensive
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
I think women who get offended because a man states a view that is backed up by demographics and Election Statistics are ignorant.
You want to try that again? With due respect, that is one of the most ridiculous conclusions I’ve ever seen on FR - or any where - for that matter.
I agree with you, that cheerleading for adultery comment was just stupid.
Is that you, Sheriff Babeu?
You chose the wrong profession. Become a campaign advisor. ;-)
Yep, you are right! So many women have been in combat with their own offspring, engaging in chemical/biological warfare against America's future: I.E. future Americans for years and years and years now. It's a testament to God's long-suffering mercy that we are not a smoking crater already.
We used to say, "women and children first" but there is no point in saying that on this Titanic II since the children have been killed off and women are more fit than the men to go down with the ship!
Are you kidding? There is going to be a lot more welfare. They don't want our pittance. They are way past that weak strategy. They want to make sure that we never have any more than a pittance.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.