Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Pill Is Not Good for Women
National Review Online ^ | February 21, 2012 | Erika Bachiochi & Catherine R. Pakaluk

Posted on 02/23/2012 8:27:49 PM PST by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 02/23/2012 8:27:53 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem; lilycicero; MaryLou1; glock rocks; JPG; VinceASA; Monkey Face; RIghtwardHo; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.


2 posted on 02/23/2012 8:31:05 PM PST by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

My sister,who is 17,takes them because her periods wee very painful,so they can be beneficial.

I might take them for the same reason,as my periods are heavy and are affecting my iron levels.


3 posted on 02/23/2012 8:31:13 PM PST by POWERSBOOTHEFAN (Future Meteorologist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: POWERSBOOTHEFAN

That’s ‘were’,not ‘wee’.


4 posted on 02/23/2012 8:32:11 PM PST by POWERSBOOTHEFAN (Future Meteorologist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

IIRC, though, there are other medical applications for the Pill— I know it’s been used to treat severe gastronomical disorders, for example.


5 posted on 02/23/2012 8:34:22 PM PST by sthguard (The DNC theme song: "All You Need is Guv")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: narses

Hillarious and demonstrative of the problem we have with Gov!

6 posted on 02/23/2012 8:35:11 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mylife

:)


7 posted on 02/23/2012 8:37:51 PM PST by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Bottom line is what is preventing a doctor from writing a prescription and the patient going to the pharmacy and paying a copay for the drug?


8 posted on 02/23/2012 8:46:44 PM PST by Bronzy (Send a NEWTron to Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

This is discriminatory to those of were born of the wrong gender, who need to ingest hormones to develop traits of the opposite gender. WHY CAN’T I HAVE FREE HORMONES???? It’s wasis! /sarc


9 posted on 02/23/2012 8:56:38 PM PST by Klemper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: POWERSBOOTHEFAN

While those uses could be considered ethical even by the Catholic Standard of double effect. You might want to investigate the concept of naprotechnology and health care providers that might be able to provide treatment options that could be far less toxic than the pill.

The website is easy to find http://naprotechnology.com/


10 posted on 02/23/2012 8:57:59 PM PST by rwilson99 (Please tell me how the words "shall not perish and have everlasting life" would NOT apply to Mary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bronzy

Nothing... since at least 98% of the population uses already.


11 posted on 02/23/2012 8:59:03 PM PST by rwilson99 (Please tell me how the words "shall not perish and have everlasting life" would NOT apply to Mary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rwilson99

/forgotten sarcasm tag.


12 posted on 02/23/2012 8:59:26 PM PST by rwilson99 (Please tell me how the words "shall not perish and have everlasting life" would NOT apply to Mary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The high rate of unmarried pregnancy is not a result of the pill. It is a result of not using the pill and a government support system, welfare for unwed mothers, health care etc. that is provided by the government i.e. the taxpayer. If you subsidize a particular lifestyle your will have more of that lifestyle.

Morally I have absolutely no problem with the use of the pill. I have a hell of a problem with abortions of convenience. I also have a big problem with government deciding what a religious institution (the Catholic Church and their hospitals) must provide in the way of contreception and abortion for their employees.

This administration is the one that has crossed the boundary between church and state. That worked out real good for Henry the VIII in England. They are still fighting that battle today in Northern Ireland.

13 posted on 02/23/2012 9:05:36 PM PST by cpdiii (Deckhand, Roughneck, Mud Man, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist. THE CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii
Morally I have absolutely no problem with the use of the pill. I have a hell of a problem with abortions of convenience.

Even the abortions that are caused by the pill? If not you contradict yourself.

14 posted on 02/23/2012 9:11:54 PM PST by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

They keep learning strange new things about The Pill.
Messing with the hormones over a long period of time can’t be a good thing.

Here is one article about how it changes the chemistry of attraction....
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/pill-makes-women-less-responsive-720132.html

And the funny thing is....while women are being sold on the idea they need the pill in order to enjoy sex. The opposite is most likely true...that women who are not on the pill are the ones enjoying it the most.


15 posted on 02/23/2012 9:22:19 PM PST by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwilson99

I probably should not take the Pill anyway because of my age. I’m 35 and I believe that’s the “cut-off” age.


16 posted on 02/23/2012 9:40:35 PM PST by POWERSBOOTHEFAN (Future Meteorologist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: POWERSBOOTHEFAN

I would actually be most concerned about your sister. The World Health Organization has identified the Pill as a Carcinogen and the younger someone starts, the higher the risk for breast cancer.

http://www.prlog.org/10922665-birth-control-pill-shown-to-be-carcinogen.html

She should know her options.


17 posted on 02/23/2012 9:45:15 PM PST by rwilson99 (Please tell me how the words "shall not perish and have everlasting life" would NOT apply to Mary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: POWERSBOOTHEFAN
Doesn't matter to most women, they still use it.

I find it hard to believe that a person could take high doses of a chemical hormone for decades and not have a serious increase in health problems.

18 posted on 02/23/2012 9:53:28 PM PST by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: POWERSBOOTHEFAN
My sister,who is 17,takes them because her periods wee very painful,so they can be beneficial.

The pill is a class-1 carcinogen. One should always do a cost-benefit analysis before beginning any course of medical treatment. Are less painful periods worth the increased risk of breast cancer in your 50s?
19 posted on 02/23/2012 9:58:40 PM PST by Antoninus (Mitt Romney -- attempting to execute a hostile take-over of the Republican Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rwilson99

I’ll mention it to my mother because my sister will flip out and ask “Am I going to die”?

That is the last thing we need.


20 posted on 02/23/2012 10:06:20 PM PST by POWERSBOOTHEFAN (Future Meteorologist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson