Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Catholic Bishop's Prez: Our Rights Don’t Depend on Obama
Life News ^ | February 23, 2012 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 02/24/2012 5:58:44 AM PST by NYer

USCCB President Timothy Cardinal Dolan has issued a new letter to his fellow Catholic bishops that is one of the strongest condemnations yet of the revised Obama mandate that pro-life advocates have blasted for trampling on religious freedoms.

In the new letter issued Wednesday and co-signed by Bishop William Lori, Dolan condemns the mandate and urges support for the Respect for Rights of Conscience Act, which would overturn the revision of the original mandate that forced religious employers to pay for birth control and drugs that cause abortions. The new mandate puts the onus for paying for them on insurance companies but religious employers may still have to pay and will be required to make referrals for their employees.

Dolan obliterates the mandate, saying religious rights and freedoms are a God-given right that and it “does not depend on any government’s decision to grant it.”

“If the government can, for example, tell Catholics that they cannot be in the insurance business today without violating their religious convictions, where does it end?” Dolan asks.

“The regulations would provide no protections for our great institutions—such as Catholic charities, hospitals, and universities—or for the individual faithful in the marketplace. The regulations struck at the heart of our fundamental right to religious liberty, which affects our ability to serve those outside our faith community,” Dolan says. “On Friday, February 10, the Administration issued the final rules. By their very terms, the rules were reaffirmed “without change.” The mandate to provide the illicit services remains. The exceedingly narrow exemption for churches remains. Despite the outcry, all the threats to religious liberty posed by the initial rules remain.”

Dolan calls on pro-life advocates and Catholics to support the Blunt Amendment, which will come up soon in the Senate.

“We all need to act now by contacting our legislators in support of the Respect for Rights of Conscience Act,” he says.

Tell Obama: Stop This Pro-Abortion Mandate

The full text of the letter appears below:

Dear Brother Bishops,

Since we last wrote to you concerning the critical efforts we are undertaking together to protect religious freedom in our beloved country, many of you have requested that we write once more to update you on the situation and to again request the assistance of all the faithful in this important work. We are happy to do so now.

First, we wish to express our heartfelt appreciation to you, and to all our sisters and brothers in Christ, for the remarkable witness of our unity in faith and strength of conviction during this past month. We have made our voices heard, and we will not cease from doing so until religious freedom is restored.

As we know, on January 20, the Department of Health and Human Services announced a decision to issue final regulations that would force practically all employers, including many religious institutions, to pay for abortion inducing drugs, sterilizations, and contraception. The regulations would provide no protections for our great institutions—such as Catholic charities, hospitals, and universities—or for the individual faithful in the marketplace. The regulations struck at the heart of our fundamental right to religious liberty, which affects our ability to serve those outside our faith community.

Since January 20, the reaction was immediate and sustained. We came together, joined by people of every creed and political persuasion, to make one thing resoundingly clear: we stand united against any attempt to deny or weaken the right to religious liberty upon which our country was founded.

On Friday, February 10, the Administration issued the final rules. By their very terms, the rules were reaffirmed “without change.” The mandate to provide the illicit services remains. The exceedingly narrow exemption for churches remains. Despite the outcry, all the threats to religious liberty posed by the initial rules remain.

Religious freedom is a fundamental right of all. This right does not depend on any government’s decision to grant it: it is God-given, and just societies recognize and respect its free exercise. The free exercise of religion extends well beyond the freedom of worship. It also forbids government from forcing people or groups to violate their most deeply held religious convictions, and from interfering in the internal affairs of religious organizations.

Recent actions by the Administration have attempted to reduce this free exercise to a “privilege” arbitrarily granted by the government as a mere exemption from an all-encompassing, extreme form of secularism. The exemption is too narrowly defined, because it does not exempt most non-profit religious employers, the religiously affiliated insurer, the self-insured employer, the for-profit religious employer, or other private businesses owned and operated by people who rightly object to paying for abortion inducing drugs, sterilization, and contraception. And because it is instituted only by executive whim, even this unduly narrow exemption can be taken away easily.

In the United States, religious liberty does not depend on the benevolence of who is regulating us. It is our “first freedom” and respect for it must be broad and inclusive—not narrow and exclusive. Catholics and other people of faith and good will are not second class citizens. And it is not for the government to decide which of our ministries is “religious enough” to warrant religious freedom protection.

This is not just about contraception, abortion-causing drugs, and sterilization—although all should recognize the injustices involved in making them part of a universal mandated health care program. It is not about Republicans or Democrats, conservatives or liberals. It is about people of faith. This is first and foremost a matter of religious liberty for all. If the government can, for example, tell Catholics that they cannot be in the insurance business today without violating their religious convictions, where does it end? This violates the constitutional limits on our government, and the basic rights upon which our country was founded.

Much remains to be done. We cannot rest when faced with so grave a threat to the religious liberty for which our parents and grandparents fought. In this moment in history we must work diligently to preserve religious liberty and to remove all threats to the practice of our faith in the public square. This is our heritage as Americans. President Obama should rescind the mandate, or at the very least, provide full and effective measures to protect religious liberty and conscience.

Above all, dear brothers, we rely on the help of the Lord in this important struggle. We all need to act now by contacting our legislators in support of the Respect for Rights of Conscience Act, which can be done through our action alert on www.usccb.org/conscience.

We invite you to share the contents of this letter with the faithful of your diocese in whatever form, or by whatever means, you consider most suitable. Let us continue to pray for a quick and complete resolution to this and all threats to religious liberty and the exercise of our faith in our great country.

Timothy Cardinal Dolan
Archbishop of New York
President, United States Conference of Catholic Bishops

Most Reverend William E. Lori
Bishop of Bridgeport
Chairman, Ad Hoc Committee for Religious Liberty


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: hhs; obama; patsy; usccb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: SumProVita
Care to substantiate that?

not without a bill of sale, I can't. However, reasoning a posteriori, his zeal for socialized medicine, his utter silence until now, not to mention his card-carrying boilerplate Democrat-Catholicism, provide substantial evidence. This man is a textbook Obamatholic. At least he was until his soundbytes started carrying outside the Archdiocese of New York.

Furthermore, it's enough for me to know a politician when I see one.

So substantiate that.

21 posted on 02/24/2012 3:51:51 PM PST by the invisib1e hand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

- his zeal for socialized medicine,
- his utter silence until now,
- his card-carrying boilerplate Democrat-Catholicism,
- a textbook Obamatholic
- a politician

___________________________________________________

Please give adequate evidence for all of the above.


22 posted on 02/24/2012 4:22:37 PM PST by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

oh don’t be such a fvcking dweeb. prove it wrong.


23 posted on 02/24/2012 4:25:34 PM PST by the invisib1e hand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

Ad hominem (you have nothing else).


24 posted on 02/24/2012 4:27:25 PM PST by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita
ad hominem

Gawd that's lame. youre devastating with that Latin, arent you? But your arguing faculty isn't worth the electrons it takes to make that tagline you cut and pasted there to show us you're a serious catholic.

Furthermore, you make yourself an example of your own point by dodging the challenge like a bully.

And just because I still get really pissed off at ankle-biting idiots, I'll respond the last time:

You do your own homework, junior. You go search the Cardinal's blog for his pronouncements on Obamacare before it was law. And for his remarks about being staunchly pro-union. And for his admonitions to people in this City who opposed the Ground Zero mosque. And if you're at all capable of abstraction, contemplate why this Prince of The Church's public oratory was, prior to his appointment to Cardinal, devoid of any meaningful criticisms of Obama, obamacare, or the sham political process -- in blatant violation of the laws of this land -- that mocked even reading that Goddamned bill before it was passed. Classic Kennedy Catholicism.You do your own homework, you idolworshipping sycophant. This archdiocese is my home for nearly ten years. And people I know who have been here all their lives have, like me, seen them come and go.

And how fvcking dare you call into question my motives or my allegiance to my Holy Mother Church because I don't worship "rockstar" princes and other paper tigers.

Now piss off once and for all.

25 posted on 02/25/2012 5:58:24 AM PST by the invisib1e hand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

You made the claims and then did not substantiate them. It would also seem that you don’t have much control of your emotions.


26 posted on 02/25/2012 6:08:59 AM PST by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson