Maybe you should go back to using your far left santorumexposed site. People know that Anne is in the tank for Mitt-ercup.
The real problem is the Voters.
Isn’t Ms. Coulter in the tank for Romney? If so, her opinions of other candidates are suspect.
This from the lady who says Mitt Romney is a Conservative. Bwahahahahahahahahahaha, snort, snort, snicker, snicker, hehehehehehehehehehehehe. Ann you are just to funny and not only have you jumped the shark but the moon too.
Santorum cares about foreign policy etc. He didn’t say he only cares about family issues. She’s an entertainer.
That’s odd. I don’t recall you posting the Coulter articles where she bashed Newt. So are you on board with Ann now?
Check back with me after the election, Ann. Right now I’m just tuning you out.
“Even when I agree with Rick Santorum, listening to him argue the point almost makes me change my mind.”
How ironic . . .
Is that about right, or is there some other angle I'm missing?
As far as I'm concerned Ann has lost her credibility!
Romney 167
Santorum 87
Gingrich 32
Paul 19
Say what you want about Rick, he is the only one giving Mitt any competition while Newt and Paul fight over who is the biggest loser.
Santorum is an entertainer.
I’ve always liked Ann. Interesting to watch her derail this year.
There seems to be desperation in Ann’s writing these days. I think she knows that she has destroyed her career.
Then I would have known her column was posted and not wasted my time posting it.
I find myself agreeing with Santorum's positions but wishing he could express them more articulately.
His speech after the Michigan primary was good but did he have to say “the men and women who signed the Declaration of Independence.” No women signed it.
I liked how he used Rev Wright to shut up Charlie Rose but he could have delivered the line better and really destroyed him.
Santorum is sometimes very good in expressing his views but often I wish he would just make one coherent point.
Newt has a much better cadence and delivers his lines far more forcefully and convincingly.
But at least Santorum has never called himself a “severe conservative”.
Well, now, here’s the thing - I kind of LIKE Rick Santorum. He manages to be a real person, hanging out there warts and all, and not be consumed heart and soul playing politician all the day long. He has been snidely criticized BECAUSE of his pro-family attitudes, yet he does not waver. And his condemnation of the “Affordable Care And Patient Protection Act” helps to bring into sharp focus the many errors and omissions that were in the “Romneycare” legislation in Massachuetts.
SAntorum would work to REPEAL the “Obamacare” monstrosity, Romney would be content to “fix” it. Fixing up evil is still evil, and antithetical to the American way.
Still supporting the Santorum candidacy. But only because Herman Cain is not there.
The problem with Ann Coulter is she’s a Mitt-Bot.
This is where Annie girl is WRONG. She thinks that inalienable rights can be voted away by the states—a majority can take away “inalienable” rights from children—and it is “Just Law” because a majority voted for it. Nope.
Can’t even GIVE AWAY inalienable rights if you wanted to, Annie Girl. That means that “homosexual Marriage” and abortion ISN”T A STATES ISSUE—it is the inalienable rights of children issue and the issue of DUTY that all human beings are required to do in a Just State—which is Raise their own biological children. Any laws that prevent this “General Welfare” of children is UNJUST and EVIL—this promotion of evil sodomy and EVIL of killing—is not “Just Law” by the definition put into our Constitution by the Founders and John Marshall.
Justice John Marshall would have declared all these types of irrational laws as unjust law—and declared them “Null and Void”. It is the DUTY of all justices to align ALL LAWS to the Constitution—it’s intent and meaning which declares there is a Right and Wrong according to God’s Laws-—not arbitrary Barney Frank Marxist laws designed to destroy logic and the natural family.
Santorum understands the importance of control over who becomes judges on the Supreme Court among many OTHER crucial issues. Romney is another zero and will allow these gross unjust laws that go against Nature. He is for promotion of sodomy in the military which destroys the freedom of conscience in all Christians soldiers and removes the once Christian paradigm which is in line with our Constitution to the ideology of Marx which intentionally denies Natural Law—to destroy the family and Christianity so they can make slaves of all—addicts to the sins of the flesh are easy to bribe and manipulate and control. Romney if for unjust, evil laws which deny reason, logic and science and destroys freedom because you destroy Virtue when you promote Evil.
All the Founders knew that laws had to promote Virtue. This irrational destruction of morality in law was a deliberate Marxist (John Austin, Holmes, jr.) coup to destroy “Just Law” and therefore, the Constitution, which will devolve into tyranny (Cicero).
We need to return to the Rule of Law which allows only “Just Law”!!!!!