Posted on 03/03/2012 5:59:02 AM PST by Kaslin
It isn't just a fallacy; with them it's a political tool.
Gays are constantly trying to ambush conservatives by outing family members or close longtime associates -- they noticed that Barry Goldwater changed his views after he discovered that a family member was gay. They have ambushed Rep. Bob Dornan, the late Rev. Jerry Falwell (over whose sudden death, like Andrew Breitbart's, they gloated openly), Newt Gingrich and others in this way; and they entreated Mary Cheney to out herself publicly precisely in order to corner Dick Cheney and extort some sort of statement from him and wife Lynn that the GLPC/HRC/Homomiasma could use politically.
Who was that?
You should have told him what Lee Iacocca said one time when he was firing an enfant terrible engineering manager at Chrysler. A defender said the guy was an engineering genius, he was just terrible with people. Retorted Iacocca, "Well, that's too bad, because that's all we've got around here."
Absolutely you were allowed to push back. Liberals have become too accustomed to having their say and keeping some people quiet in their fundamental disagreements by calling them “racists” or “ill informed” etc. etc. They don’t tend to take it well when we meet their rhetoric with fact..or their rabid dogma with firm convictions based on these truths..” all men are created equal and endowed by their creator ( not government) with certain unalienable ( this means that no one..no one can take them from us) Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed”
Ah, so she's a master of the form in autobiography, is she? And doing multiple books on the same subject, like _resident Barky. Wonderful.
</s> (Not really necessary, was it?)
I laughed when she told me that. She didn’t take that well. O’well..:)
He was a science-fiction writer who wrote under the name of Philip H. High. As stories go they are very dated by today’s standards. But I really appreciate the way he saw society breaking down around him.
Amazon carries them in Kindle format. Invader on my Back and Butterfly planet are both good examples of the breakdown into these three factions.
"The principle feature of American liberalism is sanctimoniousness. By loudly denouncing all bad things -- war and hunger and date rape -- liberals testify to their own terrific goodness.More important, they promote themselves to membership in a self-selecting elite of those who care deeply about such things. It's a kind of natural aristocracy, and the wonderful thing about this aristocracy is that you don't have to be brave, smart, strong or even lucky to join it, you just have to be liberal.'
-- P. J. O'Rourke
Exactly.
by Charles Krauthammer
I have not read any of her books.
If I somehow came into possession (certainly not by purchase!) of one or more of them, I’d publicly burn them and hope that would incite a riot among her LIEberal womyn whacko FRiends!
PS After all, her LIEberal womyn whacko FRiends are about as insane as the Afghanistanis who rioted!
Thanks for your kind reply.
Perhaps I will give it a once-over and post it as its own thread.
FRegards,
LH
I wish that would happen to me.
Scratch the surface of any liberal, and you will find a fascist.
I think you will be pleased at the FReeper response to it.
You probably already know this being a teacher, but others don't. Policy Sci 101. The definition of politics is who gets what, when, and how. In other words. Politics is about power.
It's frankly time that conservatives and libertarians understand not just the what part, but the how part. It's not civil, except when civility is used as a tool.
No surprise there.
The Democrat party was the Party of Slavery™ at its founding 200 years ago; it remains the Party of Slavery™ today.
I once ran across an expression to the effect of “Liberals form their facts based on feelings; conservatives form their feelings based on facts.”
What a smarmy know-it-all smug smirk on her face. She dresses like a derelict. She has hair that is wild and out of control, kind of like her goofy brain, and its “form” defies any definition of style. I would be embarrassed to be seen with her anywhere in public.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.