Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Daugaard weighs concealed carry bill(SD)
rapidcityjournal.com ^ | 2 March, 2012 | David Montgomery

Posted on 03/03/2012 9:55:13 AM PST by marktwain

Gov. Dennis Daugaard has some concerns about a bill to let South Dakotans carry concealed weapons without a permit, but is leaning toward signing it.

The governor read that measure, HB 1248, Friday morning and plans to listen to past testimony about the bill before making his decision. He’s particularly interested in concerns raised by law enforcement agencies, saying he “generally (tries) to support law enforcement.”

But the governor also frequently says he’s an active supporter of gun rights, and that feeling may come out on top with HB 1248.

“I may not sign it, but I am inclined to do so,” Daugaard said.

Contact David Montgomery at 394-8329 or david.montgomery@rapidcityjournal.com

(Excerpt) Read more at rapidcityjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: South Dakota
KEYWORDS: banglist; constitution; daugaard; sd
If the citizens of South Dakota put a little pressure on Governor Daugaard, he will sign this bill.
1 posted on 03/03/2012 9:55:24 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

It would take a real dunce to cave on this one.


2 posted on 03/03/2012 10:11:23 AM PST by Steamburg (The contents of your wallet is the only language Politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

IMHO the Guv is a committed Rino, having proven so as the lead man while Lt Guv, implementing a host of measures back in 2007 paving the way for obama care before obama care was anything other than daschle care and taking a large sum of federal cash to insure the state would continue to be compliant. Last year the legislature continued in the same vein passing more legislation continuing the process. The only thing even close to standing in the way is the supreme court case which may not be settled until 2014.

This year “the people” again took it in the shorts on a number of issues as the governors office and a host of lobbyists overrode the citizen testimonies on a number of important issues. For a conservative state, it was not an inspiring year. A few minor wins while the major issues went the way the main streamers in the party desired.

Oh, on the subject at hand, what does “shall not be infringed” mean? I’m guessing that his mind is made up and we are witnessing some theater, however the vote goes.


3 posted on 03/03/2012 10:27:41 AM PST by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson