Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sebelius: Fewer Babies Born Will Save Health Care Costs
Life News ^ | March 1, 2012 | Andrew Bair

Posted on 03/04/2012 1:41:08 PM PST by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last
To: NYer

What an idiot! Aside from the fact that responsibly having children is a blessing for parents and none of the government’s business, if she got her wish for significantly reduced birth rates, Social Security will be totally hopelessly doomed in 20 years.


21 posted on 03/04/2012 2:04:10 PM PST by mtrott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

In addition to a borderline evil statement, she is just plain WRONG. It might save a little money in the short term, but our ponzi-scheme based Social Security system only works if the population is growing. And anyone with a brain knows that the vast majority of health care costs are incurred in the last 10 years of life.


22 posted on 03/04/2012 2:05:01 PM PST by Scutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Applying her logic, we could eliminate all costs by eliminating the human race. Everything would be free. :)

Can these people see?
23 posted on 03/04/2012 2:05:15 PM PST by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Fewer babies born means fewer people paying into Socialist Insecurity.

Birth-control use among singles means wider spread STD outbreaks. Which leads to HIGHER health care costs.

Then there are the infertility problems from years of taking birth control (starting in puberty) which we can then pick up the costs of.

What is it about homosexuals that makes them anti-breeder?


24 posted on 03/04/2012 2:06:11 PM PST by a fool in paradise (If Obama brings troops home from Japan and Germany he can claim he won WWII finally as well as Iraq.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreatRoad

With four children, I did my part!


25 posted on 03/04/2012 2:06:20 PM PST by mtrott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Modern day Eugenics.


26 posted on 03/04/2012 2:08:00 PM PST by headstamp 2 (Liberalism: Carrying adolescent values and behavior into adult life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
How about more babies and fewer old folks? Would also save on Sosha Security payments.

This was Jocelyn Elder's stated position ("Those old people are just gonna die anyway!") and I suspect the real reason she was fired.

27 posted on 03/04/2012 2:09:07 PM PST by a fool in paradise (If Obama brings troops home from Japan and Germany he can claim he won WWII finally as well as Iraq.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

“And how soon will the China ‘one child per family’ policy come from these pigs?”

This would not harm them too much...conservatives and Christians tend to have much larger families then liberals. Our problem is that we also tend to send our children to public schools to learn from the liberals...I just don’t understand why...

Now that home schooling is growing they (the liberals) need to reduce the family size...


28 posted on 03/04/2012 2:18:21 PM PST by WorldviewDad (following God instead of culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: reg45
There will also be fewer people born to pay taxes to support all the government programs

...and more imported labor - much of which will have a backwards uncivilized religion to which it adheres fanatically.

29 posted on 03/04/2012 2:19:01 PM PST by Aria ( "If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PanzerKardinal

If her plan works out there will be no one to grow food,manufacture anything, etc.etc... Never could understand why they would want to live in their CREATION.


30 posted on 03/04/2012 2:21:01 PM PST by codder too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: NYer

If they are willing to kill the unborn how do you think the elderly fair in this


31 posted on 03/04/2012 2:26:11 PM PST by ronnie raygun (B B)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye; NYer; GreatRoad; headstamp 2; mtrott; EGPWS; Michael Barnes

I would suggest viewing the documentary “Demographic Winter” for a better understanding as to why the liberals would think this way...


32 posted on 03/04/2012 2:26:39 PM PST by WorldviewDad (following God instead of culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes

The LESS babies, the LESS tax base in the future; unless of course the liberals are working overtime on eugenics and the management thereof (*cough* sanger *cough*)


No they’re counting on the illegals to keep them in office where they can then tax the crap out of all the workers.


33 posted on 03/04/2012 2:27:32 PM PST by New Jersey Realist (America: home of the free because of the brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NYer

It’s a trick question of course, and one loaded with assumptions. If a system like Obamacare is assumed, you would want more relatively healthy workers to prop it up for the elderly and ailing (at least if you covet the latter’s votes). That makes it a bigger item in the budget, but that’s not necessarily a measure of how well it fulfills its ostensible purpose. However of course the whole Obamacare system is an abomination and should be abolished yesterday.


34 posted on 03/04/2012 2:29:47 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allmost
Applying her logic, we could eliminate all costs by eliminating the human race. Everything would be free. :) Can these people see?

Hey, are you demonstrating the absurd by being absurd? Watch out! :-)

As others have posted here, there are lots of ways to save health care costs, but are they moral, and who gets to decide which ones are acceptable to mandate and which ones are not? The govt? They truly do not believe in Freedom of Choice, do they?
35 posted on 03/04/2012 2:30:55 PM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: WorldviewDad
I'm watching it presently....

Thanks.

36 posted on 03/04/2012 2:32:08 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Where do we go to now?


37 posted on 03/04/2012 2:33:47 PM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Girlene

I applied a rule that led to extinction.


38 posted on 03/04/2012 2:34:48 PM PST by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Boy, she’s a regular Margaret Sanger, ain’t she?


39 posted on 03/04/2012 2:36:50 PM PST by FrdmLvr (culture, language, borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
in HELL: Hitler & Mao-tse ghostly souls, are grinning ear-to-ear w/ that statement.

40 posted on 03/04/2012 2:38:05 PM PST by skinkinthegrass (Simple: Kill the terrorists, Protect (all) the borders, ridicule all the (surviving) Liberals :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson