The Vetting, Part I: Barack's Love Song To Alinsky

Breitbart.com ^ | 3/4/12 | Andrew Breitbart

[bigtoona]

Prior to his passing, Andrew Breitbart said that the mission of the Breitbart empire was to exemplify the free and fearless press that our Constitution protects--but which, increasingly, the mainstream media denies us.

“Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?” – “Who guards the guardians?” Andrew saw himself in that role—as a guardian protecting Americans from the left’s “objective” loyal scribes.

Andrew wanted to do what the mainstream media would not. First and foremost: Andrew pledged to vet President Barack H. Obama.

Andrew did not want to re-litigate the 2008 election. Nor did he want to let Republicans off the hook. Instead, he wanted to show that the media had failed in its most basic duty: to uncover the truth, and hold those in power accountable, regardless of party.

From today through Election Day, November 6, 2012, we will vet this president--and his rivals.

We begin with a column Andrew wrote last week in preparation for today’s Big relaunch--a story that should swing the first hammer against the glass wall the mainstream media has built around Barack Obama.

[bigtoona]

Breitbart begins vetting zero from the grave!

[ncfool]

God bless Andrew. We should thank him by saying kaddash for him thru November 2012

[Rodney Dangerfield]

The ultimate irony - Andrew Brietbart stops the Obama charade from the grave.

[GOPJ]

This has been posted...

[allmost]

I love facts. I really dont care most of the time. Reality helps. Nothing here.

[bigtoona]

I searched again and I don’t see a posting for it...

[GOPJ]

It’s here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2854504/posts

[GOPJ]

My comment on the other thread:

Andrew knew the left could take care of themselves - he’s the person who coined the term: Democrat-media complex. The above paragrah doesn’t sound like Andrew - it sounds like some liberal saying all sides need to be held accountable. As if there’s parity between us in the MSM. There IS NO parity. That’s what Andrew - a freeper by the way - knew... That ‘regardless of party’ stuff is what I hear from every liberal... who wrote this?

[FrankR]

[bigtoona]

Thanks, I was searching keywords instead of title, thats why it didn’t come up for me earlier.

[Bobbisox]

I just read the article posted by Andrew...very powerful. Breitbart will truly be missed. Newt is mentioned at the end.

[GlockThe Vote]

WOW. That poster is damning! GO AB!!!!!

[StarfireIV]

Yehei shmëh rabba mevarakh lealam ulalmey almaya.
"May His great name be blessed for ever, and to all eternity"

[SumProVita]

This could get REALLY interesting...

[LyinLibs]

The tricky moslem can run. But he cannot hide.

[TEXOKIE]

bfl

[beaversmom]

He’s even big in his death. Way to go Andrew!

[larryjohnson]

Would you be willing to cut and paste the full text to my FReepmail,please. My sorry webtv won’t open the link. Thanks

[Servant of the Cross]

Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgement to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins – or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom – Lucifer … Saul Alinsky’s dedication of his book to his ‘master’

[DTogo]

BTTT!