Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin Demands Obama Super PAC Return Bill Maherís Campaign Donation
mediaite.com ^ | March 6, 2012 | James Crugnale

Posted on 03/06/2012 2:08:14 PM PST by grundle

Following President Obama‘s press conference where he invoked his daughters in responding to a question about why he personally contacted Georgetown University law student Sandra Fluke, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin blasted out a Facebook statement, demanding his return of Bill Maher‘s check. “Pres. Obama says he called Sandra Fluke because of his daughters,” Palin wrote cuttingly. “For the sake of everyone’s daughter, why doesn’t his super PAC return the $1 million he got from a rabid misogynist?”

In February, Maher, who once called Palin the c-word, announced he was donating $1 million to Priorities USA Action, a pro-Barack Obama Super PAC.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: democrats; elections; maher; nobama2012; obama; obamacampaign; sandytheslut
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 03/06/2012 2:08:19 PM PST by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grundle

Wonderful!


2 posted on 03/06/2012 2:10:18 PM PST by Leep (Dueling tag lines=don't worry,you'll be a vegetable guy soon<>It's gonna be a Newt day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

GO SARAH GO!


3 posted on 03/06/2012 2:10:41 PM PST by PeanutbutterandJellybean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
That's right, if they can push Rush's sponsors to cancellation, we should be able to push daddybama to return Maher's million bucks...that is, unless obama concurs with everything Maher says.

maher bucket
4 posted on 03/06/2012 2:11:36 PM PST by FrankR (You are only enslaved to the extent of the entitlements you receive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leep

Funny how Sarah is the one calling for this while the ones that are actually running for President do little.


5 posted on 03/06/2012 2:15:24 PM PST by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW; onyx

Sarah Ping!


6 posted on 03/06/2012 2:17:01 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Rush Limbaugh = the Beethoven of talk radio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Well played


7 posted on 03/06/2012 2:21:40 PM PST by School of Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: albie

“Funny how Sarah is the one calling for this while the ones that are actually running for President do little.”

Eunuchs don’t really do much.


8 posted on 03/06/2012 2:22:06 PM PST by Peet (Cogito ergo dubito.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Obama needs to return the money and that money belongs to and should go to Sarah.


9 posted on 03/06/2012 2:22:29 PM PST by Uncle Slayton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: albie

A Republican running for president feels that he must keep MSM happy. Nobody takes a stand on anything. When they do, they get whipped, no matter what it is.

This clearly is Romney’s plan, say little. Gingrich is tackling it head on, and his delegate count is rather low. Santorum used the word SATAN! and there was a flap about this.

MSM has a hugh amount of power in our open and free elections.


10 posted on 03/06/2012 2:25:24 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: albie

I think this is good. The ones running for President cannot fan the flames of this whole Rush/birth control issue. They need to be diverting from it and focusing on the issues that matter. Sarah can do this without any risk.


11 posted on 03/06/2012 2:26:30 PM PST by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Aw Jeez. Not Sarah Palin again.


12 posted on 03/06/2012 2:28:24 PM PST by McGruff (The south shall rise again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

A demand that won’t be met.

The Bill Mahers of the world are already far too invested with the Super PAC mentality supporting the now failing obama regime to even accept the return of the money, and the regime itself cannot disavow this support. They really believe that the attacks on Sarah Palin are fully justified, and they do not, cannot, accord her even a modicum of respect, for that is to lose the edge they believe they need to prevail in the hearts and minds of a sufficiently large segement of voters to assure themselves of electoral victory.

Or if that fails, make sure the fall-back plan of widespread vote fraud is in place. After all, it worked well in the Russian Federation elections recently, didn’t it?


13 posted on 03/06/2012 2:29:25 PM PST by alloysteel (Are Democrats truly "better angels"? They are lousy stewards for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

YES - don’t let this issue drop!


14 posted on 03/06/2012 2:33:01 PM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

If Zero does not publicly return that money it is an admission that he supports the use of such language with the American female voters.


15 posted on 03/06/2012 2:34:40 PM PST by Wordkraft (Remember who the Collaborators are come election day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

Invested literally. His whole shtick is slamming the enemies of Obama and of liberals in general. He has made a fortune making vile comments about the Catholic Church and conservative women, but Palin is his most common target.


16 posted on 03/06/2012 2:37:29 PM PST by RobbyS (Christus rex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Sounds like a fair and balanced reasonable request to me.

The POS Bill, should embarrass Obama in front of his precious daughters at the way he talks about women.


17 posted on 03/06/2012 2:37:34 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wordkraft

> If Zero does not publicly return that money it is an
> admission that he supports the use of such language with
> the American female voters.

That’s okay with them. As long as a Leftist says it, they’re cool with it. And even better if it’s directed at a conservative woman, and best of all if it’s directed at Palin.

The only people on Palin’s side in this are the people who have always been on her side. Conservatives.


18 posted on 03/06/2012 2:37:47 PM PST by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Wordkraft

Who’s going to tell them? Not Romney, I bet.


19 posted on 03/06/2012 2:38:29 PM PST by RobbyS (Christus rex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Leep

Oh HELL yea! This is what leadership looks like. You would
think as awful as BM (good initials for him) has been to the
Palins,she would not stir anything up that would engage him
further. But you would be wrong. Fearless!


20 posted on 03/06/2012 2:39:18 PM PST by americas.best.days...
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson