Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fluke and Liberals' Bodyguard of Lies
American Thinker ^ | March 8, 2012 | Tom Trinko

Posted on 03/08/2012 3:40:21 AM PST by servo1969

Winston Churchill declared that in war, truth was so precious that it must always be accompanied by a bodyguard of lies. Because liberals are at war with American society and their true beliefs are repugnant to most Americans, liberals constantly conceal the truth of their beliefs with sweet-sounding lies.

Liberals constantly create a cloud of lies about their support for tolerance and diversity to conceal the absolutely intolerant core of their faith. Americans are informed that tolerance requires them to accept pornography, abortion, gay marriage, casual sex, and everything else that liberals happen to like. Strangely, however, liberals are not required to tolerate things they don't like, such as calling Christmas Christmas.

Fortunately, the strange case of Ms. Fluke has parted the veil of lies and revealed the heart of the liberal faith.

Sadly, Rush's calling Ms. Fluke a couple of names -- names far less offensive than used by liberals to describe Sarah Palin, Michele Bachmann, Michelle Malkin, or Ann Coulter -- has diverted the conversation from Ms. Fluke's true evil.

Ms. Fluke believes that it is a good thing to use the full power of government, judicial and political, to force people to go against their moral principles. Like a Roman emperor of old, Ms. Fluke believes that if one will not burn incense before the idols of modern liberalism, that person should be crushed by the state.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: bodyguard; fluke; lies; rushlimbaugh; sandrafluke; sandytheslut; slut

1 posted on 03/08/2012 3:40:23 AM PST by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: servo1969

The progressive mantra -
“It’s none of your business what goes on in my bedroom! You will, however, be required to help pay for anything that happens there.”


2 posted on 03/08/2012 3:45:16 AM PST by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Liberals lie in defense of their war on America. Succinct, to the point and right on.


3 posted on 03/08/2012 3:46:59 AM PST by No One Special
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
Yep, Rush fell into their trap and he knows it.
If Rush hadn't fell for the trap they were hoping that someone else would have.
This is just typical Liberal Clap Trap.
4 posted on 03/08/2012 3:49:38 AM PST by DeaconRed (I live in FL We have voted already. Nothing else I can do. I am too broke to send any $$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

5 posted on 03/08/2012 3:51:16 AM PST by Zakeet (Obozo is to competent as an Etch-A-Sketch is to art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

“It’s none of your business what goes on in my bedroom!”

They want us to stay out of their bedrooms.

I would like them to stay out of my back pocket.

IMHO


6 posted on 03/08/2012 4:05:12 AM PST by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

7 posted on 03/08/2012 4:20:21 AM PST by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Mater tua caligas gerit ;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
"An old woman from one of the Baltic states who'd lived under Nazi and Communist oppression was asked which was worse.  Her answer was that if you did what the Nazis wanted, they left you alone, but the Communists demanded that you think what they thought.  Essentially the Nazis merely wished to enslave or possibly kill you, but the Communists wanted to steal your soul."

This is how it was. Plus, I might add that the Communist too, imprison or killed you ("accidents"), if you didn't do what they wanted.

8 posted on 03/08/2012 4:40:36 AM PST by OneHun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneHun

———the Communists demanded that you think what they thought-——

That is the attitude of many on Free Republic


9 posted on 03/08/2012 4:53:30 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 ..... Crucifixion is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bert
"That is the attitude of many on Free Republic"

I noticed that. 

10 posted on 03/08/2012 5:30:35 AM PST by OneHun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

The Constitution guarantees FREEDOM of RELIGION and the FREE EXERCISE thereof. I refuse to let the Dems take the focus off of that FACT.

Even Martin Luther King, Jr. understood this.

“I submit that an individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and willingly accepts the penalty by staying in jail in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the very highest respect for the law.”

...Martin Luther King, Jr., Letter from Birmingham Jail

It may come to that. I don’t want my tax dollars used for evil.


11 posted on 03/08/2012 5:51:41 AM PST by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No One Special

Our side, and our “leaders”, especially the actual conservatives,

need to stop accepting the premises of the left.

Those premises are simply lies and deceit in order to advance the underlying communist agenda.

We need to stop arguing about, for example, whether global warming is real and caused by human activity.
We need to go straight to the core, expose the left’s “solutions” (global taxes, global government, reduced lifestyle, etc), and declare them to be the goals and state that the “issue” of global warming is simply a means to that end.

Make them defend their goals, not the validity of the covering issue.


12 posted on 03/08/2012 6:00:12 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Isn’t the definition of a slut someone who has a lot sex with men none of which are her husband? Can we all agree if some woman gets in front of a congressional panel and states that she’s having so much sex, she can barely pay for all the birth control she needs, doesn’t she open herself up to the charge of at least being promiscuous? I mean, c’mon, she should have been laughed out of the room. Rush was pretty accurate in describing Flaky Fluke.


13 posted on 03/08/2012 7:31:43 AM PST by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

I think that is exactly right. If you try to fight against the false premise, global warming in this case, you are playing their game and letting them control the discussion; We are on the defensive. I know, because I have been there many times now on that specific issue.

The great point you make is that we have to control the discussion; THEY ARE COMMUNISTS. Their goals are socialism. THEY WANT TO FORCE THEIR BELIEFS ON US. And global warming, or ozone hole, or ice age or whatever else they come up with is just the vehicle to their goals..


14 posted on 03/08/2012 7:38:11 AM PST by Wildbill22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Didn’t Ayn Rand, in some of her work claim in order to fight the left ‘...you have to attack their premise’?


15 posted on 03/08/2012 7:43:27 AM PST by Wildbill22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Wildbill22

Global warming is one of the easiest front issues to get around.

Simply ask what their proposed solutions are.
They always involve reduced lifestyle, increased government control, and reduced individual freedom.
And, as Inhoff cornered some gal with this question, “will these initiatives actually reduce global CO2?” - she answered “no”, because it wouldn’t affect foreign countries.

So, since these measures won’t have any effect on the stated goal, the measures themselves must be the goal, correct?


16 posted on 03/08/2012 7:48:39 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Wildbill22

Originally, it was God, via Solomon:

Prov 26
4 Do not answer a fool according to his folly,
or you yourself will be just like him.
5 Answer a fool according to his folly,
or he will be wise in his own eyes.


17 posted on 03/08/2012 8:00:50 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson