Given that homosexuality is a comprehensive worldview, doesn’t this question amount to an unconstitutional religious test for officeholders?
I would tell them that my sexual orientation is GFY...
though the activist judges brought this on themselves...
My response to such a questio would be - “normal”.
Jim Quinn, of the Quinn in the Morning radio show, has what he calls “Quinn’s First Law”.
Liberalism always generates the EXACT OPPOSITE of it’s stated intent.
Since this appears to be the end result of the whole 1960’s Sexual Liberation Movement, a disc jockey who dropped out of college appears to be right once again.
- From Atlas Shrugged
“In order to make sure gays and lesbians are adequately represented on the judicial bench, the state of California is requiring all judges and justices to reveal their sexual orientation. The announcement was made in an internal memo sent to all California judges and justices.
[The Administrative Office of the Courts] is contacting all judges and justices to gather data on race/ethnicity, gender identification, and sexual orientation, reads an email sent by Romunda Price of the Administrative Office of the Courts. A copy of Prices memo was obtained by THE WEEKLY STANDARD.
Providing complete and accurate aggregate demographic data is crucial to garnering continuing legislative support for securing critically needed judgeships, Price writes.
The process of self-revealing ones sexual orientation is an element of a now yearly process. To ensure that the AOC reports accurate data and to avoid the need to ask all judges to provide this information on an annual basis, the questionnaire asks that names be provided. The AOC, however, will release only aggregate statistical information, by jurisdiction, as required by the Government Code and will not identify any specific justice or judge.”
California Asks Judges: Gay or Straight? (Feb 24, 2012, The Weekly Standard )
This is one of the main reasons why I never bought into the “Why can't we just let them love each other in peace?” argument that liberals and libertarians make to re-write marriage laws. I know what they are really up to.
Where is Ron Paul on this one?, Affirmative Action based on sexual desires? Gender identification?
How about Racial Identification? How come I can't get affirmative action for claiming I am a African American trapped in a while Male's body?
Sexual Orientation? yes.
if pressed, put “questioning”, since they are indeed “questioning” you.
In January, the Academic Senate recommended that upon accepting admission offers from a University of California school students should have the option of identifying themselves as lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, transgender, or pedophile.
isn’t this part of the homoagenda?
Actually, this is really interesting. Think about it; if they do start giving preferences to the sodomites in California in education, hiring and state jobs......maybe all the sodomites from the other states will flock to California! Then when Mexico annexes California, (with some prompting from the other states), Mexico can deal with them. That wouldn’t be such a bad deal!