Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney Won't Sign Up for Medicare
POLITICO ^ | March 12, 2012 | Jennifer Haberkorn

Posted on 03/13/2012 11:14:21 AM PDT by justiceseeker93

Gov. Mitt Romney, who turns 65 today, does not plan to enroll in Medicare, a program he has promised to transform if he wins the White House.

The former Massachusetts governor's campaign confirmed to POLITICO Monday that Romney plans to remain on a private health insurance plan and not enroll in Medicare, which provides health coverage to millions of Americans...

The decision puts Romney in a tiny minority. A vast majority of seniors chooose to participate in Medicare.

Nearly all seniors are automatically enrolled in Medicare Part A, which covers hospital care. But they can choose not to use it.

But 95 percent of senoirs choose to enroll in Medicare Part B, which covers physician services once they're eligible...

Medicare is likely to be a significant issue in the presidential race, and Democrats could use Romney's decision to demonstrate that he is out of touch with the average American senior.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: healthcare; insurance; medicare; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
Although I am not supporting Romney in the GOP primary process, he showed some guts here to publicly announce that he doesn't want or need Medicare. Perhaps other Americans turning 65 will learn that automatically enrolling in Medicare may not be the only option for them.

If attacked by the 'Rats for this personal decision, Romney could accurately say that he is leading by doing his bit to reduce the national deficit.

Obviously, the writer of this POLITICO piece has a discernable bias in favor of the Medicare program as is, commenting on Romney's decision in a snarky tone. Hopefully, most voters will consider Romney's personal health insurance coverage as a private, non-political matter - unless and until he enrolls in the gold-plated government insurance program if he should become president.

1 posted on 03/13/2012 11:14:23 AM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

I wish I was rich enough to be forced onto Medicare. My insurance policy requires that I must sign up for Medicare part-B to stay in the ex-employers group insurance.

When we moved to a new town, I had heckuva time finding a doctor who would accept new Medicare patients.


2 posted on 03/13/2012 11:17:49 AM PDT by entropy12 (Republicans do not hate, that is a monopoly of democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

“he showed some guts here to publicly announce that he doesn’t want or need Medicare”

I agree. Maybe Romney has more “core conviction” then some suggest, and what better way to express his disdain for a bloated entitlement society than rejecting the granddaddy of all federal programs?! Good for him.


3 posted on 03/13/2012 11:27:34 AM PDT by AtlasStalled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93
Although I am not supporting Romney in the GOP primary process, he showed some guts here to publicly announce that he doesn't want or need Medicare. Perhaps other Americans turning 65 will learn that automatically enrolling in Medicare may not be the only option for them.

Well, shoot, let's all just pat the Extreme Progressive Liberal on the back for his primary shenanigans.

"Showed some guts" my butt!

Romney doesn't have a principled bone in his body, everything he does is for selfish reasons as evidenced by his continual lying about his record and his character assasination on both Gringrich and Santorum.

Romney's record includes the following:

1. Support for Gay Adoption
2. He implemented Gay Marriage in MA, all by himself.
3. Support for Abortion
4. Support for Cap-and-Trade
5. Support for Global Warming
6. Support for Amnesty for Illegal Immigrants
7. Against GWB's Tax Cuts
8. Raised taxes/fees in MA by 300% during his tenure
9. Implemented Socialistic Healthcare called Romney care which included $50 Abortions and an Individual Mandate.

He's never repented of his past positions

He has no courage, he deserves no accolades, just our everlasting scorn.

4 posted on 03/13/2012 11:28:33 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

Big deal - if he does not participate in Medicare Parts B & D he will save about $150 in monthly premiums. Healthy Medicare participants’ premiums help subsidize those who use their Medicare benefits.

So, in fact - Mr. Healthy Romney is being a scrooge. He obviously does not understand the principles of risk management (i.e. medical insurance).


5 posted on 03/13/2012 11:31:03 AM PDT by sodpoodle ( Newt - God has tested him for a reason...... to bring America back from the brink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

Being on TriCare Prime right now and turning 65 on the 4th of April, I had to sign up for Medicare Part B as part of transferring to TriCare for Life (Or until Obama takes it away with an executive order).


6 posted on 03/13/2012 11:42:41 AM PDT by Redleg Duke ("Madison, Wisconsin is 30 square miles surrounded by reality.", L. S. Dryfus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

bully for him, I guess he’s not taking social security since MEDICARE is required if you do

Just decoupling the programs would give more people a choice

but then, if you have a couple hundred million in trust funds, you have many more noble choices


7 posted on 03/13/2012 11:49:44 AM PDT by silverleaf (Funny how all the people who are for abortion are already born)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

Good. Means testing is a rational place to start fixing it.
I respect him for doing so.


8 posted on 03/13/2012 11:52:11 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj; ExTexasRedhead; libertarian27; governsleastgovernsbest; freekitty; left that other site; ...

Ping!!!


9 posted on 03/13/2012 11:56:53 AM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

That’s almost a thread hijack. Lol.

I don’t care what Romney deserves, deserves got nothin to do with it. WE need Nobama.


10 posted on 03/13/2012 12:04:12 PM PDT by Williams (Honey Badger Don't Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: entropy12; All
My insurance policy requires that I must sign up for Medicare Part B to stay in the ex-employer's group insurance.

Yes, that is extremely common, if not almost always the case. Once government becomes an insurer, private insurance carriers tend to run away. The result is, or nearly is, a single payer monopoly for government within that area.

...I had a heckuva time finding a doctor who would accept new Medicare patients.

That problem stems from the federal government as well. Since Medicare doesn't reimburse doctors adequately for their services, doctors are dropping out of Medicare in droves. The financial cracks in the program are becoming more obvious to both patients and physicians.

11 posted on 03/13/2012 12:19:10 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

What a sacrifice... LOL


12 posted on 03/13/2012 12:22:30 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Abortion? No. Gov't heath care? No. Gore on warming? No. McCain on immigration? No.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled
...rejecting the granddaddy of all federal programs...

Just a quibble, but Social Security is more appropriately called "the granddaddy." It was passed in 1935, while Medicare didn't come in until 1965.

13 posted on 03/13/2012 12:23:54 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled
...rejecting the granddaddy of all federal programs...

Just a quibble, but Social Security is more appropriately called "the granddaddy." It was passed in 1935, while Medicare didn't come in until 1965.

14 posted on 03/13/2012 12:24:02 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
You are correct, of course, about Romney's record. As I said, I'm not supporting him in the GOP primary process.

But, as they say, even a broken clock in a junkyard is right twice a day.

Plus, contrast what he did upon turning 65 to what a Democrat running for president would probably have done. The Democrat would have held a press conference to show off his spanking new Medicare card!

15 posted on 03/13/2012 12:32:31 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

Isn’t that special!!!

We, the Peons and Peasants, haven’t the same freedoms , have we? Especially the freedom of choice-the one where we might want to choose whether we want SS OR Medicare...

http://thefundforpersonalliberty.org/medicare-lawsuit-update/index.html

but our betters...who have forgotten for whom they work..have decided Flyover Country is to good for such choice.


16 posted on 03/13/2012 12:36:11 PM PDT by mo (If you understand, no explanation is needed. If you don't understand, no explanation is possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
Just decoupling the programs would give more people a choice.

Exactly. And IIRC, the "coupling" was done completely by bureaucrats, not by Congress. Congress can and should prohibit "coupling" by specific legislation. Hopefully the GOP candidates can be questioned on that issue.

17 posted on 03/13/2012 12:43:38 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Williams
I don’t care what Romney deserves, deserves got nothin to do with it. WE need Nobama.

Well if you believe that with Romney as the Nominee the GOP wins the Presidency, with his Extreme Progressive Record, you're way out in left field.

If Romney is the nominee, Obama, and his minions in the MSM will utterly destroy him.

Obama will win in landslide proportions making John McCain's loss in 2008 look like a win for the GOP.

When you're candidate has:

1. Supported Gay Adoption
2. Implemeted Gay Marriage in MA, all by himself.
3. Supported Abortion
4. Supported Cap-and-Trade
5. Supported Global Warming
6. Supported Amnesty for Illegal Immigrants
7. Was Against GWB's Tax Cuts
8. Raised taxes/fees in MA by 300% during his tenure
9. Implemented Socialistic Healthcare called Romney care which included $50 Abortions and an Individual Mandate.

There is no difference between Obama and Romney except the words of a Liar(Romney).

The MSM will drudge up his sordid history and destroy him.

There is no win with Romney.
18 posted on 03/13/2012 12:52:30 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93
You are correct, of course, about Romney's record. As I said, I'm not supporting him in the GOP primary process.

If Romney is the nominee, the Media will destroy him with his sordid Progressive Liberal record as Governor.
19 posted on 03/13/2012 12:54:01 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled
I agree. Maybe Romney has more “core conviction” then some suggest,

Has nothing to do with being wealthy, just core convictions.</sarcasm>

20 posted on 03/13/2012 1:42:24 PM PDT by itsahoot (Tag lines are a waste of bandwidth, as are my comments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson