Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Japan threatens to engage missile defense; shoot down N. Korean missile in Mid-April
Yahoo! Japan News (in Japanese) rush, w/out transation ^ | 17 March 2012 | Yomiuiri Shimbun via Yahoo!Japan

Posted on 03/16/2012 10:25:50 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo

Rush-- w/out translation.

Japan is threatening North Korea with deploying and activating its own Missile Defense (MD) system, and shooting down the North Korean ICBM test launched scheduled from between 12 April and 16 April, a move stunningly announced by Pyongyang news sources yesterday and creating considerable tension in Northeast Asia suddenly.

No time to do an English translation now but am linking the breaking Japan story in Japanese. Will synopsize later, but wanted to get the thread and linked article up ASAP.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Japan; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dprk; japan; japanmissiledefense; japanmissledefense; kimjongun; missile; nkorea; northkorea; pac3; taepodong3
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: AmericanInTokyo

Woah... can they DO that Constitutionally? Did Japan change their laws... because I thought they could not have an offensive military, not that I am complaining mind you. I am merely surprised.


21 posted on 03/17/2012 12:19:11 AM PDT by Danae (Anail nathrach, ortha bhais is beatha, do cheal deanaimh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62
Probably not. Depends on the trajectory the NKs fire it on and therefore its altitude when crossing over Japanese territory. It is likely however to be too high (?) for the SM-3 Blk 1As to reach. The Patriots are (as someone else pointed out) endo-atmospheric terminal defense systems.

That said, it is still a good idea to deploy and make ready the missile defense assets. This is after all, NK rocket technology. There is a significant probability of a malfunction and the vehicle and payload (whatever it is) could fall way short. Being able to engage it and at least detonate/destroy the volatiles/fuel on board could reduce the risk to anyone under its footprint. Besides, even if they don't engage it, just having the sensors (radars, IR?) and crews on station and tracking it will provide valuable intel and training.

22 posted on 03/17/2012 12:31:38 AM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obama now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Danae

The best defense is a good offense.


23 posted on 03/17/2012 12:33:56 AM PDT by DrGunsforHands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
AiT, wonder who should be thanked for the ICBM technology n.korea possesses (clintoon or china), if the report is correct and n.korea does have ICBM capabilities? Could this be a bluff or a ruse perhaps by n.korea? (imho) n.korea does nothing without prior approval of china.
24 posted on 03/17/2012 12:35:48 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revel
Obama will say to Japan. “Just wait until after the election”...

There is plenty of things that 0bama could do to smooth things out, and to be statesmanlike... especially in this election year.

For example, 0bama could send a few taxpayer billion$ to North Korea AND Japan, so that Japan could feel better when Norkea launches...

Or, in a more strategic move, 0bama could unilaterally decomission more US Nukes, so that the Norks don't feel so threatened, when they do this launch "test".

If it's really Japan's feeling of insecurity at stake here, 0bama could, say, send BOTH Hillary! AND Halfbright, out of retirement of course, over to monitor the launch...

There is LOTS 0bomba could do here to improve the situation and make everybody feel much better!

25 posted on 03/17/2012 12:38:37 AM PDT by C210N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Danae

They revised defense protocols to Constitutionally allow for such an attack. I agree with many here that Japan has developed stuff that is not in the public eye and they will not hesitate to use, and then feign ignorance over the whole thing.


26 posted on 03/17/2012 12:41:22 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Obama: Illegals will get temporary visas if they can merely claim domestic violence, male on female)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

I stand corrected!


27 posted on 03/17/2012 12:43:40 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Obama: Illegals will get temporary visas if they can merely claim domestic violence, male on female)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

The real question is, how good is NK radar and telemetry? If the trajectory is low enough that a Japanese Aegis BMD DDG could engage it...and they did...who would know? The crew of the Destroyer, maybe the US Navy and Air Force who would also be watching. But if everyone agreed to keep their mouth shut about the um “unannounced operational readiness test/training event...” The NKs would simply think they’d had another malfunction. ;-) Hey, target missiles and range time are expensive. If the NKs are going to provide one, why not? I’m sure the Japanese sailors would be happy to scrub the decks and erase any missile exhaust soot before returning to port. “Who, me? I didn’t see nuthin’!”


28 posted on 03/17/2012 12:53:35 AM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obama now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ThunderSleeps

it would be real difficult to miss two missile contrails, what do you think this is? The coast of California?


29 posted on 03/17/2012 1:26:48 AM PDT by RaceBannon (Romney would surrender to Islam as fast as Obama promotes it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

a nervous LOL


30 posted on 03/17/2012 1:30:09 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

Yep, if the Russians, Chinese, North Vietnamese or North Koreans couldn’t shoot down a fast, high-flying plane (SR-71 and other variants) then an ICBM is out of reach, at least for now.


31 posted on 03/17/2012 1:54:54 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Ich habe keinen Konig aber Gott)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Radiated Spam

Once again, it is the newbie calling for the draft. Say hello to Mrs Rangel for us all.


32 posted on 03/17/2012 2:04:49 AM PDT by PghBaldy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
an ICBM is out of reach, at least for now

President Reagan may have some cards left to play yet? President Reagan probably left us a full deck. At least President Reagan loved this nation and wanted this nation to survive, unlike the present zer0. There are many like President Reagan at this site and throughout the nation. Betting our nation has a full deck. Thank you President Reagan. Miss him.

33 posted on 03/17/2012 2:16:53 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62
Okay...anything in the AO that CAN shoot it down?

If the missile was fired at Alaska, the GBIs based in silos there would have a shot at it (as it approached Alaska, not over Japan) The GBI has barely been tested under real-life conditions, but it is physically capable of the interception.

The issue isn't mostly the range of the trajectory, it's the acceleration and geometry of interception in boost or early mid-course. You need a truly enormous, very fast,very expensive missile - which the long-canceled Kinetic Energy Interceptor was.

The Aegis SM-3 Block II which has an IOC of 2018 has a shot at ICBMs in early midcourse. It will be the first missile so big it completely fills a strike-length VLS cell top to bottom, side to side - SM-3 can't get bigger after that without new ships/new VLS.

So until 2018 the Japanese can't do jack squat about any ICBMs flying over Japan.

The Japanese PAC-3s already exist so it isn't a big deal to "deploy" them. And any statements about them probably refer to intercepting a failed ICBM (which is a high probability) that happens to fall towards Japan.

All of this is basic physics known to all/open-source/unclassified, btw.

34 posted on 03/17/2012 3:20:12 AM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
"Obama cannot be relied upon 100%, Japan (and South Korea), or more or less on their own."

Obama can be 100% relied upon to only do what most advantages himself personally as well as his fellow travelers. That usually means betraying the friends of the US and helping its enemies.

35 posted on 03/17/2012 3:35:42 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
Just do it, quit talking!

Mike

36 posted on 03/17/2012 3:54:57 AM PDT by MichaelP (The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools ~HS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
An appropriate thread for displaying the FR Troll Defense System !

Good shooting !

37 posted on 03/17/2012 3:59:55 AM PDT by tomkat (FU.baraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

An SM-3 took out a satellite in orbit in Burnt Frost in 2008, don’t forget.


38 posted on 03/17/2012 4:26:03 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
If Japan (or the US) shoots down a NK missile, wouldn't that pretty much neuter the NK nuke program, and scare the hell out of any nation (Iran, Russia, Pakistan,...) hoping to use nuke tipped missiles as a threat or deterrent?

Seems to me that a shoot down pretty much puts the last nail in the coffin of North Korea.

OTOH, a failed attempt at a shoot down would embolden NK & other regimes.

39 posted on 03/17/2012 4:30:06 AM PDT by Mister Da (The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

AIT, by this time, I am sure the Japanese and Korean leaders have figured out just exactly how useless Obama is.

I personally do not think the US/Japan Security Treaty would last another four years of Obama. My gut feeling is that they are only holding on to it now because they’re praying with their most private and desperate hopes that he is defeated in November.

If he wins, or if he remains in office by other means, the Japanese will start thinking pragmatically about coming to an understanding with China.

China could dangle some considerably tasty bait to lure the Japanese out of the American alliance. Would they be willing to? Would the Japanese go for it? Ask me again in November.


40 posted on 03/17/2012 5:00:17 AM PDT by Ronin (Sarah.... We really need you now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson