Posted on 03/19/2012 2:11:33 PM PDT by dennisw
Democrats disappointed with President Barack Obama are withholding campaign donations, leaving him well below his campaigns fundraising goals, political analyst Karl Rove writes in an opinion column in The Wall Street Journal.
Reports issued by the Obama campaign show that donations have trickled in at a rate of about half of the $50 million a month needed to reach the campaigns goal of a $1 billion war chest for the 2012 race.
Through January, the president had raised an average of $24 million a month for his campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC). Compared with an average of $29 million in each of the previous three months, reported in July, Obama is on track to fall hundreds of millions of dollars short of his original goal, Rove wrote in Wednesdays issue of the Journal.
Its not for lack of trying, Rove said. Mr. Obama has already attended 103 fundraisers, roughly one every three days since he kicked off his campaign last April [twice his predecessors pace].
Reports show that fewer than 7 percent of Obamas 2008 donors renewed their support in the first quarter of his re-election campaign. The typical renewal rate of contributions is about one-fourth to one-third, Rove said. Former President George W. Bush had a renewal rate of about 20 percent in his 2004 re-election campaign.
Rove pointed to other troubling signs for Obama. His e-mail appeals generally ask for donations of $3, compared to the $10 to $50 donations as they did in 2008.
Nor are the appeals mostly about issues; many are lotteries. Give three bucks and your name will be put in a drawing for a private dinner with the president and first lady, Rove writes in the Journal.
This is clever marketing, but it suggests the campaign has found that only a low price point with a big benefit can overcome donor resistance among people who contributed via mail or the Internet in 2008, Rove writes. It also point to higher-than expected solicitation costs and lower-than-expected fundraising returns.
Statistics also reveal another problem for the president: He is burning through cash at a rapid rate. For instance, his campaign spent 25 percent of what it raised in the second quarter of 2011, compared to Bushs re-election expenditures of only 9 percent in the first quarter of 2003.
In the third quarter, spending was 46 percent of money raised for Obama compared with 26 percent for Bush; for the fourth quarter, Obama's spending was 57 percent vs. Bushs 40 percent.
This year, Obamas numbers worsen, Rove writes in the Journal. In January, his campaign spent 158 percent of its donations, compared with Bushs 60 percent in January 2004.
Team Obama and the DNC had $91.7 million in cash at the end of January. Bushs campaign and the Republican National Committee had $122 million in cash at the same point in 2004.
The Obama campaigns high burn rate doesnt come from large television buys, phone banks or mail programs that could be immediately stopped, Rove writes in the Journal. It appears to result instead from huge fixed costs for a big staff and higher-than-expected fundraising outlays. These are much tougher to unwind or delay. Left unaltered, they generally lead to even more frantic efforts to both raise money and stop other spending.
Rove pondered whether these problems perhaps explain why Team Obama told congressional Democrats last week not to expect a single dime for their campaign efforts from the Democratic National Committee this year. All the DNC funds will be needed for the presidents re-election.
“”He is burning through cash at a rapid rate””
What are they spending the money on? The campaign certainly is not reimbursing the taxpayers for all the taxpayer paid travel and WH government employees are working on the campaign so where’s the money going? Wonder if Debbie W-S in FL could clue us in??
Does anyone believe they are hard up for $$$$? Not me. They have more than enough sugar daddies to plug the holes.
I’d like to turn the spigot on Tokyo Rove. After I’ve passed the beer through my kidneys, of course.
Rove pondered whether these problems perhaps explain why Team Obama told congressional Democrats last week not to expect a single dime for their campaign efforts from the Democratic National Committee this year. All the DNC funds will be needed for the presidents re-election.
***************************************
If that is truly happening, it’s a real opportunity for Republicans to gain big majorities in the House and Senate. That should be the goal of Conservatives, whether Republican or Independant, regardless of which party wins the race for POTUS.
No, my point was that Obama has to run on his “record”, such as it is, rather than on promises and wishes. He can’t run on hot air, finger pointing, and empty rhetoric, even though that’s pretty much all he has.
His record stinks, partly because of his leanings, and partly because doing productive work and creating meaningful results is something he is not accustomed to.
Community organizer? How do you measure results with a job like that? Exactly when is the community organized? How do you know when its done? Heck, how do you know if it has started?
So, he’s lagging, rightfully. Not as much as he should, but as you say, the magic is gone, and that’s something.
Now comes the hangover.
I dont buy this Crap for a second,Fits right into Obozos Strategy,The RICH are against me,Boo Hoo,Im for the Little Guy, Vote for me,Im not like that Rich Bum Romney
No kidding. Poor little baraq can’t get funding.
Yeah right. MF Global lost 1.2 Billion and still no one knows where the money is. 1.2 Billion just doesn’t go missing. Right about that same time, baraq was bragging that he has around a billion raised. Connect the dots.
Also baraq, being the good team player he is, has told the congressional dimrats they would not be receiving any of his stash. Nice way to stab your fellow rats in the back.
Add to that baraq will get billions worth in fawning praise from his media that he won’t have to pay for.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.