Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Algae Racket
Townhall.com ^ | March 21, 2012 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 03/21/2012 3:44:59 AM PDT by Kaslin

Pond scum stinks. And so do the Obama administration's enormous, taxpayer-funded "investments" in politically connected biofuel companies. While the president embarks on a green rehabilitation tour this week to quell growing public outrage about big green boondoggles, the White House continues to cultivate a cozy algae racket.

Obama's promotion of algae as a fuel source at a campaign speech in Miami last month caught the nation's attention. But algae companies have been banking on administration support from Day One. In December 2008, when the White House announced the nomination of Energy Secretary Steven Chu, the CEO of Florida-based biofuels startup Algenol, Paul Woods, exulted to Time magazine: "You see this smile on my face? It's not going away. Everyone is really excited by this."

The next year, Woods and Algenol -- dubbed "Obama's favorite algae company" by Forbes magazine -- racked up $25 million in federal stimulus grants from Chu. Say cheese.

Yet another algae-based biofuels developer, Sapphire Energy, has absorbed $105 million in stimulus funds and loan guarantees even as doubts about the practicality, efficiency and viability of pond-scum fuels multiply. Sapphire's CEO, Jason Pyle, has donated exclusively to Democratic campaigns, candidates and committees -- and his company's website reads like a satellite White House communications office:

-- "President Obama Announces $14 Million Funding Opportunity To Develop Transportation Fuels from Algae";

-- "President Obama's Secure Energy Blueprint -- Industry Reaction";

-- "Obama Defends Energy Policy, Hitting Back At Presidential Candidates."

Another prominent DOE recipient in the world of blue-green sludge? San Francisco-based Solazyme. The manufacturer of algae-based renewable fuels has scooped up more than $21 million in federal stimulus grants and contracts. Solazyme's ties to the White House and the Democratic establishment in Washington are myriad. As blogger J.E. Dyer at HotAir.com (which I founded in 2006 and sold in 2010) reported in December, Solazyme's "strategic advisers" include TJ Glauthier -- a member of the Obama presidential transition team who just happened to work "on the energy-sector portion of the 2009 stimulus bill."

Andrew Stiles of the Washington Free Beacon writes that Glauthier:

"serves on the board of EnerNOC Inc., a company that provides demand-response services to electric utility firms. EnerNOC won a $10 million contract with the Department of Energy Resources in 2010 despite being underbid by competitors, the Boston Herald reported. Glauthier also served on the board of SunRun, a solar financing company that received a $6.7 million federal grant in 2010."

And in total, Glauthier adds, "Solazyme officials including Glauthier have contributed at least $360,000 to Democrats since 2007."

Wait, that's not all. The head of Solazyme's Washington lobbying office is Drew Littman, former chief of staff for Democratic Sen. Al Franken. Littman's old pal, entrenched D.C. lobbyist and Obama appointee Michael Meehan, feted Littman earlier this year and bragged that "we couldn't be more thrilled to be working on a daily basis with Drew and the Solazyme team."

Thanks to one of President Obama's executive orders, Solazyme secured a $12 million contract with the U.S. Navy to unload hundreds of thousands of gallons of biofuel -- priced at an estimated four to seven times the normal cost of regular jet fuel.

This self-sustaining crony ecosystem, powered by administrative fiat and wealth redistribution, gives new meaning to the phrase "green crude."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: algae; bho44; bhoenergy; woodsandalgenol
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 03/21/2012 3:45:03 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I think it warrants R&D...SUBSIDIZED BY THE PRIVATE SECTOR!


2 posted on 03/21/2012 3:48:49 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER ( Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

He’s got a bridge he’ll sell ya, too.


3 posted on 03/21/2012 4:25:54 AM PDT by the invisib1e hand (It was the best of times, it was the worst of times...well, half-right, at least.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

When’s Moochelle going to plagiar up something about the tax payer subsidized SDS pipeline that been shoved up her own back yard to provide subsidized water for a certain energy-related activity presently imposing itself upon the high plains East of Colorado Springs?

Frack that.


4 posted on 03/21/2012 4:36:49 AM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

TJ Glauthier — a member of the Obama presidential transition team who just happened to work “on the energy-sector portion of the 2009 stimulus bill.” Alongside the FT. HOOD murderer perhaps...


5 posted on 03/21/2012 4:56:13 AM PDT by NYCop (In Memory of Maj Francis E Visconti USMC, MIA since 22 NOV 65, but not forgotten)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Is the Corn Lobby out of money?


6 posted on 03/21/2012 4:56:31 AM PDT by hadaclueonce (you are paying 12% more for fuel because of Ethanol. Smile big Corn Lobby,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
>>Pond scum stinks.
 
And the appointee cronyism between Sean "Mr. SDS Rubber Stamp" Paige's special marital relationship with US Bank and the monopolist Colorado Springs Utility enterprise was rose water.  Uhuh.  How'come you never wrote about that Michelle?
 
http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sclient=psy-ab&q=Michelle+Malkin+"SDS+Pipeline"
 
Americans Presstitutes for [Crony] Prosperity.  FAIL.

7 posted on 03/21/2012 5:17:26 AM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Is there ANY policy of 0bama’s that doesn’t take taxpayer money and funnel it to democRat donors?


8 posted on 03/21/2012 5:24:35 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The Chicagoization of America continues.


9 posted on 03/21/2012 5:33:04 AM PDT by Standing Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Where would they get permits to build the millions of acres of algae farms that will be needed?
Nowhere on land. It requires too much land and too much water.
Nowhere in the ocean, too much fertilizer spill.
Algae ponds are just another expensive, wet and messy way to collect solar energy.
And they will never approve of harvesting existing algae in such quantities.
So this is a non-starter. Another Eco-ideology failure.

10 posted on 03/21/2012 5:40:32 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LomanBill
tax payer subsidized SDS pipeline

Can you provide a link to more information on this?

11 posted on 03/21/2012 5:48:24 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thackney

http://www.sdswater.org/

BOHICA


12 posted on 03/21/2012 5:52:26 AM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: thackney

If you trace the ownership and history of the Banning Lewis property East of Colorado Springs. You’ll see what a monumental exercise in Crony Cluster Fracking looks like.

http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sclient=psy-ab&q=SDS+Banning+Lewis

Water water everywhere and not a drop for development.


13 posted on 03/21/2012 6:09:41 AM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LomanBill

What energy project needs water located within the city of Colorado Springs?


14 posted on 03/21/2012 7:36:15 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Is fracking water intensive?


15 posted on 03/21/2012 6:47:12 PM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: thackney

http://csbj.com/2011/09/23/fracking-forces-el-paso-county-to-consider-regulation-stragegy/


16 posted on 03/21/2012 7:10:26 PM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LomanBill

Yes, but they are not going to give them the water for free.

How is selling water a subsidy?


17 posted on 03/22/2012 4:07:10 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: thackney

The citizens of Colorado Springs were NEVER given a chance to vote for or against that pipeline.

But they’re sure paying for it.


18 posted on 03/22/2012 6:51:16 PM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LomanBill

As will all the users of the water.

It is not a subsidy if the users are charged the cost. I am also confident that hydraulic fracturing is not going to use a significant portion of the water deliveried.

In Texas, we have nearly half the drilling rigs in the nations working here. The Eagle Ford Shale field take a very high amount of water compared to other shale fields for successful hydraulic fracturing of the field. We are far above the water use compared to other shale fields or drilling areas.

And that hydraulic fracturing amounts to about 1% of the areas total water use.

The water use is a couple millions of gallons per well, but that is a one time use. But SDS starts with a 50 million-gallons-per-day water treatment plant planned to expand to 100 million gallons per day.

Just how many wells do you think are going Colorado Springs? Hydraulic Fracturing will use some water from this system, very likely. But it is not the driving force for that much water, nor are the completion companies going to be given the water for free.


19 posted on 03/23/2012 6:05:41 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: thackney

>>It is not a subsidy if the users are charged the cost

Since when is government supposed to be in the business of selling anything, Comrade?


20 posted on 03/24/2012 8:09:52 AM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson