Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will Space Battles Be Fought with Laser Weapons?
Life's Little Mysteries ^ | 3/16/2012 | Adam Hadhazy

Posted on 03/22/2012 1:34:51 AM PDT by U-238

What would science fiction be without laser beams? From handheld ray guns to spaceship-mounted turbolasers, the futuristic weapon of choice definitely involves bright, colorful blasts of energy.

In the early 21st century, projectiles still remain the standard means of inflicting damage from a distance. Yet continued research into "directed-energy" weapons by the United States military, among others, could someday bring lasers to a battlefield near you.

Lasers are already used in guidance, targeting and communication applications, but significant technological obstacles stand in front of turning them into weapons by themselves. For certain niche scenarios, lasers might prove themselves ideal. It seems unlikely, however, that they will ever outright replace missiles and bullets, as they do in so much sci-fi warfare.

No conventional weapon is a panacea," said Douglas Beason, former associate lab director at Los Alamos National Laboratory. "Why would we expect directed-energy weapons to be any different?"

Why lasers?

Lasers are tight rays of photons generated by the excitation of atoms in a liquid, gas or solid; or electrons in a beam. Weapon makers are attracted to lasers because they can shoot faster than any projectile. "You can deliver energy at the speed of light," said Beason.

They also can reach targets with absolute precision while potentially never running out of ammunition. "They call it unlimited magazines," said Beason. "Rather than being able to drop one bomb, you're limited only by the amount of energy you can carry."

(Excerpt) Read more at lifeslittlemysteries.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: dew; directedenergy; laserbeams; lasercannons; lasers; photons; physics; rayguns; spacewarfare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: U-238

Just by moving something in the way of a fast moving spacecraft or satellite and causing it to fragment into thousands of pieces of debris will be the next generation of space weapons to be used.


21 posted on 03/22/2012 3:30:18 AM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom

I’d have to say that it all depends on the target. After all you can fling a rock at a space station and destroy it. The “Rod from God” is basically a tungsten telephone pole launched from space at a ground based target. It comes in at hypersonic speed and delivers some serious energy that way.


22 posted on 03/22/2012 3:31:55 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: U-238
Hardly. With the decimation of the military, de-stocking the nuclear deterrent, funding mudslim-bruderhood, more likely future wars will feature Spit-Balls.


23 posted on 03/22/2012 4:35:02 AM PDT by C210N (Mitt "Severe Etch-a-Sketch" Romney is the front-runner? Seriously??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: U-238

Man the mirrors!


24 posted on 03/22/2012 4:50:15 AM PDT by WackySam (Obama got Osama just like Nixon landed on the moon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

Would it not be the same for the laser?

You fire a three second laser pulse and you have that 3 second length of laser beam continuing thru space until it hits something? Granted after a few light years it may be dissipated?


25 posted on 03/22/2012 4:55:09 AM PDT by PeteB570 ( Islam is the sea in which the Terrorist Shark swims. The deeper the sea the larger the shark.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MCCC

They also don’t make a big bang or flash when you pull the trigger. Although the projectile would be supersonic, it would make locating the firing point more difficult; thereby improving concealment.


26 posted on 03/22/2012 5:10:05 AM PDT by catman67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: WackySam

GI Joe is way ahead of you there. Doc built these in his spare time while being a doctor and learning to drive a tractor trailer in his on base one man factory.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGx1Bqgkg08


27 posted on 03/22/2012 5:40:58 AM PDT by wally_bert (It's sheer elegance in its simplicity! - The Middleman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570

Due to diffraction the beam will spread out over long distances. Within relatively short astronomical distances the intensity will be below eye safe levels.


28 posted on 03/22/2012 6:23:56 AM PDT by Laserman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MCCC
There would be a recoil. The momentum of a system is conserved, according to Newtonian Laws, so the momentum of the projectile (mproj x vproj) is equal to the momentum of the launch system (mlaunch x vlaunch) in the opposite direction, regardless of the launch mechanism.

It's not just a suggestion, it's the Law! (according to Newton)
29 posted on 03/22/2012 7:00:29 AM PDT by lagrange point1 (Space is no longer the final frontier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lagrange point1

I don’t believe I am breaking Newton’s law.. The momentum is not occuring down the long axis of the ‘barrel’ but between the magnets exerting force imparting momentum inward and the projectile exerting force outward in response. Thus the momentum sum continues to zero itself. Thus my continued response that there is no recoil in the classic sense.


30 posted on 03/22/2012 7:45:28 AM PDT by MCCC (Owning a gun and saying you are armed is like owning a piano and saying you are a musician.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: wally_bert
Wow.

In that clip, we see photon-capacitors (never heard of those before) used to collect laser energy, then we have laser beams arcing due to the gravitational effects of the Earth.

Science fail.


31 posted on 03/22/2012 7:52:24 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MCCC
Are you an idiot or mearly obtuse?

between the magnets exerting force imparting momentum inward and the projectile exerting force outward in response. Thus the momentum sum continues to zero itself.

If the forces exerted are symmetrical then the projectile goes nowhere. If the forces are asymmetrical the launcher accepts the inverse of the projectiles acceleration, summing the system to zero. Unless you are using a definition of recoil different than any I have ever seen, the rearward movement of the launching mechanism in response to the acceleration of the projectile is the recoil.

32 posted on 03/22/2012 12:52:15 PM PDT by Fraxinus (My opinion, worth what you paid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570

True but a laser pulse would get out of the neighborhood a lot faster.


33 posted on 03/22/2012 4:24:13 PM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Fraxinus

Nice to meet you too. Can you think of another way to respond to my posts other than an insult? I wish you well and better in your future endevours.


34 posted on 03/22/2012 7:44:57 PM PDT by MCCC (Owning a gun and saying you are armed is like owning a piano and saying you are a musician.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson