Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Santorum's lost message
The Hill ^ | March 21, 20012 | A.B. Stoddard

Posted on 03/22/2012 11:43:32 AM PDT by RitaOK

Santorum’s lost message By A.B. Stoddard - 03/21/12 06:22 PM ET

Somewhere, buried in Rick Santorum’s fatally flawed campaign messaging, were winning words. Had he committed to them, the former senator could have derailed Mitt Romney’s path to the GOP nomination. Despite Romney’s overpowering resources and organization, Santorum’s potent argument — that the party could not throw the issue of healthcare away by nominating someone who had supported mandates — was his key to victory, but he threw it away.

As he transformed from Senator 2 Percent to the last credible alternative to Romney, Santorum often made the point that nominating Romney — or Newt Gingrich — would take the issue of healthcare off the table and benefit President Obama, as both Gingrich and Romney had declared support for mandates to purchase healthcare during their careers. Santorum also repeated, early on, that Gingrich and Romney had both supported the Troubled Asset Relief Program as well as cap-and-trade proposals, making him the only true conservative in the race.

With little money or staff, Santorum won Iowa and then three surprise victories on Feb. 7 in Colorado, Minnesota and Missouri. He rocketed from the bottom as a passionate, articulate, indefatigable campaigner who took every question from every eager voter. It was the pivotal moment in the race none of the Romney rivals who preceded him had achieved — and Santorum blew it. He veered off course, and out of this millennium, enthusiastically bemoaning birth-control pills, free prenatal testing and college education. He insulted Obama, calling him a snob, and President Kennedy. Santorum, a devout Catholic, said Kennedy’s insistence on a strong separation of church and state made him want to throw up.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

More from The Hill: ♦ Romney to meet with DeMint, Ryan ♦ ACLU rips employers who demand worker Facebook passwords ♦ Prop 8 lawyers threaten to sue MPAA over ‘R’ rating for ‘Bully’ ♦ Web traffic: Obama's site draws more than GOP field combined ♦ Obama: Romney 'pretending' he had different health plan ♦ Lawmaker to offer personal plea against military hazing ♦ Senators call on Obama to halt further Afghan troop withdrawals ♦ Dem senator presses Army on PTSD cases ♦ McCaskill deals blow to next round of military base closures

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On the night he lost the Michigan primary to Romney by 3 points, the exit polls told the story. He could have easily made up the votes to win from some of the women Romney won, the Catholics Romney won, the older voters Romney won, the voters earning more than $100,000 whom Romney won, and those voters with college degrees Romney won. That night Santorum seemed to acknowledge he had let it slip away — he brought out his mom and paid tribute to her education and years as a working mother, as well as his daughter and his wife. And he called Obama’s healthcare law the biggest issue in the campaign, a question of fundamental freedom: “They’re going to give you the right to healthcare; that’s what President Obama promised. But, of course, when the government gives you a right, they can take that right away. And when the government gives you that right, they can tell you how to exercise that right. And they do — not just what doctors you can see and what insurance policies or how much you’re going to get fined if you don’t do what the government tells you to do, but even go so far as to tell you how to exercise your faith as part of your healthcare bill. If the government can go that far with ObamaCare, just think what’s next.”

Combined with his push for fewer business regulations and less taxation, Santorum’s message on ObamaCare was all he needed to win over enough Romney voters to close the gap and beat him. It was the key to his appeal to independent voters, and to those voters focused more on the economy than the social issues Santorum has built a reputation championing.

But he strayed, and lost Ohio by 1 percentage point. Then he strayed again, decrying the dangers of porn, claiming the Obama administration “seems to favor pornographers over children and families” because it has “refused to enforce obscenity laws.” So this week he lost Illinois by more than 11 points. He won’t recover.

Stoddard is an associate editor of The Hill


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: campaign; message; santorum; santorumlostmessage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Vendome

bttt


21 posted on 03/22/2012 8:48:22 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Newt/Sarah 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bizhvywt

Oh good. I’ll tell the Catholic Bishops they can breathe a sigh of relief knowing that that’s all it was.


22 posted on 03/22/2012 9:27:16 PM PDT by Lauren BaRecall (I declare for Santorum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

The Louisiana turnout on March 24 is expected to be just 10 percent, a good opportunity for Mittens to prevail again. People there usually vote for someone they have heard of.


23 posted on 03/23/2012 4:43:41 AM PDT by Theodore R. (Past is prologue: The American people have again let us down in this election cycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK
Newt is well defined by his enemies This expression was first used by Democrats in support of Grover Cleveland in 1884! The only question now is who endorses Romney first, Newt or Saint Rick.
24 posted on 03/23/2012 4:46:26 AM PDT by Theodore R. (Past is prologue: The American people have again let us down in this election cycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

Hopefully, if a cave for Romney must occur that conceivably Newt and Rick jointly at convention do their caving. Hope they hold out until then given the protest to Romney-E going on out here. What do you think?


25 posted on 03/23/2012 9:47:34 AM PDT by RitaOK (LET 'ER RIP, NEWT. Newt knows where all the bodies are buried, because he buried them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

This is being misinterpreted, especially by the pro-Romney crowd, which is desperately grasping at any straw to erase the Etch-a-Sketch remarks.

Romney is too much like Obama — that Mitt is a RINO whose record looks like that of Obama and thus, you can choose either one and get essentially the same thing.

You might remember that Mittens voted for Tsongas.

Romney has said that he is for a national health mandate (Obamacare), even though he is denying that right now. You can find him saying that he is for a mandate on a NATIONAL level, on Youtube.

*Romney ran as a PRO-CHOICE candidate for Governor

*Romney supported Cap and Trade

*Romney supports a national healthcare mandate and is the creator of Romneycare (the blueprint for Obamacare)

*Romney helped give Massachusetts gay marriage

*Romney believes in man-made global warming

*Romney was for the bail outs


26 posted on 03/23/2012 10:52:17 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson