Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Health Care Reform Celebration for Obama
Real Clear Politics ^ | 3/22/12 | Laura Mecklerk , WSJ

Posted on 03/22/2012 10:34:05 PM PDT by Nachum

President Barack Obama's health-care law turns two years old Friday, and his reelection campaign is celebrating with mailers and phone calls to supporters. The White House posted video testimony of people who have been helped. The secretary of Health and Human Services is traveling the country to tout the benefits. And the campaign formed a group, Nurses for Obama, to make the case in communities across the country.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: care; celebration; health; reform
We should shove this down his throat, like he shoved it down ours.
1 posted on 03/22/2012 10:34:16 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Joe Biden said it was a big “f” deal.

And even now, liberals tell us that people like Obamacare, when they learn what’s in the bill.

It’s incredible, in a way, that we’re still learning two years after the thing was passed what’s in it. Liberals are still re-educating us about the healthcare utopia which awaits us all, when this law is fully implemented in 2014.

This bill is a poster child for things that are wrong in Washington. And among those is that Congress passes 2,000 page bills which nobody has read, and which contain things people didn’t know about.

It’s a poster child for other things, such as ramming and cramming legislation down out throats, using questionable parliamentary manuvering to do so.

Remember the bribery? Senator Mary Landrieu, when confronted with reports that Louisiana got an extra $100 million in Obamacare, corrected reporters that the true amount of the payoff was $300 million! She openly admitted that a payoff was buried in that bill, and as a good Democrat, has no remorse or shame about things like that.


2 posted on 03/22/2012 11:16:25 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The cancer of Obama”care” now extends to choosing a “Public health expert for the World Bank Presidency.”
_______

The major problem with THE NINE SUPREMES is that they are chosen for political reasons by the POTUS, and then they vote as an un-accountable democracy, for a Nation that is NOT a Democracy, but a REPUBLIC.

As a result, THE NINE SUPREMES commonly vote 5 to 4 on most issues. Constitutionality is seldom a consideration, and their up-coming ruling on Obama”care” will prove my point.

Now is the time to stand and deliver to address our grievances to the dictates of the Left.

Oppose the dictates of Dictator Baby-Doc Barack!

Our ONLY chance to ABOLISH Obama”care” rests with THE NINE SUPREMES, because Romney will be defeated by Obama.

IMHO, if Romney is anointed as the RNC Nominee, THE main issue in the National Election, Obama”care,” will be taken off the campaign table. Hence, Romney will not only lose, but suffer another crushing, and sadly typical, RINO defeat.

To those who want poster ideas, here are a few ideas for demonstration posters:

Obama”care” was robo-signed by Congress, and is therefore illegal.

Obama”care” was 2700 pages long, and is still being written, but not by Congress: witness the forced contraception coverage recently added by HHS Regulators.

Obama”care” has caused “The Catholic Spring.”

Obama”care” reduces competition, and therefore is illegal by the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law.

Obama”care” is designed to be a US Federal Government monopoly, with no competition.

Obama”care” also is illegal according to the US Constitution, because it violates our freedom of choice.

Will THE NINE SUPREMES notice any of these three violations? I seriously doubt it.

Impeached Bill Clinton proved that the US President is above US Federal Law, so anything that the President wants he gets, regardless of the Federal Laws that he has violated.


3 posted on 03/23/2012 8:21:30 AM PDT by Graewoulf (( obama"care" violates the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND is illegal by the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson