To: Astronaut
Amen Astronaut, we have to defeat Obama and while I'm not a big Romney fan, I will vote for him and pray he wins.
If for no other reason we need an “R” in the WH because there will most likely be one or two Supreme Court judge's appointed in the next 4 years. I can't believe Romney would nominate a flaming liberal and I know Obama would.
To: bestrongbpositive
If for no other reason we need an R in the WH because there will most likely be one or two Supreme Court judge's appointed in the next 4 years. Very true. And don't forget all the Federal district judges that are likely to be appointed in the next four years.
I shudder to think who Obama will appoint should he get four more years.
59 posted on
03/23/2012 8:53:28 AM PDT by
Leaning Right
(Why am I carrying this lantern? you ask. I am looking for the next Reagan.)
To: bestrongbpositive
I can't believe Romney would nominate a flaming liberal... Nope, he would nominate a flaming liberal and guarantee that he is a severe conservative.
84 posted on
03/23/2012 9:36:31 AM PDT by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: bestrongbpositive
If for no other reason we need an R in the WH because there will most likely be one or two Supreme Court judge's appointed in the next 4 years. You're unaware of the liberal justices Romney packed the courts with in Massachusetts?
Or that Anthony Kennedy has said he won't retire with Obama in the White House but he likely would with Romney in it? Who says Romney isn't going to stick us with another David Souter and move the court to the left in that scenario?
106 posted on
03/23/2012 10:42:29 AM PDT by
Kazan
(Mitt Romney: The greater of two evils)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson