Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/26/2012 6:26:23 AM PDT by Mozilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Mozilla

Well, somebody needs to. Are New York Times reporters sacred?


2 posted on 03/26/2012 6:27:13 AM PDT by AlmaKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mozilla; al baby

Why is this a BFD?

Did you see the words they were using at the Obama fundraisers?


3 posted on 03/26/2012 6:30:10 AM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mozilla
In response to repeated questions on the matter, Santorum told reporters that Romney was an unfit Republican nominee because of his work on health care as former Massachusetts governor.

Romney is an unfit nominee because he doesn't care about the First Amendment's freedom of religion, the Second Amendment's right to keep and bear arms, or the Ninth and Tenth Amendment restrictions on the scope of federal power. If the GOP leadership forces Romney's nomination through, their party deserves to die. I just hope America will survive (without resorting to another civil war) despite both major parties joining in treason.

4 posted on 03/26/2012 6:35:31 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mozilla

Yeah, Rick was set up by the NYT, but he showed that he has the “fire in the belly” to take on the current owners of THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION: the Liberal Agenda Media, or LAM.

The NYT is trying to provide a smokescreen on the BS topic just before THE NINE SUPREMES begin to think about Obama”care.”

___________

Here is a dose reality to you, my FRiends:

Dictator Baby-Doc Barack has ALWAYS ignored The US Constitution, ESPECIALLY with Obama”care.”

The cancer of Obama”care” now extends to Obama last week choosing a “Public health expert” for the World Bank Presidency.
_______

The major problem with THE NINE SUPREMES is that they are chosen for political reasons by the POTUS, and then they vote as an un-accountable democracy, for a Nation that is NOT a Democracy, but a REPUBLIC.

As a result, THE NINE SUPREMES commonly vote 5 to 4 on most issues. Constitutionality is seldom a consideration, and their up-coming ruling on Obama”care” will prove my point.

Now is the time to stand and deliver to address our grievances to the dictates of the Left.

Oppose the dictates of Dictator Baby-Doc Barack!

Our ONLY chance to ABOLISH Obama”care” rests with THE NINE SUPREMES, because Romney will be defeated by Obama.

IMHO, if Romney is anointed as the RNC Nominee, THE main issue in the National Election, Obama”care,” will be taken off the campaign table. Hence, Romney will not only lose, but suffer another crushing, and sadly typical, RINO defeat.

To those who want poster ideas, here are a few ideas for demonstration posters:

Obama”care” was robo-signed by Congress, and is therefore illegal.

Obama”care” was 2700 pages long, and is still being written, but not by Congress: witness the forced contraception coverage recently added by HHS Regulators.

Obama”care” has caused “The Catholic Spring.”

Obama”care” reduces competition, and therefore is illegal by the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law.

Obama”care” is designed to be a US Federal Government monopoly, with no competition.

Obama”care” also is illegal according to the US Constitution, because it violates our freedom of choice.

Will THE NINE SUPREMES notice any of these three violations? I seriously doubt it.

Impeached Bill Clinton proved that the US President is above US Federal Law, so anything that the President wants he gets, regardless of the Federal Laws that he has violated.


5 posted on 03/26/2012 6:39:44 AM PDT by Graewoulf (( obama"care" violates the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND is illegal by the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mozilla

Good on Rick.


6 posted on 03/26/2012 6:42:38 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network ("The door is open" PALIN 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mozilla

I have no problem with Rick Santorum calling BS on a New York Times reporter trying to bait him. However, if he intends to run a national campaign against Obama he should be prepared for this kind of rubbish all day long. Santorum must realize that the MSM is totally in the tank for Obama and little more than his PR team. Santorum will constantly get this kind of set-up, ‘gotcha!’ question from the MSM but he has to discipline himself to keep his temper in check and not sound as if he’s whining. Leaders don’t whine.


10 posted on 03/26/2012 6:55:13 AM PDT by Jim Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mozilla
This is truly comical. When Gingrich calls the press out on something, he's showing courage, spine, the champion of the of oppressed conservative masses. When Santorum does it, well he's just a juvenile, whiner, crybaby. I'm sure I'll have a Gingrich supporter explain the nuanced difference to me shortly, though.
28 posted on 03/26/2012 8:14:32 AM PDT by throwback ( The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson