[stephenjohnbanker]

You are being cautious....good!

So am I. We will get the usual “jump on the Ryan Bandwagon”

FReepers.

[sickoflibs]

RE :”You are being cautious....good!
So am I. We will get the usual “jump on the Ryan Bandwagon”
FReepers.”

Things are so bad that those that get the “Means Well” awards are crowned our heroes, kind of like the R primary.

[Gilbo_3]

You are being cautious....good!

heheheheh...cautious ???...hehehehbwAHAHAHHAHAH...

i sunk that ship looooooong ago when i demanded that MY *representative* MUST do more than pay lip service [hint greengrinch] to balancing the books...

i said take a friggin meataxe to it, let the chips fall where they may, and shrink it back to size...

more lip service in 'saying' theyre going to do it 'on day one' w/o a plan to carry thru post bi-partisan stonewalling doesnt cut it...neither does a 5, 10 or 40 yr plan to fix it later, after the taxes are jacked and collected...

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

You are being cautious....good! So am I. We will get the usual “jump on the Ryan Bandwagon” FReepers.

I think it's likely that the left will be able to use the new Ryan budget proposal to their advantage.

Wasserman-Schultz: "It is a Republican path to poverty that would pass like a tornado through America’s nursing homes where millions of America’s seniors receive long-term and end-of-life care."

I think there may be stroke victims that would have problems paying for nursing care (unable to find a private plan that paid for it) under the Ryan plan, although it's not in the form of a bill. But I think Wasserman-Schultz seems to be ignoring the fact that last year Sebelius cancelled the long term care feature if Obamacare "CLASS" because even she admitted it was a financial loser.

This is what worries me: If the GOP can never do anything about entitlements because Dems will use it against them, how can we avoid becoming Greece?