Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Paul Clement Won the Supreme Court’s Oral Arguments on Obamacare
New York ^ | March 27, 2012 | Jason Zengerle

Posted on 03/27/2012 4:36:28 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-173 next last

1 posted on 03/27/2012 4:36:35 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I wish I shared Mr. Zengelre’s confidence in the integrity of SCOTUS...but I do not.


2 posted on 03/27/2012 4:40:55 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
*perspective ping*

(you'll prolly get tired of this before it's over ;-)

3 posted on 03/27/2012 4:42:52 PM PDT by tomkat (FU.baraq !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Amen


4 posted on 03/27/2012 4:43:11 PM PDT by doc1019 (Romney will never get my vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead; Kaslin; SunkenCiv; SJackson; zendari; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Impy; ...

Even supporters of Obamacare are privately admitting that Paul Clement is doing an effective job. Remember that name. If Obama is defeated for reelection, Clement may be headed for the Supreme Court again, this time as a member.


5 posted on 03/27/2012 4:43:39 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (A chameleon belongs in a pet store, not the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
+1
6 posted on 03/27/2012 4:43:59 PM PDT by tomkat (FU.baraq !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Me neither!


7 posted on 03/27/2012 4:47:32 PM PDT by ConjunctionJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

“Clement may be headed for the Supreme Court again, this time as a member.”

unfortunately Romney has no record of nominating or supporting conservatives for any court anywhere so I wouldn’t hold your breath..


8 posted on 03/27/2012 4:48:34 PM PDT by Breto (The Establishment party is killing our country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

As others have suggested the Individual Mandate was always a throwaway to get the heavy taxes inside the bill enacted. The goal here is to keep the rest of the Bill alive even though there is no sever ability clause in it.


9 posted on 03/27/2012 4:49:46 PM PDT by Mechanicos (Why does the DOE have a SWAT Team?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy; little jeremiah; wagglebee

I forgot to ping you to Posting #5.


10 posted on 03/27/2012 4:50:34 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (A chameleon belongs in a pet store, not the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Breto

The lawyer that argued against the government yesterday was similarly excellent...Greg Katsos. I enjoyed listening to him make his argument.


11 posted on 03/27/2012 4:51:08 PM PDT by Ethrane ("obsta principiis")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Breto

The lawyer that argued against the government yesterday was similarly excellent...Greg Katsos. I enjoyed listening to him make his argument.


12 posted on 03/27/2012 4:51:14 PM PDT by Ethrane ("obsta principiis")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Breto

And that’s one of my many concerns with Romney getting the nomination.


13 posted on 03/27/2012 4:51:44 PM PDT by ConjunctionJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
handled them with aplomb...
14 posted on 03/27/2012 4:55:53 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (obamacare is an oxymoron.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomkat

In my 60-plus years the government has been ever-expanding. I’ll be very surprised if this expansion is not allowed.


15 posted on 03/27/2012 4:56:58 PM PDT by radioone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
Heh. I wonder where Clement got his recasting of the inactivity argument.

cboldt says:
I think it is pretty clear that the "activity" "inactivity" distinction is a diversion from the text of the constitution.

Does Congress have the power to compel commerce?

May 10, 2011, 11:24 pm


16 posted on 03/27/2012 4:58:06 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

He didn’t win; whoever wrote the law lost. Perry Mason couldn’t defend the mandate. Lionel Hutz couldn’t fail to argue it down.


17 posted on 03/27/2012 5:00:15 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane; Williams

That’s an interesting way of looking at it.


18 posted on 03/27/2012 5:02:10 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (A chameleon belongs in a pet store, not the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

New Gummint Business Model:

1. Do nothing until it becomes a crisis
2. Create gummint solution
3. Pass and/or deem it passed by partisan hack legislature
4. Stack the bench to be sure it’s upheld in court
5. Lose money by failing to implement cost controls
6. Make it up in volume (add 25 million to the free HC dole)


19 posted on 03/27/2012 5:03:42 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
One of the most chilling things in the argument was this segment of SG Verrilli's closing statement:

There is no temporal limitation in the Commerce Clause. Everyone subject to this regulation is in or will be in the health care market. They are just being regulated in advance.

20 posted on 03/27/2012 5:05:46 PM PDT by Repealthe17thAmendment (Is this field required?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-173 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson