Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lord Monckton: Sheriff Joe, posse 'right to be worried' (Thatcher's fraud detective on video)
World Net Daily ^ | March 28, 2012 | Unattributed (Monckton on video)

Posted on 03/28/2012 10:16:00 PM PDT by Seizethecarp

After a visit to Phoenix to get a first-hand look at evidence collected by Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his investigative team, former Margaret Thatcher policy adviser Lord Christopher Monckton says he is convinced that the document presented by the White House as Barack Obama’s birth certificate is fraudulent.

Monckton, known internationally for his climate-change skepticism, told WND he didn’t pay much attention to the controversy surrounding Obama’s birth certificate until he watched Arpaio and his team present their preliminary findings at a March 1 news conference. The sheriff’s Cold Case Posse has concluded there is probable cause that Obama’s birth document and his Selective Service registration are forgeries.

The Obama birth certificate case appealed to Monckton’s instincts as a fraud detector. In his role as a policy adviser to Thatcher in the 1980s, Monckton reviewed fraud cases and developed single-page briefs with an action plan for the British prime minister.

Monckton, who has a BA and an MA from Cambridge University, is a former newspaper editor. He was a member of Thatcher’s Conservative Party but now serves as the head of the policy unit for the U.K. Independence Party.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: arpaio; certifigate; naturalborncitizen; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: Chainsawj
The black racists are having a field day with the shotting in florida, can you imagine what they would do if obama is found to be illegally president? I think if he loses the election jackson, sharpton etc, will cause problems that will make the rodney king riots look like an episode of romper room.

They have been preparing and training since last year's flash mobs, Barak Panthers, union thugs in Wisconsin, etc.

The point is, We The People shouldn't submit to their hostage-taking tactics. We don't want violence, but that doesn't mean that our Republic has to pay a heavy price by letting the communist succeed through fear tactics.

If they start violence, we'll end it.

21 posted on 03/29/2012 5:24:00 AM PDT by melancholy (Professor Alinsky, Enslavement Specialist, Ph.D in L0w and H0lder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

I for one, would love to see Pelosi in an orange jump suit, how attractive that would be on her.


22 posted on 03/29/2012 5:24:30 AM PDT by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fee

The GOP leaders will do nothing unless pushed.

It was not the Democrats who pushed for Watergate prosecutions until it reached a critical mass where they had cover.

Same here. A worst case scenario is that the people lose faith in all branches and levels of government. And if they do that then all career politicians will be at risk. So the Repubs - especially those in during the 2008 debacle - will continue to stonewall and deflect as well.


23 posted on 03/29/2012 5:29:46 AM PDT by bluecat6 ( "A non-denial denial. They doubt our heritage, but they don't say the story is not accurate.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
"Who cares!! Why do people live in fear! Who gives a flip what they do."

Well the people who own properties in those areas for one and the reason being is if their are riots and they burn down those properties I believe you will find the insurance companies don't have to pay out due to a "civil unrest" clause.

Also ask Reginald Denny why people live in fear:


24 posted on 03/29/2012 5:55:18 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: All

FEDS REFUSE TO RELEASE OBAMA DRAFT DOCS TO SHERIFF JOE

Arizona lawman’s team believes registration fraudulent

http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/feds-refuse-to-release-obama-draft-docs-to-sheriff-joe/?cat_orig=us


25 posted on 03/29/2012 6:24:37 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Fee
"Think how dangerous it is to the Dems if the GOP keeps the House, takes the Senate and WH. If the GOP believes there is enough evidence to pursue an investigation the GOP is in position to destroy the Dems for decades..."

Just like in 2000, when everybody was expecting the Bush administration and Attorney General Ashcroft to investigate and prosecute the crimes of the Clinton Administration...

26 posted on 03/29/2012 6:28:20 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

“Thatcher’s fraud detective on video”

Did he uncover fraud in GB during the Iron Lady’s term?


27 posted on 03/29/2012 7:27:05 AM PDT by snafubar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fee
I believe, based on circumstantial evidence, that Obama has signed a secret directive deeming challenges to the eligibility of a president in time of war to be a threat to national security.

IMO, If this media blackout is broken before the election and forgery of the BC gains widespread public awareness, then the Dems would “persuade” Obama to step down and Biden would issue a blanket pardon to Obama for the good of the nation without specifying any crime...thus preserving all of Obama’s presidential acts.

28 posted on 03/29/2012 8:42:14 AM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

Yeah, like a third world nation. And we continue living in fear from what a certain class may do, we are hostages. That is NO way to solve a problem. Bring it on.


29 posted on 03/29/2012 8:58:14 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Isabel C.

Thanks! That’s a major pet peeve of mine....


30 posted on 03/29/2012 9:00:08 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (The only flaw is that America doesn't recognize Cyber's omniscience. -- sergeantdave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: snafubar

“Did he uncover fraud in GB during the Iron Lady’s term?”

He is claimed to have performed “hydrodynamic analysis of warship hull-forms to expose a major Defense fraud”

http://www.ukip.org/content/latest-news/1675-christopher-a-man-of-many-talents

“1982 – 1986 PRIME MINISTER’S POLICY UNIT, 10 Downing Street, London: Special Adviser to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, Prime Minister. Projects included tax/benefit modelling to address poverty; economic modelling to control government spending; sale of publicly-owned houses to their tenants (1,000,000 sold); mathematical development of indexed mortgages (to make them affordable to the poorest); privatisation of water authorities in England and Wales; psephological forecasting by computer; hydrodynamic analysis of warship hull-forms to expose a major Defense fraud; modelling of retrovirus transmission to plan for the HIV crisis; budget control (e.g. £20 billion overspend on housing budget prevented); speech-writing; and drafting answers to Parliamentary Questions.”

Note that in the video with Mike Zullo and Corsi, Monckton describes the LFBC forgery as “serious fraud,” a UK legal term of art. This is the official UK term for big-time fraud exemplified the name of the Serious Fraud Office (SFO).

http://www.sfo.gov.uk/

“Our aim is to protect society from extensive, deliberate criminal deception which could threaten public confidence in the financial system. We investigate fraud and corruption that requires our investigative expertise and special powers to obtain and assess evidence to successfully prosecute fraudsters, freeze assets and compensate victims.”


31 posted on 03/29/2012 9:10:26 AM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Isabel C.

[ Actually, they couldn’t care less. ]

Oh! really... I’ve got my eye on you Isabel... (blinking twich)..


32 posted on 03/29/2012 10:02:55 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Rep Issa: Remember it is the SERIOUSNESS OF THE CHARGE and would
take almost zero dollars to find out who this guy really IS. What is the holdup?


33 posted on 03/30/2012 7:28:54 AM PDT by robroy12 (robroy12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Had the great Andrew Breitbart not been killed... I mean had not died the morning of the Arpaio news conference, the Sheriff’s possee would have had a dominate space on all the cable news shows. Unfortunately, the media had something else they could focus on.


34 posted on 03/30/2012 12:05:54 PM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Liberty and Justice for ALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
Who cares!! Why do people live in fear! Who gives a flip what they do.

Actually people do care and they are reacting as if riots and disorder are coming. Sales of firearms have reached epic proportions. There are more guns in the hands of the citizens of the United States than have been in the hands of any nation's citizens in all of history. Even liberals we know are buying firearms. People instinctively know that we are close to something really big happening and that the police, and the military will not have the resources to protect them.

Anyone who thinks that we are not at risk is living in a dream world. A small number of malcontents, whether they are foreign or domestic could easily throw our country into chaos. People have no idea how vulnerable our infrastructure is to maliciousness. They could even be insiders just trying to give the president the opportunity to declare martial law and end all of our freedoms as we know them. Nothing will surprise me.

My recommendation is to make sure you have at least a minimal amount of provisions on hand. Make sure you have some means to protect yourself, your family and your home. If disaster should strike make sure you don't sit around idle waiting for someone else to rescue you. There is a good chance it will be up to you and your family friends and neighbors to stick together and take care of each other.

35 posted on 03/30/2012 10:13:48 PM PDT by fireman15 (Check your facts before making ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: fireman15
If disaster should strike make sure you don't sit around idle waiting for someone else to rescue you.

I don't expect anything from anyone - never have. And I don't live in fear, it's paralyzing. It's as simple as that. It's because we haven't done the right thing in the past is why things have gone awry. So NOT doing, is NOT the answer.

36 posted on 03/30/2012 10:23:10 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Chainsawj

The country has been living under this “threat” since the ‘60’s. Everything imaginable has been tried to placate the threat. Untold dollars flushed away beginning with LBJ’s “great society” nonsense. Countless lives impacted and major cities allowed to rot. How many other civilized countries on this planet exist where large swaths of cities are a no-go zone?

At this point, they’re 12.7% of the population. X percent not crazy and Y percent already incarcerated. Let them get angry and violent and deal with it like adults.


37 posted on 03/30/2012 10:28:02 PM PDT by Jay Santos CP ("Idiocracy"... It's no longer just a movie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

I am sorry. I undersand what you meant. We are on the same page. I want the right thing done also. If the lefties are stupid enough to go on a rampage after their false profit is exposed... the blood will be on their hands.


38 posted on 03/30/2012 11:05:03 PM PDT by fireman15 (Check your facts before making ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: fireman15

I agree. Let me retract a bit - there is only one place I would call if in trouble - the firehouse. :-)


39 posted on 03/30/2012 11:59:51 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson