Skip to comments.
On March 28, Ed Perlmutter(D) and 182 other Democrats Voted to Seize the Internet. (vanity)
Free Republic quality editoral
| March 29, 2012
| By Lazamataz
Posted on 03/29/2012 9:47:29 AM PDT by Lazamataz
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Another self-generated editorial. I hope this one can stay in the editorial sidebar!
1
posted on
03/29/2012 9:47:36 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
To: TheOldLady; Cyber Liberty; CatherineofAragon; Slings and Arrows; Responsibility2nd; doorgunner69; ..
The Official Lazamataz Funny-But-Somewhat-Disturbing Ping List (24 Satisfied Customers!)
This one ain’t funny, but it’s my editorial and it’s important.
2
posted on
03/29/2012 9:52:29 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Shut up and drill.)
To: Lazamataz
Indeed. Good post. The left has been doing this for ages because they know the media will not report the truth and will blame it on the evil republicans.
Sometimes people on our own side fail to realize that some bills get voted down because of added destructive content within a bill.
3
posted on
03/29/2012 9:58:01 AM PDT
by
dforest
To: Lazamataz
I see it coming eventually, too. Especially if 0-Care is let live, in part or entirety.
Libs-dems/RINOs = flip side of the same dirty coin.
4
posted on
03/29/2012 9:58:50 AM PDT
by
Carriage Hill
(I'll "vote for an orange juice can", over Barry 0bummer and another 4yrs of his Regime From Hell!)
To: dforest
I saw an Occupy Voting Booths graphic, that made me do a little homework, and it immediately became apparant why the bill was truly defeated. Here's the graphic. I would ask someone to completely copy the format, almost to a T, and put MY message into it..... using this article as the linked source.
5
posted on
03/29/2012 10:08:41 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Shut up and drill.)
To: Lazamataz
Once the camel gets his nose under the tent it isn’t long before the sh!t is hip deep.
6
posted on
03/29/2012 10:13:59 AM PDT
by
unixfox
(Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
To: unixfox; John Semmens; Travis McGee; Squantos; Southack; holdonnow
True, but the point is the chess that the left is playing, and why I needed to respond with this article. I need the premise (that dissects the left’s claim) to go viral.
7
posted on
03/29/2012 10:16:21 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Shut up and drill.)
To: martin_fierro; JoeProBono
I need your graphical skills. Please see #5 and post the result here, if you get the chance to get ‘er done.....
8
posted on
03/29/2012 10:25:49 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Shut up and drill.)
To: null and void; kristinn; onyx; trisham; Politicalmom
This editorial needs more exposure.
9
posted on
03/29/2012 10:48:56 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Shut up and drill.)
To: null and void; kristinn; onyx; trisham; Politicalmom
This editorial needs more exposure.
10
posted on
03/29/2012 10:49:16 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Shut up and drill.)
To: Danae; Berlin_Freeper; real saxophonist; RetSignman; BuckeyeTexan
This editorial needs more exposure.
11
posted on
03/29/2012 10:51:36 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Shut up and drill.)
To: Lazamataz
It is nonsensical, and a bright Republican leadership will propose the exact same legislation, with a much more neutral enforcing agency. There is no such thing. People simply have to refuse to work for companies that do that, or else stay off Facebook (my preference).
12
posted on
03/29/2012 11:06:47 AM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(The RNC would prefer Obama to a conservative nominee.)
To: Carry_Okie
Perhaps. But the point is the propaganda counter and the gain from that. The Dems won't go for anything but FCC oversight, so you know the outcome already -- and you win in the court of public opinion.
See, it is important to counter a prevarication by the Democrats. We need to play chess, not checkers.
13
posted on
03/29/2012 11:09:29 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Shut up and drill.)
To: mhking
mhking, who I am in contact with, says.... “Just damn.” LOL
14
posted on
03/29/2012 11:17:25 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Shut up and drill.)
To: Lazamataz
But the point is the propaganda counter and the gain from that. No problem there; we are in agreement. It's time like this that I miss FReeper Registered. He could crank tweak that image in a heartbeat.
See, it is important to counter a prevarication by the Democrats. We need to play chess, not checkers.
Nah, I like to hand them a fully loaded gun and tell them we're playing Russian Roulette. :-)
15
posted on
03/29/2012 11:25:45 AM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(The RNC would prefer Obama to a conservative nominee.)
To: Lazamataz
16
posted on
03/29/2012 11:40:40 AM PDT
by
Islander7
(There is no septic system so vile, so filthy, the left won't drink from to further their agenda)
To: Islander7
GOOD ENOUGH for a source material. I will make corrections sometime today and upload. A few adjustments... but thanks!!!
17
posted on
03/29/2012 11:55:23 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Shut up and drill.)
To: Lazamataz
18
posted on
03/29/2012 12:06:10 PM PDT
by
Fast Moving Angel
(Newt's not a perfect candidate but Jesus isn't running this year. - shoff)
To: Lazamataz
"And since the legislation did fail, the second option is the one that has materialized. The left and their accomplices in the leftist press, is in fact obscuring the true objection (the FCC) and claiming Republicans hate privacy. It is nonsensical, and a bright Republican leadership will propose the exact same legislation, with a much more neutral enforcing agency."
At this point in time, a bright Republican leadership is almost an oxymoron to me. They MUST stand up and fight these duplicitous, snakelike Communists.
Someone who pays for Rush's premium service should send your editorial to him.
To: Lazamataz
Thanks for the report, Laz. They called the last censorship system the “fairness doctrine” and Republicans were said to be against fairness. Dems are sneaky petes.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson