Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

On March 28, Ed Perlmutter(D) and 182 other Democrats Voted to Seize the Internet. (vanity)
Free Republic quality editoral | March 29, 2012 | By Lazamataz

Posted on 03/29/2012 9:47:29 AM PDT by Lazamataz

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last
Another self-generated editorial. I hope this one can stay in the editorial sidebar!
1 posted on 03/29/2012 9:47:36 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TheOldLady; Cyber Liberty; CatherineofAragon; Slings and Arrows; Responsibility2nd; doorgunner69; ..

The Official Lazamataz Funny-But-Somewhat-Disturbing Ping List (24 Satisfied Customers!)

This one ain’t funny, but it’s my editorial and it’s important.


2 posted on 03/29/2012 9:52:29 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Indeed. Good post. The left has been doing this for ages because they know the media will not report the truth and will blame it on the evil republicans.

Sometimes people on our own side fail to realize that some bills get voted down because of added destructive content within a bill.


3 posted on 03/29/2012 9:58:01 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I see it coming eventually, too. Especially if 0-Care is let live, in part or entirety.

Libs-dems/RINOs = flip side of the same dirty coin.


4 posted on 03/29/2012 9:58:50 AM PDT by carriage_hill (I'll "vote for an orange juice can", over Barry 0bummer and another 4yrs of his Regime From Hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dforest
I saw an Occupy Voting Booths graphic, that made me do a little homework, and it immediately became apparant why the bill was truly defeated. Here's the graphic. I would ask someone to completely copy the format, almost to a T, and put MY message into it..... using this article as the linked source.


5 posted on 03/29/2012 10:08:41 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Once the camel gets his nose under the tent it isn’t long before the sh!t is hip deep.


6 posted on 03/29/2012 10:13:59 AM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox; John Semmens; Travis McGee; Squantos; Southack; holdonnow

True, but the point is the chess that the left is playing, and why I needed to respond with this article. I need the premise (that dissects the left’s claim) to go viral.


7 posted on 03/29/2012 10:16:21 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro; JoeProBono

I need your graphical skills. Please see #5 and post the result here, if you get the chance to get ‘er done.....


8 posted on 03/29/2012 10:25:49 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: null and void; kristinn; onyx; trisham; Politicalmom

This editorial needs more exposure.


9 posted on 03/29/2012 10:48:56 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void; kristinn; onyx; trisham; Politicalmom

This editorial needs more exposure.


10 posted on 03/29/2012 10:49:16 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae; Berlin_Freeper; real saxophonist; RetSignman; BuckeyeTexan

This editorial needs more exposure.


11 posted on 03/29/2012 10:51:36 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
It is nonsensical, and a bright Republican leadership will propose the exact same legislation, with a much more neutral enforcing agency.

There is no such thing. People simply have to refuse to work for companies that do that, or else stay off Facebook (my preference).

12 posted on 03/29/2012 11:06:47 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The RNC would prefer Obama to a conservative nominee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Perhaps. But the point is the propaganda counter and the gain from that. The Dems won't go for anything but FCC oversight, so you know the outcome already -- and you win in the court of public opinion.

See, it is important to counter a prevarication by the Democrats. We need to play chess, not checkers.

13 posted on 03/29/2012 11:09:29 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mhking

mhking, who I am in contact with, says.... “Just damn.” LOL


14 posted on 03/29/2012 11:17:25 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
But the point is the propaganda counter and the gain from that.

No problem there; we are in agreement. It's time like this that I miss FReeper Registered. He could crank tweak that image in a heartbeat.

See, it is important to counter a prevarication by the Democrats. We need to play chess, not checkers.

Nah, I like to hand them a fully loaded gun and tell them we're playing Russian Roulette. :-)

15 posted on 03/29/2012 11:25:45 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The RNC would prefer Obama to a conservative nominee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
fcc copy
16 posted on 03/29/2012 11:40:40 AM PDT by Islander7 (There is no septic system so vile, so filthy, the left won't drink from to further their agenda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

GOOD ENOUGH for a source material. I will make corrections sometime today and upload. A few adjustments... but thanks!!!


17 posted on 03/29/2012 11:55:23 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Not exactly on topic, but somewhat related — California finally did something right by introducing a bill banning prospective employers from requiring Facebook info:

http://economy.ocregister.com/2012/03/28/calif-bill-would-ban-employers-from-asking-facebook-passwords/106522/


18 posted on 03/29/2012 12:06:10 PM PDT by Fast Moving Angel (Newt's not a perfect candidate but Jesus isn't running this year. - shoff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
"And since the legislation did fail, the second option is the one that has materialized. The left and their accomplices in the leftist press, is in fact obscuring the true objection (the FCC) and claiming Republicans hate privacy.

It is nonsensical, and a bright Republican leadership will propose the exact same legislation, with a much more neutral enforcing agency."

At this point in time, a bright Republican leadership is almost an oxymoron to me. They MUST stand up and fight these duplicitous, snakelike Communists.

Someone who pays for Rush's premium service should send your editorial to him.

19 posted on 03/29/2012 12:17:22 PM PDT by CatherineofAragon (I can haz Romney's defeat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Thanks for the report, Laz. They called the last censorship system the “fairness doctrine” and Republicans were said to be against fairness. Dems are sneaky petes.


20 posted on 03/29/2012 9:26:44 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson