Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rawhide

it seems better to take annuity payments, if allowed, rather than a lump sum. Defers the taxes into the future, allowing a bigger after-tax return.

But everyone now takes the lump, the argument being more control of funds.


52 posted on 04/02/2012 9:57:07 AM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (and I will not go to Maryland to campaign against MITT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: campaignPete R-CT

I would take the lump sum and then work with a tax accountant to lower possible taxes.

I don’t trust the state enough to pay me out over 20 years. If I could trust the state, I would probably take the annuity.


61 posted on 04/02/2012 11:10:28 AM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson